Write a 2-3 page differential diagnosis paper. Review the history and background of comedian Pete Davidson. Mr. Davidson was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. Applying the recommended 6 steps by Dr. First (attached in this learning module) to conducting a differential diagnosis, present a differential diagnosis for Mr. Davidson. Use the following outline to develop your paper:
I. Present a differential diagnosis(use DSM 5 diagnostic codes) for Mr. Davidson. Present the specific behaviors/symptoms that meet the criteria for this diagnosis. Explain the steps (from Dr. First) you used in your assessment process.
II. Describe any factors in Mr. Davidson’s past or current history that influenced your diagnosis. Explain the theoretical perspective that supports your diagnosis. Support your perspective with the literature (e.g. a theoretical or empirical article).
Sample Solution
Import and fare To get a smart thought of the economy of a despotism, one can look if there is a connection between the import and fare of present day dictatorships. To show this connection, information from the OEC (2018) are exhibited in table 1. The OEC isolates the imported and sent out merchandise into three classifications: crude materials, completed products and enterprises. Table 3 Nation Main fare Main import Balance of exchange Cuba Raw materials Finished products $ – 5,55 billion Belarus Raw materials Raw materials $ – 3,9 billion North Korea Raw materials Finished products $ – 0,5 billion Zimbabwe Raw materials Finished products $ – 2,32 billion All information from The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC, 2018) As can be found in table 1, present day despotisms are predominantly centered around sending out crude materials, while simultaneously, they center around bringing in completed merchandise. From this information can be presumed that totalitarianisms require completed products. The way that dictatorships need to import completed products requests them to have a (somewhat) open exchange approach, with low or no import duties, since in any case their chances of bringing in remote merchandise are restricted. (OEC, 2018) (Wintrobe, Dictatorship, 2004) Exchange boundaries Exchange boundaries have been a piece of worldwide exchange for quite a while. Exchange hindrances make imports progressively costly and simultaneously trade costs are additionally expanded. In this way, exchange hindrances can be utilized to improve the exchange deficiency of nations taking an interest on the worldwide market. (Madsen, 2001) As can be finished up from table 1, the despotisms Cuba, Belarus and North Korea have an exchange shortage. In this way, these dictatorships may be keen on forcing exchange boundaries. Be that as it may, as referenced previously, the significance of imports in these nations is high. Because of the danger of getting unreasonably costly for different nations on the worldwide market, the odds of despotisms forcing exchange obstructions is little. The World Trade Organization centers around keeping up a reasonable worldwide market and in this manner attempts to prohibit the utilization of exchange obstructions against other WTO-individuals. (WTO, 2019) Of the dictatorships referenced in table 1, Cuba and Zimbabwe are a WTO-part, while North-Korea and Belarus are most certainly not. (WTO, 2019) This implies the utilization of exchange obstructions by Cuba or Zimbabwe won’t go on without serious consequences by the WTO and its individuals. All things considered, North Korea and Belarus are not an individual from the WTO. Do they use exchange obstructions? The appropriate response is that they have no motivation to utilize them. Both against Belarus and North-Korea, sanctions are forced by separately the EU and the United States.>
Import and fare To get a smart thought of the economy of a despotism, one can look if there is a connection between the import and fare of present day dictatorships. To show this connection, information from the OEC (2018) are exhibited in table 1. The OEC isolates the imported and sent out merchandise into three classifications: crude materials, completed products and enterprises. Table 3 Nation Main fare Main import Balance of exchange Cuba Raw materials Finished products $ – 5,55 billion Belarus Raw materials Raw materials $ – 3,9 billion North Korea Raw materials Finished products $ – 0,5 billion Zimbabwe Raw materials Finished products $ – 2,32 billion All information from The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC, 2018) As can be found in table 1, present day despotisms are predominantly centered around sending out crude materials, while simultaneously, they center around bringing in completed merchandise. From this information can be presumed that totalitarianisms require completed products. The way that dictatorships need to import completed products requests them to have a (somewhat) open exchange approach, with low or no import duties, since in any case their chances of bringing in remote merchandise are restricted. (OEC, 2018) (Wintrobe, Dictatorship, 2004) Exchange boundaries Exchange boundaries have been a piece of worldwide exchange for quite a while. Exchange hindrances make imports progressively costly and simultaneously trade costs are additionally expanded. In this way, exchange hindrances can be utilized to improve the exchange deficiency of nations taking an interest on the worldwide market. (Madsen, 2001) As can be finished up from table 1, the despotisms Cuba, Belarus and North Korea have an exchange shortage. In this way, these dictatorships may be keen on forcing exchange boundaries. Be that as it may, as referenced previously, the significance of imports in these nations is high. Because of the danger of getting unreasonably costly for different nations on the worldwide market, the odds of despotisms forcing exchange obstructions is little. The World Trade Organization centers around keeping up a reasonable worldwide market and in this manner attempts to prohibit the utilization of exchange obstructions against other WTO-individuals. (WTO, 2019) Of the dictatorships referenced in table 1, Cuba and Zimbabwe are a WTO-part, while North-Korea and Belarus are most certainly not. (WTO, 2019) This implies the utilization of exchange obstructions by Cuba or Zimbabwe won’t go on without serious consequences by the WTO and its individuals. All things considered, North Korea and Belarus are not an individual from the WTO. Do they use exchange obstructions? The appropriate response is that they have no motivation to utilize them. Both against Belarus and North-Korea, sanctions are forced by separately the EU and the United States.>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples