We can work on Artwork using the four aspects of critical analysis

Conduct a formal analysis of an artwork using the four aspects of critical analysis described in chapter four of your textbook. Choose one of the three images below and write a formal analysis of the art work in four paragraphs. Follow these guidelines:

  1. Begin by describing the work in detail, addressing the questions posed in section “4.3.1 Description” of your textbook. Describe only. Avoid conclusions.
  2. Next analyze how the elements are put to use in the artwork. How are they arranged or composed? Refer to section “4.3.2 Analysis” in your textbook reading.
  3. Interpret the work. This should be your own interpretation not something you find on the internet. This is you the viewer interacting with the work, your subjective reading.
  4. Finally, give an evaluation of the work, make a judgement. Be sure to give specific and well thought out reasons for your evaluation. It is not enough to state that you like it, or that you think it is good or bad.

El Greco, “Laocoon” 142 x 193 cm, Oil on Canvas, 1604-1614,
Image source: http://arthistoryproject.com/site/assets/files/11753/el-greco-laocoon-1614-trivium-art-history-3.jpg (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Winslow Homer, “Fog Warning”, 76.83 × 123.19 cm (30.2 × 48.5 in), Oil on Canvas, 1885
Image Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Winslow_Homer_-The_Fog_Warning-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Sample Solution

n small before it became small. Moreover, if things only became smaller, and not larger, eventually everything would be miniscule. And if it was the other way around, where everything only became larger, and not smaller, everything would eventually be one thing, because everything would have joined together. If this were the case then we would notice that things only become smaller, shorter, or uglier, and never their opposites, or vice versa. Socrates shows that things do transition from two opposites, by referencing to observable examples. He contrasts this to death, and claims that there has to be a cycle of becoming alive and becoming dead, or else everything would become dead, or vice versa. The analogies that Socrates uses are applicable to every corporeal thing in the universe. Everything is either large or small, tall or short, etcetera. He claims that there is a process of becoming from its opposite (e.g. something becoming larger from being small), and that this process is cyclical. For if everythi>

n small before it became small. Moreover, if things only became smaller, and not larger, eventually everything would be miniscule. And if it was the other way around, where everything only became larger, and not smaller, everything would eventually be one thing, because everything would have joined together. If this were the case then we would notice that things only become smaller, shorter, or uglier, and never their opposites, or vice versa. Socrates shows that things do transition from two opposites, by referencing to observable examples. He contrasts this to death, and claims that there has to be a cycle of becoming alive and becoming dead, or else everything would become dead, or vice versa. The analogies that Socrates uses are applicable to every corporeal thing in the universe. Everything is either large or small, tall or short, etcetera. He claims that there is a process of becoming from its opposite (e.g. something becoming larger from being small), and that this process is cyclical. For if everythi>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples

Custom Written Work

Guaranteed on Time

Achieve the Grade You ordered