Develop a PowerPoint The presentation will consist of 11 slides.
The following is required for your slides:
Title slide
Introduction
Conclusion
References slide
Minimum of citations from two reputable sources. You may want to consult the Information Literacy link under Writing and Research Resources below.
The questions below must be answered in each slide
1.One can experience several stressors; however, for the purposes of this plan, it is important to prioritize. Identify the single most important area or stressor in your personal life that needs attention right now and explain why you prioritized this stressor.
2.Reflect on and discuss how managing your priority issue will have an effect on other areas of your life. This gets at the relationship between stressors. You might consider making a diagram showing the relationship; capture a picture of the diagram and insert it into your presentation. Use theory and evidence to explain how addressing this issue will impact you from a holistic perspective (body, mind, emotions, and spirit).
3.How will things be different if you address this area in your life?
4.What strategies might you use to address this area? Address coping, relaxation, and lifestyle. Use theory and evidence from the literature to support your strategies, as well as what you learned from implementing these strategies during Modules 2 and 3.
5.In addition to identifying the strategies, discuss how and when they will be used with a rationale. For example, you may have found one of the relaxation techniques or lifestyle changes particularly helpful and decide how to make it part of your daily routine. Or, one of the coping strategies may only be appropriate in certain situations. Developing and including a schedule may be a way to keep you on track.
6.What are some potential blocks to success? Explain. What actions can you take to address these blocks?
7.In conclusion, discuss how incorporating the stress reduction plan will improve your resilience to stress.
Sample Solution
Briefly, Chekhov’s Russian content is focused round attempting to recollect a surname with equine undertones, and a wide range of conceivable outcomes are recommended to run recollections; with the posting of such prospects taking up the greater part of the story. To just transliterate the recommended names, essentially rendering, e.g., “???????” as “Kobylin”, regardless of how broadly footnoted, would lose “the general purpose of the story.” Once in a while transposition might be done as an activity. Paterson and Macnaughton (1953): recommend another setting of transposition, substantially less regular these days, when rendering English into Latin: a depiction of the crusades in India during the Seven Years War could be transposed in reality to Caesar’s Gaul, with “Clive” being supplanted by “Caesar”, the Indians by “Galli”, and “Suraj ud-Dowlah” by “Vercingetorix”. The outcome may be “a bit of Latin that looks extremely old style”, in spite of the fact that Paterson and Macnaughton alert against “⦠falling into geological absurdities”. Whittlesey doesn’t talk about verse right now all, which would include a few layers of intricacy, as showed by Makkai 2002: 11), who refers to: “two striking instances of scholarly interpretation of an alternate sort, the sort of interpretation where the creative mind of the interpreter takes off and the content withdraws from the first rather definitely”, including Russian (Lermontov conceivably around Northern Iraq, see beneath, and renaming the majority of the characters, placenames, and land includes as needs be, e.g., Nieper is supplanted by Kismid, (Cigaretten) Greta by Fatima, and so on., while leaving the genuine storyline altogether unaltered, even down to subtleties. This paper will talk about the degree to which the transposition has prevailing with regards to safeguarding the first flavor and type of the story: a shaking decent yarn for late pre-youngsters of all ethnoi. >
Briefly, Chekhov’s Russian content is focused round attempting to recollect a surname with equine undertones, and a wide range of conceivable outcomes are recommended to run recollections; with the posting of such prospects taking up the greater part of the story. To just transliterate the recommended names, essentially rendering, e.g., “???????” as “Kobylin”, regardless of how broadly footnoted, would lose “the general purpose of the story.” Once in a while transposition might be done as an activity. Paterson and Macnaughton (1953): recommend another setting of transposition, substantially less regular these days, when rendering English into Latin: a depiction of the crusades in India during the Seven Years War could be transposed in reality to Caesar’s Gaul, with “Clive” being supplanted by “Caesar”, the Indians by “Galli”, and “Suraj ud-Dowlah” by “Vercingetorix”. The outcome may be “a bit of Latin that looks extremely old style”, in spite of the fact that Paterson and Macnaughton alert against “⦠falling into geological absurdities”. Whittlesey doesn’t talk about verse right now all, which would include a few layers of intricacy, as showed by Makkai 2002: 11), who refers to: “two striking instances of scholarly interpretation of an alternate sort, the sort of interpretation where the creative mind of the interpreter takes off and the content withdraws from the first rather definitely”, including Russian (Lermontov conceivably around Northern Iraq, see beneath, and renaming the majority of the characters, placenames, and land includes as needs be, e.g., Nieper is supplanted by Kismid, (Cigaretten) Greta by Fatima, and so on., while leaving the genuine storyline altogether unaltered, even down to subtleties. This paper will talk about the degree to which the transposition has prevailing with regards to safeguarding the first flavor and type of the story: a shaking decent yarn for late pre-youngsters of all ethnoi. >
