Supreme court becoming more of a political court morphing into a mirror of the current pulse of society; (cases listed under paper rqmts) SC
often on wrong side of history

Order Description

Week 4 – Submission of a preliminary annotated bibliography of works to be included in the proposal. At this point, a minimum of 15-25, properly formatted items are
required. (15 points)

The proposal’s bibliography is, generally, a review of the literature and will include a minimum of 25 reference citations. Further, items included in the bibliography
should be annotated – that is, accompanied by a brief description of the work’s contents and value for the investigation – and formatted in the Turabian-Chicago style,
specifically the footnote and bibliographic formats. For reference purposes, an abbreviated Turabian formatting guide is available at:
https://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/turabian/turabian_citationguide.html Keep this close at hand as you are required to use the Turabian style format for all
assignments in this course.

Regarding Internet sources to be used citation purposes, acceptable sites include scholarly websites and documents available through the APUS Online Library, or other
academic and governmental holdings, libraries, archives and databases. For our purposes, Wikipedia (as well as the other “Wiki” sites) is not considered a valid
academic source. Note that, once again, as graduate students, it is your responsibility to ensure the proper formatting for your working bibliography and footnote
entries.
Supreme Court Cases:
1857 Dredd Scott (slaves can’t be US citizen)
1896 Plessy V Ferguson (seperate but equal)
1944 Korematsu v US (japanese internment)
1973 Roe V Wade (abortion first 2 trimesters)
1978 UC Regents v Bakke (race in admissions)
2012 Natl Fed of Indep.Biz v Sebelius(mandate ins)
2015 Obergofell v Hodges (same sex marriage)