We can work on Portfolio Project: Commencement PresentationImagine, you have just completed your CSU-Global coursework and are planning to attend commencement in Denver. You skillfully used time-management to overcome the obstacles and challenges presented by other responsibilities to successfully complete your program. As a result of your hard work, you have been asked to prepare a presentation

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements _1883

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all four of the required components, as specified in the assignment including the Mindmap, Written Speech, Slide Presentation, and Video Recording.

_4372

Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes three of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_8938

Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes two of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_7434

Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes one or less of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_4380

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 50.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – Mindmap _9152

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Mindmap demonstrates strong knowledge of five module topics, as specified in the assignment.

_647

Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Mindmap demonstrates adequate knowledge of three-four module topics, as specified in the assignment.

_9538

Edit ratingDelete rating18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Mindmap demonstrates fair knowledge of two-three module topics, as specified in the assignment.

_1140

Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Mindmap fails to demonstrate fair knowledge of the module topics, as specified in the assignment.

_6694

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 30.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation – Written Speech _1306

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Written Speech demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_6760

Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Written Speech demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_9070

Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Written Speech demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_4657

Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Written Speech fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined in the mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_1251

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 50.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation – Slide Presentation _9501

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Slide Presentation demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_3258

Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Slide Presentation demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_8654

Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Slide Presentation demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_5380

Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Slide Presentation fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined in the mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_1508

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 50.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation – Video Recording _7226

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Video Recording demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_2654

Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Video Recording demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_3197

Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Video Recording demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_9376

Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Video Recording fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined in the mindmap, as specified in the assignment.

_5696

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 50.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources – Choice and Integration _112

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least five credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.

_7986

Edit ratingDelete rating32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates at least four credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.

_8888

Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates at least three credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.

_6952

Edit ratingDelete rating16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates less than three credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.

_507

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 40.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization _7796

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format. Conforms to project requirements for each of the four components, as specified in the assignment.

_1898

Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is organized, adequately written, and in proper format. Conforms to most of the project requirements, as specified in the assignment.

_6743

Edit ratingDelete rating18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements, as specified in the assignment.

_8219

Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper format. Does not conform to project requirements, as specified in the assignment.

_5988

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 30.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style _6466

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

_3812

Edit ratingDelete rating16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

_8928

Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

_4573

Edit ratingDelete rating8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

_2139

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 20.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style _3947

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.

_6792

Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

_9252

Edit ratingDelete rating18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.

_7815

Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.

_4743

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 30.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

view longer description

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit ratingDelete rating5to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating0to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts/ 5 pts

Total Points: 350.0

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples