Word limit/presentation criteria 3,000. Word limit/presentation criteria 3,000. Learning Outcomes to be assessed (from module spec.)
1. Demonstrate an advanced and detailed knowledge and understanding of the fundamental legal concepts that characterise corporate identity and activity in
a global context2. Demonstrate an advanced and analytical knowledge and understanding of the theoretical framework underpinning corporate governance theories, strategies and
regulation3. Describe and critically evaluate, both theoretically and in practice, different regional models of corporate law and governance4. Operate professionally, ethically and with cultural awareness in a global corporate context
Details of the task
Read the attached memorandum of instructions. Then write a report as instructed.

Assessment criteria

40-49Discussions relating to the review of the quote are primarily basic and descriptive.  The discussions relating to the analysis of the view expressed in the quote are
descriptive and the analysis is limited.  Limited use of secondary academic material, cases and articles is evident in the discussion.  Recommendations relating to how
this area of law can be clarified or improved are limited. In general, whilst the submission demonstrates an understanding of the basic concepts, it is largely
descriptive.
50-59 Discussions relating to the review of the quote demonstrate a reasonable understanding of the main concepts.  The discussion relating to the analysis of the view
expressed in the quote demonstrate an acceptable knowledge and although there is an attempt to develop the analytical aspects of this the student has failed to develop
the discussion in a structured manner.  The use of secondary academic material, articles and cases is primarily descriptive and illustrative but raises some
interesting points. Recommendations relating to how this area of law can be clarified or improved are acceptable but with limited justification in terms of the impact
upon the law in this area.  In general the submission demonstrates a reasonable understanding of the key points but the analytical and evaluative aspects of the
submission lack focus.
60-69Discussions relating to the review of the quote demonstrate a good understanding of the main concepts. The discussion relating to the analysis of the view expressed in
the quote demonstrates a good knowledge of the key points of the relevant area of law and there is constructive use of secondary materials, cases and articles.
Recommendations relating to how this area of law can be clarified or improved include some good points and makes reference to the aims, and objectives which underpin
this area of law.  In general, whilst more evaluation of material could have been provided, the submission demonstrates a good understanding of the subject with
relevant secondary materials.
70 + Discussions relating to the review of the quote demonstrate a very good understanding of the main concepts.  The discussion relating to the analysis of the view
expressed in the quote demonstrates a very good knowledge of the key points and there is constructive and creative use of secondary materials and other cases.
Recommendations relating to how this area of law can be clarified or improved include some good commentary and makes reference to the aims, and objectives which
underpin this area of law.  In general, the submission demonstrates a detailed and good understanding of the subject with relevant secondary materials being used to
structure discussions.