Management Fundamentals.
KANSAS CITY, Mo. Missouri football faces a postseason ban next season, while its baseball and softball programs are barred from postseason competition this spring after the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions announced a range of penalties Thursday morning.
MU and the NCAA have been investigating allegations of academic misconduct since tutor Yolanda Kumar announced her role in completing coursework for students in a private Facebook post in November 2016. Mizzou announced that it was being investigated around the same time.
The Committee on Infractions has determined that âthe tutor completed academic work on behalf of 12 Missouri student-athletes,â according to a report released on the NCAA’s website at 11 a.m. local time.
Three Tigers athletic programs now face sanctions from the NCAA:
The entire Mizzou athletic department faces three years of probation.
Kumar, though not named in the report, received a 10-year show-cause order, preventing any NCAA member school from allowing her to work with its athletic department during that time.
The Tigersâ baseball and softball programs cannot participate in the postseason during the 2018-19 season, while the football program isnât eligible for a bowl during the 2019-20 season. All three programs also are banned from postseason conference tournament participation.
Any games in which the 12 student-athletes in question participated after becoming ineligible must be vacated. MU must provide a written report to NCAA staff within 45 days.
The football, baseball and softball programs have been hit with a 5-percent scholarship reduction and also face various recruiting restrictions.
Mizzou, which self-imposed its disassociation from Kumar, also must pay a fine in the amount of $5,000 plus 1 percent of the football, baseball and softball budgets.
Among the recruiting restrictions for 2019-20, football, baseball and softball face a seven-week ban on unofficial visits, a 12.5-percent reduction in official visits, a seven-week ban on recruiting communications, a seven-week ban on all off-campus contacts/evaluation and a 12.5-percent reduction in recruiters allow to make visits on evaluation days.
In a statement, University of Missouri Chancellor Alexander Cartwright said the university would appeal the decision.
“Under Jim Sterkâs tremendous leadership, he has instilled a culture of integrity and purpose in our program and has been a champion for academic excellence. His commitment to the âWin it Rightâ attitude is on display within Mizzou athletics and our talented student-athletes. As we appeal this harsh and inconsistent decision, we are fortunate to have a leader of Jimâs ability to lead our program and our athletes. We are grateful to our alumni, friends and supporters for their support and commitment to Mizzou athletics, which we all know plays a vital role at this great university.â
In the same statement, Athletic Director Jim Sterk said the Committee on Infractions abused its discretion in applying these punishment against MU.
“The University will immediately appeal this decision that has placed unfair penalties on our department and programs. It is hard to fathom that the University could be cited for exemplary cooperation throughout this case, and yet end up with these unprecedented penalties that could unfairly and adversely impact innocent current and future Mizzou student-athletes.”
The statement went on to say, “It is important to note that this was the action of one individual, who acted unilaterally and outside of the expectations that we have established for our staff members.”
During a conference call Thursday afternoon with reporters, Sterk said MU already has a team working on the appeal and the process could take several months. He added MU expects to win the appeal.
In a tweet, MU head football coach Barry Odom echoed Sterk’s statement.
“The committee’s decision is completely unjust and unfair — to our team, to our staff and to our alumni. I’m very grateful for the clear, decisive and unified leadership we have here at Mizzou and I’m looking forward to doing whatever I can to assist with the appeals process. Together, we will fight for this great institution and I will damn sure fight for my team.”
The penalties handed down by the NCAA does not look like it will impact the decision by highly coveted transfer quarterback Kelly Bryant. According to multiple reports, Bryant will stay at Mizzou. Last month, Bryant announced his intentions to transfer to MU from Clemson. He has since signed a financial aid agreement with MU.
Questions:
1) To what extent do you agree (or disagree) with the sanctions that the NCAA has imposed upon the athletic programs at MU for the unethical behavior of the tutor, Yolanda Kumar?
2) Yolanda Kumar wasnât named in the NCAA report because she threatened to breach confidentiality multiple times. However, she has stated that she can no longer work in the Columbia Public Schools district because of the 10-year show-cause penalty levied against her by the NCAA. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this penalty against the tutor?
3) What do you think the outcome of MUâs appeal will be? How do you think this case might affect athletic programs at other universities?
Management Fundamentals
Sample Solution
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples