With a significant oversupply of hospital beds in the United States, what is the rationale for taxpayer support of the separate and costly hospital system of the Department of Veterans Affairs?

The question first appeared on Write My Essay

Solution 1

---

Why Taxpayers Should Support the Hospital System of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Introduction

All countries value the health of their people. This is the reason why countries like the United States and Canada have substantially invested in health care organizations. Oversupply of hospital beds in the United States is a good thing as it reduces congestion and the sharing of beds in hospitals. However, reducing the chances of transacting contagious diseases, it doesn’t portray the quality services in the United States hospitals. The veteran affairs department’s primary purpose is to help the veterans and members of their families. This department also offers educational opportunities and also compensates for the deaths and disabilities related to military death (Joel, 2018).

The reason why taxpayers should support the veteran department is that veterans are essential to the country. Moreover, most veteran hospitals in the United States have problems attending to experienced patients on time. This is due to a large number of veteran patients. Therefore, taxpayers through the increase of taxes towards the health system would help in building more rooms and the employment of more health professionals. This will reduce the waiting lists of veteran patients  (Joel, 2018).

In conclusion, all veterans in all departments choose to serve and stand for their countries. They have the passion and resilience; however hard it is. Therefore, they require sufficient health care support from their country members. Dan Caldwell said, “Most veterans chose to serve their country, so they should have the choice to access care in the community with their V.A. benefits — especially if the V.A. can’t serve them in a timely and convenient manner,”  (Joel, 2018). For timely and convenient serving, services of the veteran hospitals should be efficient. Thus taxpayers have the rationale to support the separate and expensive services of the veteran hospitals (Joel, 2018)

References

Joel Kupfer, M., Rachel S. Witmer, M., & Viet Do, D. (2018). Caring for Those Who Serve: Potential Implications of the Veterans Affairs Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act of 2018. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 487-489. Https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1539

Solution 2

---

Taxpayers Should Support the Hospital System of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates a separate and costly hospital system for veterans that is funded by taxpayers. This system is intended to provide comprehensive healthcare services to eligible veterans, including acute medical care, rehabilitation, mental health services, and long-term care. However, the United States currently has a significant oversupply of hospital beds, with many private hospitals operating at low occupancy rates. This raises questions about the rationale for taxpayer support of the VA hospital system.

One key reason for the continued existence of the VA hospital system is the unique healthcare needs of veterans. Many veterans have complex medical conditions that are related to their military service, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), and polytrauma. These conditions require specialized care that may not be available in the private sector. Additionally, many veterans may not have the financial resources to access private healthcare, and the VA hospital system serves as a safety net for these individuals.

Another reason for the continued support of the VA hospital system is the ongoing mission of the VA to fulfill its promise to veterans. The VA has a long history of providing healthcare to veterans and has developed a reputation for quality care. This is particularly true for veterans who have served in combat, as the VA has specialized programs and facilities designed to meet the unique needs of these individuals. Additionally, veterans often have a sense of trust and comfort in the VA healthcare system, which can be difficult to replicate in the private sector.

Another factor to consider is the cost-effectiveness of the VA hospital system. While the VA hospital system can be costly to operate, it can also be cost-effective in certain situations. For example, the VA has a centralized purchasing system that allows it to negotiate lower prices for drugs and medical supplies than private hospitals can achieve. Additionally, the VA has been able to achieve lower costs than private hospitals through the use of data analytics, quality improvement initiatives, and care coordination programs.

However, despite these advantages, the VA hospital system has faced significant challenges in recent years. In 2014, it was revealed that veterans were experiencing long wait times and inadequate care at VA hospitals across the country. As a result, the VA has implemented a number of initiatives to improve care quality and access, such as the Veterans Choice Program, which allows veterans to receive care from private providers. Additionally, the VA has focused on expanding its use of telehealth, which allows veterans to receive care remotely and can reduce the need for inpatient hospital care.

In conclusion, the separate and costly hospital system of the Department of Veterans Affairs is necessary for the unique healthcare needs of veterans, the ongoing mission of the VA to fulfill its promise to veterans, and cost-effectiveness of the VA hospital system. Despite some challenges, the VA hospital system is important and must continue to be supported by taxpayers. The VA must continue to implement initiatives to improve care quality and access while reducing the need for inpatient hospital care.

Solution 3

---

Taxpayers Should Support the Hospital System of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system is a separate and costly system that is supported by taxpayers for a number of reasons. One of the main reasons is that VA hospitals are specifically designed and equipped to treat the unique healthcare needs of veterans, including those who have served in combat.

VA hospitals are equipped to treat a wide range of conditions related to military service, such as combat-related injuries, traumatic brain injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other mental health conditions. They also provide specialized care for veterans who have been exposed to environmental hazards, such as Agent Orange or depleted uranium. In addition, VA hospitals are equipped to provide care for the families of veterans who have died in battle, as well as for veterans who are struggling with issues related to post-war life.

Without VA hospitals, injured veterans would have to go to hospitals that are not equipped to handle these types of conditions, which would result in suboptimal care and higher costs. Research has shown that the VA’s integrated model of care is often superior to that available in the private sector, particularly when it comes to treating the physical and emotional wounds of war (Longman & Roy, 2016). This is because VA hospitals are staffed with medical professionals who have been trained specifically to provide care for veterans, and who have access to specialized equipment and resources.

In conclusion, VA hospitals are a vital part of the healthcare system for veterans. They provide specialized care for veterans and their families, which is often not available in the private sector. They also provide a wide range of services that help veterans transition back to civilian life. Taxpayers’ support on the separate and costly hospital system falls on the fact that VA hospitals are meant to be ready to treat the men and women and their families who support or fight our wars.

Reference

Longman, P. & Roy, A. (2016, June 28). The New York Times Company. Retrieved October 01, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/06/28/should-the-veterans-health-care-system-be-privatized