I’m working on a philosophy discussion question and need support to help me learn.
Hello, I have some work to do , everything is explained below . one of the movies is attached . also you have to answer the reading review questions .
After watching all three videos for this week, please answer the following questions: Is Kant correct that reason alone is sufficient for morality – a morality that is absolute and that applies to all rational creatures? Further, is Kant correct that any rational being that grasps a moral law is automatically motivated to act on that law? Or, are you more likely to say Hume is correct that reason alone is *not* sufficient for morality: That in order to be *motivated* to act morally we also need moral feelings and a desire to do right? And, further, is Hume correct that, by nature, humans are inclined to feel sympathy and empathy for other beings – especially when those other beings are a lot like ourselves?
(Initial posts should be at least six sentences )
Reading Review #5
1. In Sections 3 and 4 (of our first reading) Hume gives two arguments against the idea that “reason” is the source of our moral conduct. Please summarize these arguments as best you can.
2. In section #11 (of our second reading) the editors summarize a “two-fold test” that is required by the categorical imperative. What is this “two-fold test”?
3. Referring to the “two-fold test” mentioned above in question #2, in section #11 Kant offers two examples that fail the first test and two examples that fail the second test. What are these examples? What conclusions does Kant draw from these four examples?
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposalsHeader Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples