Clinical Research Funding

Clinical Research Funding

Application: Clinical Research Funding You are a CRA who works in a university lab that has been focusing on the area of Alzheimer’s disease for 15 years. Your team has discovered a compound which appears to impact the formation of characteristic neurological tangles seen in Alzheimer’s in your rodent model of the disease. Neither the lab’s research budget nor the university have the financial capacity to fund future studies which could bring this decrease in the progression of symptoms or the possible cure to the public. To prepare for this Application Assignment, review the Learning Resources for the week, including the presentation in the media by Dr. Kenneth Kaitin, Chapter 5 from the Bazell text, and the Shaw article. Consider the potential ramifications of accepting each of these different types of research funding.

Write a 2- to 3-page paper in which you identify the various funding options which might be available to you to help develop your novel compound. Analyze at least one potential benefit and one potential challenge presented by each funding source option. Describe why your team’€™s research is worthy of receiving funding.

Clinical Research Funding

Sample Solution

Many people consider that archaeology and archaeologists are particularly involved with excavation – with digging sites. this could be the commonplace public photo of archaeology, as regularly portrayed on tv, even though Rahtz (1991, 65-86) has made clear that archaeologists in fact do many stuff except excavate. Drewett (1999, seventy six) is going similarly, commenting that  Clinical Research Funding ‘it must in no way be assumed that excavation is an vital a part of any archaeological fieldwork’. Excavation itself is a steeply-priced and damaging  Clinical Research Funding studies device, destroying the object of its studies forever (Renfrew and Bahn 1996, 100). Of the present day it’s been mentioned that in place of needing to dig every website online they recognize approximately, most people of archaeologists work within a conservation ethic that has grown up in the past few many years (Carmichael et al. 2003, 41). Given the shift to excavation taking area in most cases in a rescue or salvage context where the archaeology might otherwise face destruction and the inherently adverse nature of excavation, it has end up appropriate to invite whether or not research excavation can be morally justified. This essay will are searching for to reply that question in the affirmative and also explore the professionals and cons of research excavation and non-detrimental archaeological studies methods. If the ethical justification of research excavation is questionable in evaluation to the excavation of threatened web sites, it’d appear that what makes rescue excavation morally applicable is the reality that the website online might be lost to human know-how if it turned into not investigated. It appears clear from this, and seems broadly well-known that excavat Clinical Research Funding ion itself is a useful investigative method. Renfrew and Bahn (1996, 97) advise that excavation ‘keeps its important position in fieldwork because it yields the maximum reliable proof archaeologists are inquisitive about’. Carmichael et al. (2003, 32) note that ‘excavation is the way by which we get admission to the beyond’ and that it is the most basic, defining thing of archaeology. As stated above, excavation is a high priced and negative process that destroys the object of its observe. Bea Clinical Research Funding ring this in mind, evidently it’s miles perhaps the context wherein excavation is used that has a concerning whether or not or no longer it’s miles morally justifiable. If the archaeology is certain to be destroyed thru erosion or improvement then its destruction through excavation is vindicated since tons records that could otherwise be misplaced can be created (Drewett 1999, 76). If rescue excavation is justifiable in view that it prevents total loss in phrases of the capability statistics, does this suggest that research excavation isn’t always morally justifiable because it is not virtually ‘making the exceptional use of archaeological websites that need to be consumed’ (Carmichael et al. 2003, 34)? Many might disagree. Critics of studies excavation may additionally factor out that the archaeology itself is a finite aid that should be preserved anywhere possible for the destiny. The destruction of archaeological proof through pointless (ie non-emergency) excavation denies the possibility of research or entertainment to future generations to whom we might also owe a custodial duty of care (Ra Clinical Research Funding htz 1991, 139). Even at some stage in the most responsible excavations wherein specific facts are made, 100% recording of a domain isn’t always viable, making any non-crucial excavation nearly a wilful de Clinical Research Funding struction of proof. these criticisms are not entirely legitimate although, and in reality the latter holds real all through any excavation, not simplest research excavations, and absolutely at some point of a research undertaking there is likely to be more time to be had for a complete recording attempt than at some Clinical Research Funding  point of the statutory get right of entry to period of a rescue undertaking. it’s far al>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples