Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Information Assurance Organizational Security Strategy
⢠Assess organizational networks, systems, and information storage solutions. ⢠Analyze a presented business case for information security principles. ⢠Synthesize security governance objectives and risk management objectives to develop security strategies. ⢠Assess peer reviewed information security resources that represent professional thought and viewpoints for security risk assessment activities. ⢠Develop a cost-effective security strategy using meaningful security program metrics. ⢠Identify adversarial and non-adversarial threats to a selected information system based on relevant information security management metrics. ⢠Describe a cost-effective security strategy using meaningful security program metrics.
Select an organization of your choosing. The objective of creating the research paper includes the finalization of your research paper development process, describing and defending a cost- effective security strategy, and basing those upon meaningful security program metrics in order to identify information security responses and outcomes that are effective. As this is the culmination of the progressive research paper activity, you should provide your cost-effective security strategy, underpinned by security metrics, assessing and identifying issues associated with your selected research topic discussion. Further, gained insights from your research and reflection should result in recommended mitigation actions for your selected information security system.
Sample Solution
ase of Syria, the âimproving [â¦] economic conditions of the large Syrian refugee communities in neighbouring countries [provide] economic alternatives to joining armed groupsâ[8]; decreasing the stateâs military stronghold over its population. It is certain, however, that the likelihood of the collapse of a non-democratic regime as a result of an economic shock depends on its depth and severity, and the degree to which there is the resulting loss in welfare incentivising the population to mobilise. Furthermore, if the state is able to reallocate resources effectively despite an economic crisis, they may be able to withstand opposition to power; for example, by â[cutting] back outlays on subsidies, enabling it to concentrate more resources on the police, domestic security, and the stateâs cultural and media propaganda machineryâ[9] (page 165), as was undertaken in Egypt under Mubarak. While wealth and development are undoubtedly significant in causing a shift towards democratic governance, âauthoritarian regimes around the world [have shown] that they can reap the benefits of economic development while evading any pressure to relax their political control. [An example is Chinaâs economy, which] has grown explosively over the last 25 years, [even though] its politics have remained essentially stagnant.â[10] Evidence of this undermines the thesis that economic factors are the most significant. A second possible explanation for some non-democratic regimes outliving others is the importance of cultural and religious factors. As argued by Almond and Verba, there is a certain ââcivic cultureâ [which] is necessary for the establishment of democracy, and [â¦] this sort of culture is not easy transferable to non-Western culturesâ[15]. The widespread acceptance of state authority and obedience towards civic duties defines the nature of Western culture: for example, the âobeying [of] the laws of the country, paying the taxes levied by the government [or] serving in a jury or as a witness in courtâ[16]. Almond and Verba argue the Western âmix of parochial passivity and modern participant activismâ[17] is only compatible with certain cultures, and could be a factor fixing countries in non-democratic regimes. Some of the most likely explanations for this are likely to be historical religious influences, particularly the influence of Protestantism in the early 17th century in Western Europe. Steve Bruce argues that âProtestantism has contributed to modern dem>
ase of Syria, the âimproving [â¦] economic conditions of the large Syrian refugee communities in neighbouring countries [provide] economic alternatives to joining armed groupsâ[8]; decreasing the stateâs military stronghold over its population. It is certain, however, that the likelihood of the collapse of a non-democratic regime as a result of an economic shock depends on its depth and severity, and the degree to which there is the resulting loss in welfare incentivising the population to mobilise. Furthermore, if the state is able to reallocate resources effectively despite an economic crisis, they may be able to withstand opposition to power; for example, by â[cutting] back outlays on subsidies, enabling it to concentrate more resources on the police, domestic security, and the stateâs cultural and media propaganda machineryâ[9] (page 165), as was undertaken in Egypt under Mubarak. While wealth and development are undoubtedly significant in causing a shift towards democratic governance, âauthoritarian regimes around the world [have shown] that they can reap the benefits of economic development while evading any pressure to relax their political control. [An example is Chinaâs economy, which] has grown explosively over the last 25 years, [even though] its politics have remained essentially stagnant.â[10] Evidence of this undermines the thesis that economic factors are the most significant. A second possible explanation for some non-democratic regimes outliving others is the importance of cultural and religious factors. As argued by Almond and Verba, there is a certain ââcivic cultureâ [which] is necessary for the establishment of democracy, and [â¦] this sort of culture is not easy transferable to non-Western culturesâ[15]. The widespread acceptance of state authority and obedience towards civic duties defines the nature of Western culture: for example, the âobeying [of] the laws of the country, paying the taxes levied by the government [or] serving in a jury or as a witness in courtâ[16]. Almond and Verba argue the Western âmix of parochial passivity and modern participant activismâ[17] is only compatible with certain cultures, and could be a factor fixing countries in non-democratic regimes. Some of the most likely explanations for this are likely to be historical religious influences, particularly the influence of Protestantism in the early 17th century in Western Europe. Steve Bruce argues that âProtestantism has contributed to modern dem>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
