activity supporters in the wake of supporting a gather pledges activity. The email will be send to the reachable activity supporters to perceive how they react on War Child. This will be an activity  response investigate. Segment 2.2 Instrument The instrument that was utilized for the information assortment for this exploration is quantitative research. The instrument that was picked is an online overview. The online overview will become more acquainted with the statis Solitary confinement as a correctional tool  tic, financial and psychographic factors of the activity supporters. The online study can be found in Appendix 1. Applying the online review on the activity supporters, the new Privacy law needs to mull over. The online study was led around the activity supporters of War Child. This technique was picked in light of the fact that the analyst needed to find out about the statistic, financial and psychographic factors of the activity supporters. Recovering the outcomes, the Solitary confinement as a correctional tool   factors and expectations of the supporters should be clear. The review comprised of various different decision inquiries regarding the age, degree, business arrange, pay, interests and beneficent giving. The scientist needs to revamp the email after the online studies. The aftereffects of this email will be looked into because of the response and the clickstream information. Area 2.3 Population, Sample and Sampling strategy The populace this examination recognizes are a Solitary confinement as a correctional tool  ll the activity supporters of raise support activities. Populace can be portrayed as the bigger gathering that is taking an interest in an exploration. (Brotherton, 2015) This exploration has a shifted populace, since the examination is focussing on the activity supporters. The gathering comprise of 12000 activity supporters that upheld altogether 9233 raise support activities. The aggregate of>