for the presidential elections in the United States in 1996 was 49%. However, the voter turnout in the Eur Cultural Intelligence opean Parliament elections for 1999 wa Cultural Intelligence s at 49.51 percent. For both types of elections, this turnout was among the very lowest. While both are at their lowest, it is difficult to use this as an excuse for the lack of democracy in the European Union. As a matter of fact, the case of the United States is very different from that of the European Union and the reasons for the low voter tur Cultural Intelligence nouts. For the European Union, the people have an option of whether to b Cultural Intelligence elong to the Union or not. And the way they can show their willingness to belong or not belong to the Union is thro Cultural Intelligence ugh participating (or not participating) in its activities such as elections. The social aspect of t Cultural Intelligence he European Union, that of being accepted or rejected by the people, has been observed in the way the people have turned out in low numbers at each European Parliament vote[11]. The massive lack of knowledge for the common citizen of the European Union has led to the lack of participation by the voters. On the other hand, the United States el Cultural Intelligence ectorate can have a low voter turnout for many other reasons none (or very little) of which is being against the union that is the United States. As it is, the European Union is not a very effective and efficient democracy given that its workings are not in line even with th Cultural Intelligence e developing democracies of the world. First, it is torn between being a government, and an international organisation. Secondly, the citizens, having seen th Cultural Intelligence  at the democracy of the Union does not work (and it is too complex to understand), are increasingly ceasing to buy into the idea of the European Union being there to improve their lives through fostering democracy. Democratic Deficit and the Council of the European Union Another organ of the European Union is the Council of the European Union. This Council is also part of the efforts of the union to foster democracy among the member states. Its primary role is acting as the voice of the member governments of the EU while adopting the laws European Union and coordinating the polices of the union as well. Depending on the policies of the union, the government ministers of the members states are the members or the Council of the European Union. The presidency of the Council is heCultural Intelligence ld on a rotating basis (among the states) with each president holding the office for 6 months only. The Council carries out voting on legislation and discussions with both exercises being held in public. The decisions are based on a qualified majority whereby at least 55% of the countries (which is about 65% of the total population of the European Union) are required. In blocking a decision, 4 nations are needed (being the equivalent of 35% of the European Union population). For issues that are of an administrative and procedural nature require a simple majority while a unanimous vote is needed for the very sensitive topics suc Cultural Intelligence h as taxation and foreign policy. While the structure of the Council of the European Union seems to read democracy all through it, the same weaknesses that plague the European Parliament plague it hence it is just another example of democratic deficit in the EU. For Cultural Intelligence  one, own-initiative reports from either the European Parliament or the Council of the European Union do not have legal consequences as such to the member states. Also, both bodies cannot play major roles in the amendment and repealing of legislation t Cultural Intelligence hat is already in place. Lastly, and most importantly, the bodies do not address the needs of the citizens>