As usual, include a comment at the top explaining the purpose of the script, your name, and the date it was created.
An inverting amplifier has a gain of A = -2. This means that the amplifier can take in any input signal and produce a corresponding output signal that is inverted and doubled. If the input signal can be modeled by the sinusoidal function Vin(t) = 3sin(t), then find the following:
The function that models the output signal, Vout(t) = A*Vin(t)
Plot Vin(t) and Vout(t) on the same graph. from t = 0 to 10. Let Vin(t) be represented by a green dotted line and Vout(t) be represented by a solid blue line. Title your graph “Input and Output Voltage of an Inverting Amplifier with Gain -2.” Include a legend that identifies your lines.
Suppose you are interviewing for an internship at Instagram. For one of your interview questions, you are asked to either take or find a picture and perform some basic image processing. You will need to:
Take or find a digital image and save it to your local machine. Load the image in MATLAB/Octave by using the imread() function, ie: image = imread(‘pathToImageselfie.jpg’); See the script on the Basic Image Processing page to see an example.
Create a new image called “grayImage” and store in it a version of the original image, but in gray scale (black and white). To convert, use the command grayImage = rgb2gray(image);
Create a cropped image called “croppedImage.” To perform the cropping, compute 10% of the original x and y dimensions and take that amount of pixels off the left, right, top and bottom. Remember, you should not be modifying your original image, but just copy over the desired pixels to croppedImage.
Create a new image called “redRemoved” and store in it just the blue and green components of the original image.
Create a subplot with all images properly labeled that contains the original image and all of your modified image. Organize your subplots into a 2×2 grid.
Extra Credit! Find or take an image of a face. Using imshow, you can mouse over the location of the eyes and the coordinates of your mouse will be displayed on the bottom. Using a similar technique from problem D above, perform a red removal of just the eyes. Save your result in an image called “redEyeRemoval.” Create a new figure with the original and red-eye-removal images in a 1×2 subplot grid, labeled appropriately.
Sample Solution
Dispassionate authenticity, the hypothesis of reality which was created by Plato. It expresses that the unmistakable universe of things is a presentation, like shadows on the divider. While the unmistakable universe of points of interest is incredible, the Theory of Forms involve the imperceptible yet obvious reality and are genuine. Plato thought about that the brain is the one thing that can get to the ageless truth of facts, the domain of the Forms throwing the unmistakable world. The acclaimed purposeful anecdote of the cavern, Plato recommends that people just realize this present reality as shadows of the genuine articles they see associating on a divider. Plato’s character Socrates recommends that information isn’t discernment in such a case that “seeing” is comparable to “knowing,” at that point when one doesn’t see a thing, he never again has the information on what he sees. Observation on this view can be characterized as a moment “marvel” in which sense organs participate in cooperations with outer articles through the demonstration of seeing. Outer items animate real faculties through such collaboration from which a kind of observation � shading, taste, smell, or contact � is experienced. At the point when the demonstration of seeing stops to happen, Plato guarantees that on the view that information is discernment, we never again access the information on the apparent articles. Taking everything into account, Plato sees discernment and conceptualization of observation as discrete ideas. He unequivocally recognizes the hole between the exact instant of discernment and the resulting procedure of observation in which tactile improvements are associated with tangible classes. What’s more, creatures that are unequipped for thinking are likewise brought into the world with detectable quality simply like a man. On the off chance that a man and a creature were to have a similar ability to see in their newborn child organize, discernment can be characterized as something without thinking. Along these lines Plato’s perspective on discernment is at last non-conceptualist � one that thinks about observation as negligible tactile consciousness of outer improvements in illustrative substance without ensuing conceptualization of the sensation. As per Plato, observation and conceptualization of recognition are two separate ideas living in various domains, constrained by various elements. >
Dispassionate authenticity, the hypothesis of reality which was created by Plato. It expresses that the unmistakable universe of things is a presentation, like shadows on the divider. While the unmistakable universe of points of interest is incredible, the Theory of Forms involve the imperceptible yet obvious reality and are genuine. Plato thought about that the brain is the one thing that can get to the ageless truth of facts, the domain of the Forms throwing the unmistakable world. The acclaimed purposeful anecdote of the cavern, Plato recommends that people just realize this present reality as shadows of the genuine articles they see associating on a divider. Plato’s character Socrates recommends that information isn’t discernment in such a case that “seeing” is comparable to “knowing,” at that point when one doesn’t see a thing, he never again has the information on what he sees. Observation on this view can be characterized as a moment “marvel” in which sense organs participate in cooperations with outer articles through the demonstration of seeing. Outer items animate real faculties through such collaboration from which a kind of observation � shading, taste, smell, or contact � is experienced. At the point when the demonstration of seeing stops to happen, Plato guarantees that on the view that information is discernment, we never again access the information on the apparent articles. Taking everything into account, Plato sees discernment and conceptualization of observation as discrete ideas. He unequivocally recognizes the hole between the exact instant of discernment and the resulting procedure of observation in which tactile improvements are associated with tangible classes. What’s more, creatures that are unequipped for thinking are likewise brought into the world with detectable quality simply like a man. On the off chance that a man and a creature were to have a similar ability to see in their newborn child organize, discernment can be characterized as something without thinking. Along these lines Plato’s perspective on discernment is at last non-conceptualist � one that thinks about observation as negligible tactile consciousness of outer improvements in illustrative substance without ensuing conceptualization of the sensation. As per Plato, observation and conceptualization of recognition are two separate ideas living in various domains, constrained by various elements. >
