Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Treatment of Psychiatric Emergencies in Children Versus Adults
The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problemsâfrom serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team and law enforcement officials (when indicated), and effectively communicate with family members who are often overwhelmed in emergency situations.
In this weekâs Discussion, you compare treatment of adult psychiatric emergency clients to child or adolescent psychiatric emergency clients.
Compare treatment of adult psychiatric emergency clients to child or adolescent psychiatric emergency clients Analyze legal and ethical issues concerning treatment of child or adolescent psychiatric emergency clients To Prepare:
Review the Learning Resources concerning emergency psychiatric medicine. Consider a case where your adult client had a psychiatric emergency. (Note: If you have not had an adult client with a psychiatric emergency, ask your preceptor to describe one of their clients with a psychiatric emergency to use as an example for this Discussion.) Post:
Briefly describe the case you selected. Explain how you would treat the client differently if he or she were a child or adolescent. Explain any legal or ethical issues you would have to consider when working with a child or adolescent emergency case.
Sample Solution
sizes of tests and their absence of generalizability. At the end of the day, a portion of the examples were excessively little and explicit. A case of this is the investigation by Estiri et al., in which the example just comprised of 380 Iranian inn workers. The particularity of the way of life and occupation makes that the consequences of this examination can’t be viewed as illustrative of different societies or work fields. Besides, there is sadly constantly a possibility of distribution inclination being available. A model is the survey by Goertzen and Fritz (2004), in which was expressed that Bauer and Green (1996) were disillusioned by their outcomes. These creators expressed their mistake, however almost certainly, different creators forget about specific outcomes or data because of such frustration. Another constraint of the examinations talked about is the absence of longitudinal investigations, as this kind of study is important to distinguish variable examples after some time. In addition, the absence of control gatherings of certain examinations is appalling, as control bunches are fundamental for correlation. On the confinements of the examinations talked about, the writing audit itself has a few restrictions too. Above all else, some writing talked about could be viewed as rather obsolete. Authority is a unique research field that is continually changing, along these lines writing that is later is significant. In any case, this could likewise be viewed as a quality as it is additionally critical to take a gander at the master plan, for which more established writing is basic. Besides, not all important writing was perused and examined. Articles and studies were chosen dependent on evident pertinence, be that as it may, almost certainly, some significant data and studies are absent from the survey. A portion of the writing talked about concentrated more on the sexual orientation of the pioneer, other on the sex of the subordinate, and other on both. There were likewise papers that didn’t unmistakably recognize pioneer and subordinate sexual orientation. Most investigations talked about female-male, female-female, and male-male dyadic relationship without unequivocally examining the job of the subjects. It is conceivable that, for instance, a female chief male subordinate relationship contrasts essentially from a female subordinate-male pioneer relationship. Future research should look more into both subordinate and pioneer sexual orientation, and whether these impact dyadic connections in an unexpected way. A significant advance that must be made by future specialists is the I>
sizes of tests and their absence of generalizability. At the end of the day, a portion of the examples were excessively little and explicit. A case of this is the investigation by Estiri et al., in which the example just comprised of 380 Iranian inn workers. The particularity of the way of life and occupation makes that the consequences of this examination can’t be viewed as illustrative of different societies or work fields. Besides, there is sadly constantly a possibility of distribution inclination being available. A model is the survey by Goertzen and Fritz (2004), in which was expressed that Bauer and Green (1996) were disillusioned by their outcomes. These creators expressed their mistake, however almost certainly, different creators forget about specific outcomes or data because of such frustration. Another constraint of the examinations talked about is the absence of longitudinal investigations, as this kind of study is important to distinguish variable examples after some time. In addition, the absence of control gatherings of certain examinations is appalling, as control bunches are fundamental for correlation. On the confinements of the examinations talked about, the writing audit itself has a few restrictions too. Above all else, some writing talked about could be viewed as rather obsolete. Authority is a unique research field that is continually changing, along these lines writing that is later is significant. In any case, this could likewise be viewed as a quality as it is additionally critical to take a gander at the master plan, for which more established writing is basic. Besides, not all important writing was perused and examined. Articles and studies were chosen dependent on evident pertinence, be that as it may, almost certainly, some significant data and studies are absent from the survey. A portion of the writing talked about concentrated more on the sexual orientation of the pioneer, other on the sex of the subordinate, and other on both. There were likewise papers that didn’t unmistakably recognize pioneer and subordinate sexual orientation. Most investigations talked about female-male, female-female, and male-male dyadic relationship without unequivocally examining the job of the subjects. It is conceivable that, for instance, a female chief male subordinate relationship contrasts essentially from a female subordinate-male pioneer relationship. Future research should look more into both subordinate and pioneer sexual orientation, and whether these impact dyadic connections in an unexpected way. A significant advance that must be made by future specialists is the I>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
