Suppose that you are invested in a software development firm that designs automotive radar software for robotics systems in cars. Your offices and most of the key employees who helped to start the company are in Tampa, but given expansion plans, your current location is no longer sufficient, and you need to decide on a location for your new headquarters. Now, your business is faced with a difficult decision: where do you locate your new headquarters?
Option 1: Lansing, Michigan You could move to Lansing, Michigan to be closer to the demand for your product for such as the Ford assembly plants in Dearborn, Flat Rock, and Wayne, Michigan, and the General Motors assembly plants in Detroit, Flint, and Lansing, Michigan.
Option 2: San Jose, California You could move to San Jose, California to be closer to other technology companies in the Silicon Valley area and benefit from agglomeration economies. Additionally, you would be closer venture capital in nearby San Francisco which may be necessary to fund your expansion.
Option 3: Tampa, Florida You can stay in Tampa where your key employees will most likely be happiest. Although Tampa does not offer the comparative advantages of demand conditions, agglomeration economies, or the factor condition of capital, it does have a relatively good quality of life, and is home to your current employees.
Which option is the best fit for the business and what factors would be most important in making the decision? Specifically comment on the comparative advantages that the location you chose has to offer.
Sample Solution
The Phenomena of Yellow Journalism GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation interpretive article test: sensationalist reporting In America, most of individuals start their day with a crisp paper or with news on TV to remain mindful of the headliners of the day. Reporting should give American culture impartial and pertinent data. Sadly, it isn’t generally along these lines; there is a class of broad communications that doesn’t meet the necessities of genuine reporting. Such news sources distribute questionable or half-honest data, alongside emotional assessments of columnists upheld by arbitrary realities; for the most part, such a classification of broad communications is designated “sensationalist reporting.” Sensationalist reporting as a mass wonders started in the nineteenth century in the United States. In those days, there existed an extraordinary challenge between the two most well known papers of New York: “New York World,” possessed by J. Pulitzer, and “New York Journal,” claimed by W.R. Hearst (WiseGEEK). So as to defeat one another and sell more duplicates, these two periodicals had put melodrama before objectivity; henceforth, rather than giving their perusers impartial reports about ongoing occasions, these papers began to create outrageous stories that had pretty much nothing or nothing regular with the real world. Articles were composed with the essential objective to sell duplicates through stun. Today, one can observer a similar procedure. Correspondents appear to be increasingly keen on delivering a getting story that would hold open consideration, as opposed to transmitting realities as they may be (Western Journalism). Among the most persuasive instances of how sensationalist reporting functions (and how across the board it is) are the title texts of well known papers and diaries. Practically every one of them are formed so that a peruser feels interested by the guarantee of “stunning” subtleties unveiled in the article. This inspires perusers to peruse the content. The most “yelling” features are normally imprinted on the main page, to be in a split second observed by a potential crowd. To be reasonable, a comparable methodology is somewhat frequently utilized by genuine media assets; since they despite everything need to draw in the consideration of potential perusers to their materials, they can utilize “yelling” features, however right now, following articles are normally intensely upheld by valid proof, and are not one-sidedâat any rate not as much as “yellow” periodicals (JournalismAnatomy). Sensationalist reporting can be reprimanded for some, imperfections: one-sided data, low believability, the predominance of embarrassment and stun over objectivity, unprofessionalism and undermining genuine news coverage, and numerous others. Simultaneously, “yellow” stories are frequently additionally intriguing to peruse contrasted with genuine logical materials; this is because of the way that sensationalist reporting abuses close shameful themes and strategies for exhibiting data, and regularly guarantees perusers a sensationâa fleeting occasion that would flabbergast (and delight) a peruser, yet would be handily overlooked (JournalismAnatomy). Maybe, this is the motivation behind why yellow periodicals are being perused so excitedly. Sensationalist reporting started in New York in the nineteenth century, because of extreme challenge between two significant neighborhood periodicals of that time: “New York World” and “New York World.” In request to sell more duplicates, columnists of these periodicals concentrated on sensation and stun instead of on target data. This standard remains the basic of present day yellow media. They use yelling features to draw perusers’ consideration, and generally present unfathomable and one-sided data, upheld by a few arbitrary realities. Simultaneously, proficient genuine assets can likewise utilize a few techniques for sensationalist reporting to support their crowds’ advantage, however right now, despite everything produce excellent materials. Shockingly, regardless of its imperfections, (for example, predisposition, unprofessionalism, and low validity), yellow media stay well knownâfor the most part because of the abuse of electrifying and diverting themes. References “What is Yellow Journalism?” WiseGEEK. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . Carrecia, John. “Sensationalist reporting is Alive and Well.” Western Journalism. N.p., 13 Aug. 2012. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . paper design, authentic>
The Phenomena of Yellow Journalism GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation interpretive article test: sensationalist reporting In America, most of individuals start their day with a crisp paper or with news on TV to remain mindful of the headliners of the day. Reporting should give American culture impartial and pertinent data. Sadly, it isn’t generally along these lines; there is a class of broad communications that doesn’t meet the necessities of genuine reporting. Such news sources distribute questionable or half-honest data, alongside emotional assessments of columnists upheld by arbitrary realities; for the most part, such a classification of broad communications is designated “sensationalist reporting.” Sensationalist reporting as a mass wonders started in the nineteenth century in the United States. In those days, there existed an extraordinary challenge between the two most well known papers of New York: “New York World,” possessed by J. Pulitzer, and “New York Journal,” claimed by W.R. Hearst (WiseGEEK). So as to defeat one another and sell more duplicates, these two periodicals had put melodrama before objectivity; henceforth, rather than giving their perusers impartial reports about ongoing occasions, these papers began to create outrageous stories that had pretty much nothing or nothing regular with the real world. Articles were composed with the essential objective to sell duplicates through stun. Today, one can observer a similar procedure. Correspondents appear to be increasingly keen on delivering a getting story that would hold open consideration, as opposed to transmitting realities as they may be (Western Journalism). Among the most persuasive instances of how sensationalist reporting functions (and how across the board it is) are the title texts of well known papers and diaries. Practically every one of them are formed so that a peruser feels interested by the guarantee of “stunning” subtleties unveiled in the article. This inspires perusers to peruse the content. The most “yelling” features are normally imprinted on the main page, to be in a split second observed by a potential crowd. To be reasonable, a comparable methodology is somewhat frequently utilized by genuine media assets; since they despite everything need to draw in the consideration of potential perusers to their materials, they can utilize “yelling” features, however right now, following articles are normally intensely upheld by valid proof, and are not one-sidedâat any rate not as much as “yellow” periodicals (JournalismAnatomy). Sensationalist reporting can be reprimanded for some, imperfections: one-sided data, low believability, the predominance of embarrassment and stun over objectivity, unprofessionalism and undermining genuine news coverage, and numerous others. Simultaneously, “yellow” stories are frequently additionally intriguing to peruse contrasted with genuine logical materials; this is because of the way that sensationalist reporting abuses close shameful themes and strategies for exhibiting data, and regularly guarantees perusers a sensationâa fleeting occasion that would flabbergast (and delight) a peruser, yet would be handily overlooked (JournalismAnatomy). Maybe, this is the motivation behind why yellow periodicals are being perused so excitedly. Sensationalist reporting started in New York in the nineteenth century, because of extreme challenge between two significant neighborhood periodicals of that time: “New York World” and “New York World.” In request to sell more duplicates, columnists of these periodicals concentrated on sensation and stun instead of on target data. This standard remains the basic of present day yellow media. They use yelling features to draw perusers’ consideration, and generally present unfathomable and one-sided data, upheld by a few arbitrary realities. Simultaneously, proficient genuine assets can likewise utilize a few techniques for sensationalist reporting to support their crowds’ advantage, however right now, despite everything produce excellent materials. Shockingly, regardless of its imperfections, (for example, predisposition, unprofessionalism, and low validity), yellow media stay well knownâfor the most part because of the abuse of electrifying and diverting themes. References “What is Yellow Journalism?” WiseGEEK. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . Carrecia, John. “Sensationalist reporting is Alive and Well.” Western Journalism. N.p., 13 Aug. 2012. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . paper design, authentic>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples