tatutory doctrines and court docket decisions created to assist inside the prosecution of drug offences have contributed to the over criminalisation of drug-related behaviours. Drug policy in NSW is increasingly worried with promoting processes to minimise fitness risks and other harms resulting from the use of hashish and other criminal and prohibited capsules.[4] There are a number of practical and moral coverage issues which are related to the criminalisation  Contrast media in abdomen CT of cannabis. Many policy troubles get up regarding damage minimisation via ‘healing’ criminalisation and harm minimisation. This consists of the cannabis Cautioning Scheme (CCS) which changed into brought in 2000 and is a formal cautioning of adult offenders detected for minor offences relating to cannabis. as well as the Medicinal cannabis Compassionate Use Scheme (MCCUS) which allows police to apply their discretion as whether or not or now not to caution terminally ill sufferers.[5] different coverage troubles that stand up as a result of criminalisation consist of a lack of medical supervision necessarily main to the spread to preventable disorder, overdose deaths, adulterated materials, drug associated violence, distraction of police resources. ‘Pr Contrast media in abdomen CT ohibition is counterproductive — it reasons large harms additional to the ones because of drug use’ in preference to funding for fitness and social services funding is diverted to law enforcement, prosecution and incarceration.’[6] There are concerns as to criminalisation over targeting many low risk offenders together with those dealt with under the CCS.[7] This encroaches on users emotions of private and economic safety as it’s miles often low stage offences that are being treated pushing customers in addition into poverty.[8] there’s a sluggish movement in Australia to decriminalise cannabis however the CCS is a ‘punishment so disproportionate, due to the fact even if you end up having no real penalty you have a fee, the effect on employment opportunities and family may be lifelong.’[9] The cause of criminalisation is regularly puzzled and policy is concerned as whether there are advantages to criminalisation or whether criminalisation is implemented as it’s miles a enormously visible “answer” to actual and perceived harms and risks related to the recreational use of hashish.[10] The framework is an increasing number of utilised as it can be enacted fast, is visible and is often correlated with a robust authorities. it is a common opinion that the NSW government are contradicting their movements and intentions among trying to criminalise cannabis at the same time as minimising the harms related to drug use that is supported through Tadeh Karapetian’s statement ‘the government’s goal of minimising damage has been undermined by way of the criminalisation coverage, via the stigmatisation of hashish customers, the preservation of the black marketplace, the restrictions of di Contrast media in abdomen CT version schemes and the restriction of medicinal use.’ [11] currently, the court docket of criminal attraction in NSW, prolonged crook liability for drug offences, luckily, the high court docket avoided on over reaching prosecution attempts to extend criminal legal responsibility in drug offences. within the case of Bu Contrast media in abdomen CT rns v The Queen the excessive courtroom observed that unlawfully imparting a drug to someone does now not ‘by means of itself, shape the basis for illegal and threatening act manslaughter’.[12] but, if offering a drug did amount to manslaughter, over criminalisation might occu>