Jewel (2010) contends that it is essential for natives to comprehend the constituents of a vote based government in light of the fact that their sentiments are dependent upon such data. Thus, Khalilzad (2010) declares that data on how a just routine functions is crucial for natives to be included and comprehend the occurring around them. This is on the grounds that without such data, residents are unfit to settle on educated decisions about strategies and political pioneers. Second, a nation’s dimension of financial improvement enormously impacts the result of vote based system. As expressed in before exchanges, financial improvement relates with majority rules system. Along these lines, it is exceptionally imperative for Iraq to grow financially so as to keep up a vote based arrangement of government. As hailed by the modernization hypothesis, Iraq must make occupations, advance instruction, and improve framework so as to change from a conventional economy into a cutting edge one (Mumtaz, 2010). Third, a difference in religion is essential for Iraq. In Iraq, Muslims trust that brutality is t Feminisation of international migration  he answer for each contention. In the event that Iraqi residents could move far from this domineering religion, at that point the procedure of democratization will be simple. Finally, every resident in Iraq ought to approach social equity. Sadiki (2014) contends that social is basic to avert maltreatment of fundamental human rights and upgrade social and self-improvement of residents. Democratization Process in Turkey Turkey has been amidst an intricate democratization process since the closures of the 1980 rebellion (Akgün, Perç Feminisation of international migration  inoğlu and Senyücel Gündoğar, 2010). Grigoriadis (2010) states that since Turkey directed its first decision after the upset, it has experienced indispensable changes that have incredibly impacted its democratization procedure. Keyman (2010) contends that Turkey’s nomination for EU participation especially is an impetus for a wide social and political range that contributes decidedly to the accomplishment of political changes. Despite the fact that the procedure of democratization in Turkey has been moderate and significantly described by piecemeal changes, Kuymulu (2013) states that it has not met every one of the criteria that is natural in a liberal majority rules system. Turkey’s democratization procedure has confronted the two snapshots of speeding up and obstructions. The nation needs solidarity between the gatherings as far as goals and authoritative changes that identify with the democratization procedure. A noteworthy pointer of these impediments is the deficiency during the time spent embracing another constitution in 2011 (Kuymulu, 2013). Despite the fact that democratization in Turkey was hindered in the past by the military (overthrow, military takeover and the postmodern rebellion), it has made noteworthy progress. Since its progress to vote based system, Turkeys has prevailing in the usage of different changes. The legislature presented generous changes on connections between the common society and the military, the legal executive and protection of individual life. For quite a bit of Turkish history, the military has applied impact into political illicit relationships. As indicated by Tezcür (2010), Turkey has experienced a huge military driven change fr Feminisation of international migration  om a despotic one into a popularity based one. Concerning the legal executive, the Turkey government is rehearsing the standard of law. To manage the journals of the tyrant routine, the legal executive has conveyed to equity the officers associated with the 1980 overthrow. Other than that, the ongoing “harmony process” by the legislature of Turkey made expectation that the Kurdish issue can be settled and the nation can accomplish majority rule government (Tezcür, 2010). The discoveries one study in Turkey demonstrates that around 60% of the populace are in support>