We can work on The Color of Law

STEP 1. Write out a summary of the main points from the textbook by Richard Rothstein (2017)
entitled The Color of Law A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America. You began
reading the various chapters of this book during Week 7.
You will determine the word count for your STEP 1.
Your Assignment 3 should a) Mention the title and the author b) State what the main argument or assertion and
the purpose for writing the book c) What information and evidence does the author provide in the various
chapters, to convince us that the contents of the book are accurate, true and correct? d) This book tends to aim
a focus on segregation in Urban cities. Which racial or ethnic group(s) does the book
seem to highlight most? e) In addition to the book, using the course materials, write out several paragraphs,
showing how the information in the book may also be applied to explain the dynamics and consequences of
segregation for Native Americans, and Hispanic [email protected]/[email protected] Americans, and Asian Americans.
Please Remember to add the book to your References list, at the end of your Assignment 3.
References
Richard Rothstein, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America (New
York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2017)
STEP 2. Write out a brief summary of the reading entitled “White by Law” by Ian F. Hanley Lopez (2000).
This part of your Assignment 3 should explain: a) What does the author state, in this article? b) What proof
does this article contain that race and/or ethnicity rules were created through law? c) Which racial or ethnic
groups were intended to be impacted by the law(s) or policies mentioned in this article? d) What impact did the
law(s) mentioned in the article have upon people and on society? e) When and how did the law(s) mentioned
come to an end? You may need to go online to locate addition information to help you provide some type of
response to these STEP 2 questions.
Please Remember to add the book to your References list, at the end of your Assignment 3.
References
Lopez, Ian F. Hanley (2000) “White by Law” in Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge (2nd ed.) by Richard
Delgado and Jean Stefancic (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2000).
STEP 3. How might the information provided in the book by Rothstein and the article by Lopez provide
support for the perspective which suggests that Affirmative Action policies in the U.S. are necessary?
STEP 4. How might the information provided in the book by Rothstein and the article by Lopez provide
support for the perspective which suggests that race and ethnicity were socially constructed?
STEP 5. Add in information from Learning Modules 1, 2 and 3 to create several explanatory paragraphs to add
to your Assignment 3 document. Be sure to mention the Learning Modules while writing information about what
they state.
STEP 6. Explain what you learned from the above course study materials (in STEP 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5). In your
written response state: What do these sources of information all have in common? Write out 2 or more 
3/3/2021 Order 338126419
https://admin.writerbay.com/orders_available?subcom=detailed&id=338126419 3/5
statements to answer this question.
STEP 7. Create a title that shows the reader of your Assignment 3 what to expect after reading it.
STEP 8. Include a references or works cited list. Feel free to use references listed on our Syllabus. Also create
Bold blue font headings and subheadings so that I can see where you are fulfilling each part of the instructions.
STEP 9. Choose 3 of the Week 7 research terms. Discuss what they mean in several paragraphs which will
help to make up your Assignment 3. Those terms were as follows:
Research Terms:
• 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, U.S. Constitution
• The Missouri Compromise of 1820; The Compromise of 1850; The Kansas-Nebraska Act
• Fugitive Slave Act
• The Mason-Dixon Line; Maps before and after the U.S. Civil War
• The rule of hypodescent
• Misegenation Laws; Loving v. Virginia
• The Dred Scott Decision; Plessy v. Ferguson
• Brown v. Board of Education
• The Indian Removal Act
• Takao Ozawa v. United States.
• United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind
• The Chinese Exclusion Act
• The Treaty of Guadlupe-Hildalgo

Sample Solution

Despite the feeling of positivity surrounding FDRs landslide win in the 1936 presidential election, he was wary of the Supreme Court. FDR was concerned that he conservative Supreme Court might look to strike down his New Deal era policies. His motive was the shaping of the ideological balance of the court. The way he would go about this was he solution was to propose the expansion of the number of Supreme Court justices.The proposed bill would have added one justice for each justice over the age of 70. The plan was widely and vehemently criticized, the elites viewed the proposed bill as an undemocratic power grab. However, for reasons historians still don’t quite understand, shortly after FDR made the plan public, the Court upheld several government regulations it had formerly found unconstitutional. Many have attributed this and similar decisions to a politically motivated change of heart on the part of Justice Owen Roberts. Some legal scholars have rejected this narrative, however, asserting that Roberts’ 1937 decisions were not motivated by Roosevelt’s proposal and can instead be reconciled with his prior jurisprudence. This shifted the majority to favour federal welfare and regulatory enactments. Ultimately by 1942, all but two of the supreme court justices were Roosevelt appointees. Despite the legislative gridlock FDR found himself embroiled in, there was a lot of decisive legislation passed. The creation of the US housing authority provided homes for thousands of Americans. For FDR, more Americans owning more homes meant more consumption, more tax revenue. The Fair Labour Standards Act set employment standards for companies who’s business transcended state boundaries. This meant that corporations had to respect a 40 hour work week, as well as pay a living minimum wage. Perhaps most crucially the act called for the end of child labour. Unfortunately, this only applied to those employed in interstate corporations; domestic servants, agricultural workers, and service employees were not protected. It is only when things start to unfold in Europe that FDR can reconstitute himself as the leader of the people in a time of need. On the cusp of World War Two FDR runs against and defeats Wendel>

facebook Share on Facebook

Twitter Tweet

Follow Follow us
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share

Despite the feeling of positivity surrounding FDRs landslide win in the 1936 presidential election, he was wary of the Supreme Court. FDR was concerned that he conservative Supreme Court might look to strike down his New Deal era policies. His motive was the shaping of the ideological balance of the court. The way he would go about this was he solution was to propose the expansion of the number of Supreme Court justices.The proposed bill would have added one justice for each justice over the age of 70. The plan was widely and vehemently criticized, the elites viewed the proposed bill as an undemocratic power grab. However, for reasons historians still don’t quite understand, shortly after FDR made the plan public, the Court upheld several government regulations it had formerly found unconstitutional. Many have attributed this and similar decisions to a politically motivated change of heart on the part of Justice Owen Roberts. Some legal scholars have rejected this narrative, however, asserting that Roberts’ 1937 decisions were not motivated by Roosevelt’s proposal and can instead be reconciled with his prior jurisprudence. This shifted the majority to favour federal welfare and regulatory enactments. Ultimately by 1942, all but two of the supreme court justices were Roosevelt appointees. Despite the legislative gridlock FDR found himself embroiled in, there was a lot of decisive legislation passed. The creation of the US housing authority provided homes for thousands of Americans. For FDR, more Americans owning more homes meant more consumption, more tax revenue. The Fair Labour Standards Act set employment standards for companies who’s business transcended state boundaries. This meant that corporations had to respect a 40 hour work week, as well as pay a living minimum wage. Perhaps most crucially the act called for the end of child labour. Unfortunately, this only applied to those employed in interstate corporations; domestic servants, agricultural workers, and service employees were not protected. It is only when things start to unfold in Europe that FDR can reconstitute himself as the leader of the people in a time of need. On the cusp of World War Two FDR runs against and defeats Wendel>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples

Custom Written Work

Guaranteed on Time

Achieve the Grade You ordered