I don’t know how to handle this Philosophy question and need guidance.

Discussion needs to be 600 words

We saw, in our reading from St. Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica, an account of a “Natural Law” theory of morality. It is supposed by Aquinas, that insofar as the teleological order we observe in nature was created by God or a prime mover, then we can see that morality should be conceived of as living in accordance with nature—particularly, for us, as human beings, human nature. This was contrasted in our lecture with another view that posits the ultimate grounding or justification of morality derives from theological considerations, “Divine Command Theory.” Rather than emphasizing a teleological justification for morality based on God, Divine Command Theory posits a deontological justification for morality based on God. In Divine Command Theory, morality derives from the duty to obey demands from God. Considerations of ultimate purposes or ends in nature are irrelevant. Which of these positions do you find more attractive, or compelling, and why?

reading will be attached

Peer response needs to be 300 words

I will submit once the person once someone responds

Journal needs to be one full page single spaced.

Citations are mandatory

you will identify a key topic or concept from the previous week and develop some arguments, questions, or reflections that occurred to you in thinking about that topic or concept. Citations of readings assigned in this course will be mandatory for all journal assignments. These are supposed to be reading journals, so it should not be an undue burden to provide quotations from the readings you are reflecting on and discussing.

readings to refer are from this weeks and last weeks