The flexibility of the Free on Board (FOB) contract makes it a far more attractive international sales contract option for exporters than the CIF. It is surprising that any exporter of goods would want to contract under CIF terms.’

Critically analyse the statement in relation to c.i.f. contracts.

The purpose of the assignment is to critically analyse the reading and research of the subject primarily from a legal point of view.
Harvard style, or Oxford OSCOLA Standard of Citations. That means that you should use footnotes to cite case-law, legislations, books/articles, as well as other primary and secondary sources.

Category: Essays

The question first appeared on Write My Essay

Customer Reviews

1. 

   Pretty good site, excellent writers and staff!

2. 

   I ordered two works on Economics and I scored an A and B. It gave me a good opportunity to…

3. 

   Thank you! Definitely a huge help for me, I appreciate everything and everyone there. Quick feedback and perfect papers.

4. 

   You are doing such a great job. I really love the work you do. Keep it up

5. 

   Thank you for always providing great work!

Solution

Critical Analysis of Free on Board (FOB) vs. Cost, Insurance, and Freight (CIF) Contracts in International Sales

• Introduction

The debate surrounding the choice between Free on Board (FOB) and Cost, Insurance, and Freight (CIF) contracts in international sales has been a longstanding one. This critical analysis will examine the statement that “the flexibility of the FOB contract makes it a far more attractive international sales contract option for exporters than the CIF. It is surprising that any exporter of goods would want to contract under CIF terms,” primarily from a legal perspective.

• FOB Contract Flexibility

The FOB contract offers exporters greater flexibility in terms of cost control and risk management. In an FOB arrangement, the seller is responsible for delivering the goods to the designated port, after which the buyer assumes all risk and costs associated with transportation. This flexibility allows exporters to have more control over shipping arrangements, select preferred carriers, and negotiate favorable freight rates.

2.1 Legal Implications of FOB Contracts

From a legal standpoint, FOB contracts provide clear demarcation of responsibilities between the seller and the buyer. This clarity minimizes disputes and ensures a smoother transfer of ownership and risk (Cherunilam,2020). The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and international conventions such as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) often align with the principles of FOB contracts, reinforcing their legal validity and enforceability.

• CIF Contracts and Risk Allocation

Contrary to FOB, CIF contracts involve the seller not only delivering the goods to the destination port but also obtaining insurance for the goods during transit. While this may relieve the buyer of certain logistical responsibilities, it limits the exporter’s flexibility and control over the shipping process. The legal implications of CIF contracts involve more complex risk allocation and potential disputes arising from insurance claims.

3.1 Legal Considerations in CIF Contracts

CIF contracts introduce legal complexities related to insurance, as the seller must secure coverage for the goods. This involves compliance with various insurance laws and regulations, adding layers of legal intricacies to the transaction. Furthermore, the potential for disputes over the adequacy of insurance coverage and claims processing may lead to legal challenges, affecting the overall attractiveness of CIF contracts for exporters.

• Comparative Analysis

FOB and CIF contracts have distinct legal implications, with FOB offering simplicity and clarity while CIF introduces complexities related to insurance and risk allocation. The choice between these contracts depends on the exporter’s risk appetite, familiarity with shipping processes, and desire for control over transportation arrangements.

4.1 Legal Trends and Precedents

Legal trends and precedents play a crucial role in shaping the attractiveness of FOB and CIF contracts. Case law, international conventions, and legislative developments may impact the legal landscape of international sales contracts, influencing exporters’ preferences based on their risk mitigation and legal compliance strategies.

• Conclusion

In conclusion, while the flexibility of FOB contracts may make them more attractive to exporters, the choice between FOB and CIF depends on various legal considerations. FOB contracts provide clear responsibilities and control over shipping arrangements, aligning with legal principles. CIF contracts, on the other hand, introduce legal complexities related to insurance and risk allocation. The decision should be made based on a comprehensive understanding of the legal implications, risk factors, and industry practices, ensuring that the chosen contract aligns with the exporter’s goals and legal obligations.

References

Cherunilam, F. (2020). International Business. New Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

Lista, A. (2016). International Commercial Sales: The Sale of Goods on Shipment Terms. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Tarelli, Elis, C.I.F. or F.O.B.: That is the Question! Main Features of the Two Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (September 3, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1467820 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1467820