You have been hired by Implementing Windows LLC as an Information Technology consultant to develop a technology proposal. Implementing Windows LLC manufactures and distributes solar panels for the consumer market. Your job is to submit a proposal that meets their criteria.
Current Implementation/Concerns:
-The company will have 3 locations (Chicago, Los Angeles, and Singapore) but are planning to grow rapidly due to high demand in solar panels. Main staff will be at Chicago and Los Angeles offices.
-Data security is priority since patent and trademarks are at stake.
– Singapore sales personnel will need secure remote access to Chicago office.
– The WAN connectivity is in place and it is not an issue. There is ample bandwidth in place.
– Feel free to make other assumptions but they need to be noted in the paper.
Topics to Cover:
Your document should cover the content presented in the course. The outline below contains recommended points to cover. You are free to add other related information.
Describe the technical and business reasons for each choice, citing other resources as appropriate. The Windows Server 2016 operating system should be used for all aspects of the solution.
The topics include:
DNS and DHCP
– How had DHCP installation and authorization been implemented?
– DHCP scope design (e.g., lease times, number of scopes, address range)
– Will a form of DHCP fault tolerance be implemented?
-Will DHCP reservations be used for servers?
– How can IPAM be utilized?
– How will IPv6 be utilized?
– How will DNS be implemented?
– DNS Security
– How will DNS be handled for the second and third site?
– What namespace should Implementing Windows LLC implement?
– What types of zones needed?
Sample Solution
communication allowing the test subject to ask questions when required and also allows the conductor to provide relevant answers and instructions when nessacary. This method becomes helpful in the user experience evaluation as it highlights the main areas of struggle experienced by the test subject and therefore can allow for development in the design phase to either edit the areas of difficulty or provide assistance when required. Therefore it is a vital testing method in the âuser experienceâ evaluation. (Marcus, 2011) (Sirmaci & Ceylan, 01/2014) 3. The Kansei Engineering Method The third and final testing method explored which is also the main area of this report is the âKansei Engineeringâ method. The Kansei engineering method relates directly with the development and design of products through the gradual incorporation of the consumers psychological emotions and their needs and relating to these matters in the design phase of the product. In links both the physical and the emotional aspects of the user through testing and evaluatin Implementing Windows LLC g their responses to the general usability characteristics on said product. As a result of this consumers develop an emotional connection and gain a trust in the product. This is a direct relation to the user experience of a product as when a customer can trust the product and gain a connection both emotionally and physically the user experience cannot but be positive. (Iwaki, 11/2014) (Marcus, 2011) 4. Observation (video recording and the human eye) Through observation as group one member controls the testing ensuring there is no un-expected problems occurring and that the subject feels comfortable in the testing environment. Another group member observes by eye and takes notes throughout the testing process. The third group member then must vide Implementing Windows LLC o record and keep a documented file of the recording so that after the test has been carried out the group can watch over the tape whilst comparing the notes and highlighting the main pain points experienced by the test subject throughout the test and address those areas in the design process. 5. Subjective Rating using-The System Usability Scale (Likert,1932)>
communication allowing the test subject to ask questions when required and also allows the conductor to provide relevant answers and instructions when nessacary. This method becomes helpful in the user experience evaluation as it highlights the main areas of struggle experienced by the test subject and therefore can allow for development in the design phase to either edit the areas of difficulty or provide assistance when required. Therefore it is a vital testing method in the âuser experienceâ evaluation. (Marcus, 2011) (Sirmaci & Ceylan, 01/2014) 3. The Kansei Engineering Method The third and final testing method explored which is also the main area of this report is the âKansei Engineeringâ method. The Kansei engineering method relates directly with the development and design of products through the gradual incorporation of the consumers psychological emotions and their needs and Implementing Windows LLC relating to these matters in the design phase of the product. In links both the physical and the emotional aspects of the user through testing and evaluating their responses to the general usability characteristics on said product. As a result of this consumers develop an emotional connection and gain a trust in the product. This is a direct relation to the user experience of a product as when a customer can trust the product and gain a connection both emotionally and physically the user experience cannot but be positive. (Iwaki, 11/2014) (Marcus, 2011) 4. Observation (video recording and the human eye) Through observation Implementing Windows LLC as group one member controls the testing ensuring there is no un-expected problems occurring and that the subject feels comfortable in the testing environment. Another group member observes by eye and takes notes throughout the testing process. The third group member then must video record and keep a documented file of the recording so that after the test has been carried out the group can watch over the tape whilst comparing the notes and highlighting the main pain points experienced by the test subject throughout the test and address those areas in the design process. 5. Subjective Rating using-The System Usability Scale (Likert,1932)>
