We can work on A “moment of grace” in the work of O’Connor

Sources

Prove the thesis from your research analysis with evidence from the story itself, supplemented with evidence from your research. No quotes over four-lines long. Be sure to provide parenthetical citations for ALL outside information even if you’re not quoting directly.
Consider this model. Remember, it is essential that you focus on the primary source (the story itself) rather than regurgitate the information from the research analysis.

I. Introduction:
A. Get the reader interested with something startling, daring, or provocative.
B. Introduce the title of the story and its author
C. Introduce your topic—maybe, but not necessarily, your thesis, which could come at the end of your second paragraph in which you give background.

For example:

First Introductory Paragraph: Draw the reader in with a compelling opening line. Introduce the topic.

Bombs, booby traps, and blood have young soldiers running for their lives: tonight’s news about the war in Iraq? It could be, or it could be one of Tim O’Brien’s stories about his service in Vietnam.

From there, I would begin to turn the discussion toward my topic, making the transition to my second introductory paragraph that will narrow the discussion from a topic to my specific thesis.

Second Introductory Paragraph: Define any terminology or background that will be discussed in the essay.

Here, I might discuss some historical info about Vietnam, or talk about the lingering psychological effects of war. I would use my introduction to gracefully set up my thesis statement. Often the thesis statement is the last sentence of the introduction.

Put the author’s name and the story title in (or near) the thesis statement. Make sure you spell the writer’s name correctly; make sure the title is in quotation marks and all words of the title are spelled correctly.

Tim O’Brien’s “How to Tell a True War Story” is not really about Vietnam; it is about the effect of war—any war–on the minds of those who survive it.

This will be the main point of my essay, the one I will prove with details from the story and research I’ve found.

Body of the essay:

Stay focused on primary source, i.e., the story or stories listed in the thesis. It’s your analysis of the work that is important. Research should be used sparingly, only in places where it can absolutely help you make a point. The essay should not be a rehash of the research analysis. The purpose of the research analysis was to make you learn more than you’ll really need to write this essay.

Body paragraphs should begin with a topic sentence that define what the paragraph will be about. Each paragraph should provide specific examples from the story that support your thesis. When quoting specific phrases, follow with a citation, e.g.: (O’Connor 361).

Conclusion should restate major points of the essay and close with a return to the opening statement.

Example:

Topic Sentence 1: O’Brien’s focus is on the way the stories are remembered and retold rather than the chronology of the events.

Provide two or three specific examples from the story that prove this point. If you’ve found something perfect while doing research, gently weave it in, too.

Topic Sentence 2: O’Brien uses violent and graphic imagery in the story to invoke the horror forever etched in the minds of those who’ve served in a war zone.

Topic Sentence 3: O’Brien juxtaposes point of view of his first-person narrator to move between the soldier serving active duty and the writer who later attempts to tell the tales.

For each of these, I would find details from the story to prove the accuracy of my stance. When needed (but only where a paraphrase wouldn’t do it justice), I might add an exact quote or quoted description to point something out. Always introduce quoted material, and don’t use a long quote when a snippet would serve the purpose.

Conclusion: It’s been said that war is hell. Certainly, O’Brien makes it clear that not only the war itself is hell, but also the memory of it. (review main points). So next time the nightly news shows young soldiers struggling to survive the latest skirmish, remember the battle will not be over for them, even if they make it home alive.

Notice how I’ve returned to my opening about the news in my concluding line.

Remember, no more than 20% of the essay should be quoted material. Instead, the paper is the writer’s analysis of events.

Be sure to include your sources on Works Cited.
Also provide a page of Sources

The story itself should be cited on Work Cited. Even if you never quote from it directly (which you likely will), you will be referring to it, so it is a Source even if it is not Work Cited.

Sample Solution

The United States is home to probably the most famous and productive chronic executioners ever. Names, for example, Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgeway, and the Zodiac Killer have become commonly recognized names because of the terrible idea of their wrongdoings. One of the most productive chronic executioners in American history is John Wayne Gacy. Nicknamed the Killer Clown due to his calling, Gacy assaulted and killed in any event 33 adolescent young men and youngsters somewhere in the range of 1972 and 1978, which is one of the most noteworthy realized casualty checks. Gacy’s story has become so notable that his wrongdoings have been included in mainstream society and TV shows, for example, American Horror Story: Hotel and Criminal Minds. Criminological science has, and keeps on playing, a significant part in the comprehending of the case and distinguishing proof of the people in question. John Wayne Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual and psychological mistreatment was instrumental in arousing specialist’s curiosity of him as a suspect. John Wayne Gacy was conceived on March 17, 1942, in Chicago, Illinois. Being the main child out of three youngsters, Gacy had a stressed relationship with his dad, who drank vigorously and was regularly oppressive towards the whole family (Sullivan and Maiken 48). In 1949, a temporary worker, who was a family companion, would caress Gacy during rides in his truck; in any case, Gacy never uncovered these experiences to his folks inspired by a paranoid fear of revenge from his dad (Foreman 54). His dad’s mental maltreatment proceeded into his young grown-up years, and Gacy moved to Las Vegas where he worked quickly in the rescue vehicle administration prior to turning into a morgue orderly (Sullivan and Maiken 50). As a morgue chaperon, Gacy was intensely engaged with the preserving cycle and conceded that one night, he moved into the casket of an expired young kid and stroked the body (Cahill and Ewing 46). Stunned at himself, Gacy re-visitations of Chicago to live with his family and graduates from Northwestern Business College in 1963, and acknowledges an administration learner position with Nunn-Bush Shoe Company. In 1964, Gacy is moved to Springfield and meets his future spouse, Marlynn Myers. In Springfield, Gacy has his subsequent gay experience when a collaborator shakily performed oral sex on him (London 11:7). Gacy moves to Waterloo, Iowa, and starts a family with Myers. Nonetheless, after consistently undermining his better half with whores, Gacy submits his initially known rape in 1967 upon Donald Vorhees. In the coming months, Gacy explicitly mishandles a few different adolescents and is captured and accused of oral homosexuality (Sullivan and Maiken 60). On December 3, 1968, Gacy is indicted and condemned to ten years at the Anamosa State Penitentiary. Gacy turns into a model prisoner at Anamosa and is allowed parole in June of 1970, an only a brief time after his condemning. He had to migrate to Chicago and live with his mom and watch a 10:00PM time limitation. Not exactly a year later, Gacy is accused again of explicitly attacking a high school kid however the adolescent didn’t show up in court, so the charges were dropped. Gacy was known by numerous individuals in his locale to be an eager volunteer and being dynamic in network governmental issues. His part as “Pogo the Clown” the jokester started in 1975 when Gacy joined a neighborhood “Chipper Joker” comedian club that routinely performed at raising support functions. On January 3, 1972, Gacy submits his first homicide of Timothy McCoy, a 16-year old kid venturing out from Michigan to Omaha. Guaranteeing that McCoy went into his room using a kitchen blade, Gacy gets into an actual fight with McCoy prior to wounding him over and again in the chest. In the wake of understanding that McCoy had absentmindedly strolled into the live with the blade while attempting to get ready breakfast, Gacy covers the body in his creep space. Gacy conceded in the meetings following his capture that executing McCoy gave him a “mind-desensitizing climax”, expressing that this homicide was the point at which he “understood demise was a definitive rush” (Cahill and Ewing 349). Very nearly 2 years after the fact, Gacy submits his second homicide of a unidentified young person. Gacy choked the kid prior to stuffing the body in his storage room prior to covering him (Cahill 349). In 1975, Gacy’s business was developing rapidly and his craving for youngsters developed with it. Gacy regularly baited youngsters under his work to his home, persuading them to place themselves in binds, and assaulting and tormenting them prior to choking them (Cahill 169-170). The vast majority of Gacy’s killings occurred somewhere in the range of 1976 and 1978, the first of this time occurring in April 1976. A significant number of the young people that were killed during this time were covered in a creep space under Gacy’s home. For the rest of the homicides, Gacy confessed to throwing five bodies off the I-55 extension into the Des Plaines River; in any case, just four of the bodies were ever recuperated (Linedecker 152). In December 1978, Gacy meets Robert Jerome Piest, a 15-year old kid working at a drug store and extends to him an employment opportunity at Gacy’s firm. Piest illuminates his mom regarding this and neglects to restore that night. The Piest family documents a missing individual’s report and the drug specialist illuminates police that Gacy would in all probability be the man that Jerome addressed about a work. When addressed by the police, Gacy denied any inclusion in Piest’s vanishing. Be that as it may, the police were not persuaded, and Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual maltreatment and battery provoked the police to look through his home. Among the things found at Gacy’s home were a 1975 secondary school class ring with the initials J.A.S., various driver’s licenses, binds, garments that was excessively little for Gacy, and a receipt for the drug store that Piest had worked at. Throughout the span of the following scarcely any days, examiners got numerous calls and tips about Gacy’s rapes and the baffling vanishings of Gacy’s representatives. The class ring was in the long run followed back to John A. Szyc, one of Gacy’s casualties in 1977. Futhermore, after analyzing Gacy’s vehicle, specialists found a little bunch of filaments looking like human hair, which were shipped off the labs for additional investigation. That very night, search canines were utilized to distinguish any hint of Piest in Gacy’s vehicle, and one of the canines showed that Piest had, actually, been available in the vehicle. On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of steady police observation and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 killings and educates his attorney and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the slither space and the waterway. 26 casualties were found in the slither space and 4 in the stream. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 killings, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a madness supplication yet was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few legal pointers that agents used to attach Gacy to the killings. A portion of these include fiber investigation, dental and radiology records, utilizing the deterioration cycle of the human body, and facial remaking in distinguishing the people in question. Agents discovered filaments that looked like human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the creep space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners likewise discovered strands that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar territory. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the strands, which would later straightforwardly attach Gacy to the violations. The filaments in Gacy’s vehicle were investigated by criminological researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Besides, the pursuit canines that confirmed that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle demonstrated this by a “demise response”, which told examiners that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever decisively distinguished. A large number of Gacy’s casualties had comparative actual depictions and were hence difficult to recognize by simply asking the general population. To recognize the people in question, agents went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in criminological science and facial reproduction. Facial remaking is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and in general face shape can be helpful in distinguishing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, measurable agents can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in distinguishing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial recreation should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial reproductions is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-passing photos and data. Notwithstanding, this isn’t really ideal in light of the fact that cranial highlights are not generally obvious or at the correct scale (Downing). So as to get a reasonable and more exact portrayal of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a measurable anthropologist are normally fundamental (Downing). Three-dimensional facial recreation is finished by models or high goal, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling filtered photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general deliver results that don’t look fake (Reichs and Craig 491). Once in a while, agents will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a method for facial remaking. Tragically, it’s anything but an ordinarily utilized technique, as it expects specialists to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remaining parts, examiners can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to recognize a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial remaking to distinguish nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial reproductions of these nine casualties: Since facial remaking was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the v>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples