What are “Canadian content” regulations?
- Jason Mittell argues that “Complex TV” is characterized by an “operational aesthetic” whereby viewers not only take pleasure in a narrative but also in learning how that narrative is constructed. Select a television program from this mode of storytelling that you think is great. Write an essay that outlines and explains why itâs so great by evaluating and analyzing its âoperational aesthetic,â
that is, how the program works. What conventions does it rely on to tell its stories
and cultivate viewer comprehension? What conventions does it innovate? What
narrative special effects does it use and to what end? Narrative complexity is an
achievement; your essay should identify and analyze the process and techniques
by which your chosen case study achieves its aesthetic success. For your analysis,
you may consider one program as a whole, or focus on one episode in particular. - When television first emerged as a broadcasting medium, its roots in radio
combined with its poor picture quality meant that early programming tended to
emphasize sound over image. Picture quality has evolved considerably since that
time, and is now able to accommodate more sophisticated visual style, especially
with the development of ultra-high definition widescreen televisions and HD
receivers. Some have speculated that as a result, television now prioritizes image
over sound. Is sound still an (equally) important component of television? If so,
how? Select a case study (a show or an episode) and evaluate and analyze how its
particular use of sound operates within the show and how it contributes to a
larger understanding of television sound. - The aughts, Emily Nussbaum observes, were characterized by a rise in artful
programming, formal experimentation, and complex storytelling. It was the
decade that television finally became recognizable as great art. At the same time,
however, it was also the decade of Reality Television, a decidedly less-esteemed
and more artless kind of programming. Is this a coincidence? Using a reality
television program of your choice as a case study, explore the dimensions of the
reality show format in relation to its conditions of production. Your essay should
situate the rise and persistence of reality television within the larger economic
landscape of the television industry. - Live programming has been a feature of television broadcasting since its
inception. To what extent can television still be considered a âliveâ medium in
the wake of the alternative modes of distribution in the post-Network Era? Does
âlivenessâ continue to create drama, interest, or value? If so, under what
circumstances? Using a particular case study (program, episode, special event)
evaluate the significance of âlivenessâ to televisual form, and whether or not it
continues to be a useful concept for understanding television.
2 - What are âCanadian contentâ regulations? Why do they exist? Outline some of
the major problems that have faced the Canadian television industry in the past
with special consideration of the CBC, Canadaâs national public broadcaster, and
consider the new challenges and/or opportunities that the shift to digital
distribution presents to the protection and promotion of Canadian content and
culture. - Over the last two decades, transnational co-production has become the new
normal for television programming. What exactly are transnational coproductions? Why do they exist? How do they operate in the global television
industry? Evaluate the financial and cultural benefits and drawbacks of this kind
of production model using an internationally co-produced program of your
choice. - The recent shift towards alternative forms of television distribution has increased
the quantity of and variety in available content. This has ushered in new kinds of
niche programming which has not only fostered formal experiments in television
style and narrative, it has also opened up opportunities for more diversity in
production and representation. The post-network era has brought increased
visibility to underrepresented groups. Using a case study of your choice, illustrate
how a particular program represents through its style and/or narrative a group or
community that would not traditionally be found on broadcast network television
in this way. Evaluate the achievements of these representations, and situate your
case study within the larger shifts in the conditions of television production,
distribution, and reception.
Due: March 20, 2019
Submission: Electronic copy uploaded via Turnitin on the course Moodle Site AND a
hard copy in tutorial
Value: 35%
Length: Approximately 1500 words (excluding bibliography), double-spaced, 12-point
font, 1-inch margins
Purpose: This assignment should indicate your ability to make and develop a coherent,
convincing argument in a clear and concise manner, supported by appropriate sources.
Television studies is a set of approaches to the study of television; the purpose of this
assignment is to put these approaches to work and âdoâ television studies.
Evaluation: You will be evaluated on how well you are able to communicate what you
know and show us how you know it. You will be evaluated on how well you are able to
demonstrate the research, reading, and thinking you have done on your topic, and your
ability to synthesize these together with relevant examples that show you can effectively
apply what you have learned to televisual texts.
3
Instructions:
Please include a cover page with the number of the question you are answering, the title
of your paper, your name, your TAâs name, the course number, and your tutorial
number. A bibliography should be included on a separate page. Please use page
numbers. You must use a standard citation style and be consistent (preferably Chicago
or MLA). See: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/resources.html
You may draw upon the course readings and screenings, however you must also include
research beyond the course materials. A minimum of 5 additional scholarly sources
(books or articles) is required. Scholarly sources are peer-reviewed works that are
approved by a community of legitimate experts. If you are unsure about what constitutes
an appropriate source, please ask.
If you are unsure about your choice of program or episode for your case study, please
consult with us. Ideally you will select a show that you like and are already familiar with:
the goal is to get you to see your program in a new way by thinking critically about it,
and situating it within a larger aesthetic, technological, industrial context. In addition,
whatever program or episode you select for your case study, be sure to describe its
central conceit and identify its defining features. Assume your reader is not familiar
with it. In fact, be sure to clarify any and all concepts or terms you use in your
discussion. If you select a sitcom for your case study, include your working definition of
sitcom and its characteristics so we can know the extent of your understanding. This
also helps enrich your discussion with more detail as well.
Grading Dimensions:
CONTENT: Have you answered the assigned question? Have you used appropriate
sources, including course readings and outside sources? Sources grant validity to your
argument by demonstrating that you have considered the perspective of others on your
topic. These perspectives can either affirm your argument, or grant you new insights
that can help you develop your argument.
ARGUMENT & ANALYSIS: Point + Proof + Explanation. Do you present a coherent
argument and discussion? A strong argument is focused and precise. It begins from a
thesis statement. It is a specific answer to a specific question. It is not just a statement of
what you will do in the essay, it is also a statement of your position on a given topic. The
goal of your essay is to be convincing. Is your position supported by evidence? Is it
logically consistent? Does it take into account other major perspectives/counter
arguments? You need to show that you appreciate your topicâs significance and
complexity. How you use those sources is equally important. Using quotes effectively
from your sources is essential to a persuasive essay. Any quote you use should be related
to an important point that you are making. Make your point, use your quote as âproofâ
or as âillustrationâ and then explain your point through the quote you have used. Always
introduce your quotes, and always explain them.
4
ORGANIZATION: Introduction + Body + Conclusion. Is there a clear introduction,
setting out the central topic or question, and an indication of how you will proceed to
address it? Is there a story? An exposition of ideas, one following from the other in
logical progression leading to a conclusion?
STYLE: Grammar, literacy; intelligibility of expression; acknowledgment of sources;
consistent footnote and bibliography style. Following proper formatting shows that you
care about your writing, and that you respect your reader. These details may seem
unimportant but they are rules and regulations that have been set up by the academic
community for a reason: to make sharing knowledge as effective and as clear as possible.
If these rules are followed correctly, your reader can focus solely on the important stuff:
the content of your discussion.
If you have difficulty with any of the above, we encourage you to make an appointment
with The Writing Centre http://writing-centre.writ.laps.
Sample Solution
The projection of intensity in United States-North Korea contemporary associations Presentation Language has a basic job in the projection of political power (Foucault in Pitsoe and Letseka, 2012). Other than being an instrument for correspondence, it additionally fills in as a device for anticipating power, (Bordieu, 1977), depicting certain picture to the group of spectators and directing the open’s concentration toward specific issues (Behr, Iyengar and Cohen refered to in Sirin and Villalobos, 2018). Additionally, language can be a device for capacity to acknowledge what it is known as the ‘holding of presence of mind’ (Jones and Wareing, 1999, p. 34), in order to pass on certain philosophy to its degree being deliberately considered by general society as a major aspect of shared arrangement of standards, what Fairclough calls What are “Canadian content” regulations? ‘the assembling of assent’ (2001, p. 3). As of now a dubious open figure, Donald Trump, since the absolute starting point of his order, has been known for his disagreeable talk. His debut discourse gave the main indications of the ‘logical fracture’ (Sirin and Villalobos, 2018) from his forerunner, whose positive talk extraordinarily varies from Trump’s negative and sharp proclamations. Despite the fact that it isn’t uncommon seeing Trump expressly tending to different nations in a defaming way (Watkins and Phillip, 2018) and regardless of the way that US-North Korean relations have been tense since the Cold War (IBP USA, 2005), new types of correspondence, joined with the enhanced US president’s partiality to open consideration, among different variables, have created a back-and-forth circumstance around such unsafe issues as worldwide security. The point of this exposition, consequently, is to dissect how power is being anticipated in US-North Korea collaborations through talk investigation. Regarding philosophy, a few writings will be considered. Addresses articulated by US President Donald Trump and North Korean government proclamations have been decided for this issue. Preceding our investigation, it is essential to address th What are “Canadian content” regulations? e way that North Korea open correspondence includes an abnormal state of restriction, scoring the last spot in the Reporters without Borders “2017 World Press Freedom Index” (Reporters Without Borders, 2017). With respect to issued by the United States side, the sources counseled have official status (The White House and Donald Trump’s legitimate Twitter) yet the Government of North Korea does not have an open-get to official site in English. Consequently, the main essential source is the official paper of the Central Committee of the Workers Party of Korea: Rodong Sunmun. As far as the method, the paper will be centered initially around a general inves What are “Canadian content” regulati What are “Canadian content” regulations?ons?tigation of the components of correspondence; also, it will think about syntax examination; and thirdly, perspectives identified with the lexical level will be tended to. Thusly, the projection of intensity will be surveyed through these components following a Critical Discourse Analysis model, as indicated by Simpson and Mayr ‘it is the most far reaching endeavor to build up What are “Canadian content” regulations? a hypothesis of the interconnectedness of talk, power, belief system and social structure’ (2010, p. 51). Talk Analysis Components of correspondence For this area, we will use, among others, the Jakobson criteria model exhibited in Barbara Johnstone’s book Discourse Analysis (Jakobson in Johnstone, 2002, p.220), which incorporates an ‘addresser’, a ‘recipient’ and ‘message’. In the primary discourse exhibited, Remarks by President Trump to the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly (Trump, 2017) these parts will assume a significant job. The addresser is Donald Trump as in he is the immediate source. Nonetheless, in the principal line, he expresses that ‘it is a significant respect to remain here in my home city, as an agent of the American individuals, to address the individuals of the world.’ (Trump, 2017). This is the main indication of intensity projection: with this announcement, Trump is suggesting that all that he will specify comes from him as well as supported by the individuals in his nation. At the end of the day, his message isn’t close to home; it originates from the United States to the world and, by implication, to North Korea. This isn’t the situation with State of the Union Speech, as it is focused at the United States specifically and not at a universal association as the United Nations. In this manner, because of the diverse idea of the two correspondences, the two messages will have various repercussions as far as projection of intensity as there is an expansion in authenticity by incorporating addressees in the message (Johnstone, 2002, p.46). On account of North Korea models, we see that Kim Jong-Un himself is barely ever the individual who straightforwardly passes on the message yet an administration official. In the principal model, the addresser is the North Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Regardless, in the other chose content, he is the one to convey the reaction to Trump’s discourse in the Office of the United Nations, truth which could be considered as an approach to extend control itself, as he just talks in uncommon events (Smith, 2017) and this is one of them. Concerning recipient, it is essential to underline that there are a few contrasts as far as immediate referencing. North Korea’s talk shows direct unequivocal references of the United States. In Trump talks, nonetheless, this is very subject to the setting where the talk happens. While addresses thought to be conveyed in a worldwide situation, for example, the one articulated in the Office of the United Natio What are “Canadian content” regulations? ns, include an increasingly genuine talk, it isn’t exceptional to discover direct depictions, similar to “Rocket Man” in interchanges coming legitimately from Trump in progressively casual settings or channels of correspondence, for example, Twitter. Then again, as expressed previously, North Korea does not have this individual measurement as proclamations scarcely ever originated from its pioneer himse What are “Canadian content” regulations? lf. It terms of projection of intensity, this unmistakably expresses a distinction: Donal What are “Canadian content” regulations?d Trump is an open figure, as the leader of the United States yet additionally, as an individual persona with his own suppositions. Kim Jong-Un, then again, not exclusively isn’t isolated from his position (he doesn’t have a private channel of correspondence) yet does not show up in the open universal situation. Along these lines, a picture of inaccessibility is depicted, as though he didn’t take an interest straightforwardly in this issue. At long last, the channel of correspondence is likewise worth referencing. Donald Trump is a devoted Twitter client (36,900 tweets) (Trump, 2018b), which can be utilized as a method for correspondence as well as a method for depicting impact. The exceptionally same demonstration of imparting by web based life has a solid undertone regarding anticipating power. In any case, because of its unconstrained nature, this apparatus empowers to arrive at a high number of individuals (Sirin and Villalobos, 2008) in a flash. In particular, ‘joint talk movement⦠makes and certified shared participation in a “network of training”‘ (Wenger in Johnstone, 2002, p.116). Twitter has its own literary shows. Because of its ability of arrive at people in general and the quickness of the messages, language will in general be immediate and casual. Despite the fact that political talk is ‘very adapted and unsurprising more often than not’ (Edelman in Lim, 2008, p. 4), it is very recognizable how Trump’s talk through online life is not even close to customary presidential talk and his comments highlight practically bantering language. We can see this in the outstanding “atomic catch” tweet, where he expresses that his catch ‘is greater than the North Korean leader’s’ (Trump, 2018b). It is pertinent to believe this is a piece of a political system as in power can be anticipated by exceptionally scholarly talk yet in addition by ignoring the “custom” perspective anticipated considering the kind of collaboration (Fairclough, 2001). In more straightforward words, casual language could be utilized to make light of North Korean dangers. Then again, North Korea’s authentic channel of correspondence is an ideal case of one of Fairclough’s thoughts. He underpins that the entrance to talk itself is as a lot of a decent as financial riches (Fairclough, 2001). If one somehow managed to get to the Korea Central News Agency, it is difficult to discover much data, as access is exceedingly limited and the framework does not permit to scan for in excess of two or three articulations if membership isn’t paid. Along these lines, the channel of correspondence is this case is a device for anticipating power by not giving data, being the definite inverse of Trump’s case. Sentence structure Organization in voices In any case, we will examine these writings as far as sentence structure as ‘linguistic and semantic structures can be utilized as ideological instruments’ (Fowler et al. refered to in Simpson and Mayr, 2010, p. 50). To begin with, our investigation will concentrate on office. Organization is communicated in sentence structure using the detached or the dynamic voice as this is an approach to figure out which members are entertainers and which ones are the beneficiaries of the activity. One noteworthy characteristic of the chose concentrates from Trump is the absence of utilization of aloof voice aside from two cases which will be later tended to. We can see that in ‘Expert and tyrant forces try to crumple the qualities, the frameworks, and partnerships that counteracted struggle’ (Trump, 2018a), where the way that North Kore What are “Canadian content” regulations? a (or dictator systems) is attempting to end with the present condition of harmony is expressed in a roundabout way. Likewise Trump is making a certain reference, which can be utilized in political talk as an approach to dodge duty (Simpson and Mayr, 2010, p.43). We discover another model in this equivalent content: ‘no system has persecuted its own residents more absolutely or severely than the savage fascism in North Korea’. Once more, the system is the fundamental entertainer using personalization and the utilization of dynamic voice. There is a difference in importance between ‘natives have been persecuted>
The projection of intensity in United States-North Korea contemporary associations Presentation Language has a basic job in the projection of political power (Foucault in Pitsoe and Letseka, 2012). Other than being an instrument for correspondence, it additionally fills in as a device for anticipating power, (Bordieu, 1977), depicting certain picture to the group of spectators and dir What are “Canadian content” regulations? ecting the open’s concentration toward specific issues (Behr, Iyengar and Cohen refered to in Sirin and Villalobos, 2018). Additionally, language can be a device for capacity to acknowledge what it is known as the ‘holding of presence of mind’ (Jones and Wareing, 1999, p. 34), in order to pass on certain philosophy to its degree being deliberately considered by general society as a major aspect of shared arrangement of standards, what Fairclough calls ‘the assembling of assent’ (2001, p. 3). As of now a dubious open figure, Donald Trump, since the absolute starting point of his order, has been known for his disagreeable talk. His debut discourse gave the main indications of the ‘logical fracture’ (Sirin and Villalobos, 2018) from his forerunner, whose positive talk extraordinarily varies from Trump’s negative and sharp proclamations. Despite the fact that it isn’t uncommon seeing Trump expressly tending to different nations in a defaming way (Watkins and Phillip, 2018) and regardless of the way that US-North Korean relations have been tense since the Cold War (IBP USA, 2005), new types of correspondence, joined with the enhanced US president’s partiality to open consideration, among different variables, have created a back-and-forth circumstance around such unsafe issues as worldwide security. The point of this exposition, consequently, is to dissect how power is being anticipated in US-North Korea collaborations through talk investigation. Regarding philosophy, a few writings will be considered. Addresses articulated by US President Donald Trump and North Korean government proclamations have been decided for this issue. Preceding our investigation, it is essential to address the way that North Korea open correspondence includes an abnormal state of restriction, scoring the last spot in the Reporters without Borders “2017 World Press Freedom Index” (Reporters Without Borders, 2017). With respect to issued by the United States side, the sources counseled have official status (The White House and Donald Trump’s legitimate Twitter) yet the Government of North Korea does not have an open-get to official site in English. Consequently, the main essential source is the official paper of the Central Committee of the Workers Party of Korea: Rodong Sunmun. As far as the method, the paper will be centered initially around a general investigation of the components of correspondence; also, it will think about syntax examination; and thirdly, perspectives identified with the lexical level will be tended to. Thusly, the projection of intensity will be surveyed through these components following a Critical Discourse Analysis model, as indicated by Simpson and Mayr ‘it is the most far reaching endeavor to build up a hypothesis of the interconnectedness of talk, power, belief system and social structure’ (2010, p. 51). Talk Analysis Components of correspondence For thi What are “Canadian content” regulations? s area, we will use, among others, the Jakobson criteria model exhibited in Barbara Johnstone’s book Discourse Analysis (Jakobson in Johnstone, 2002, p.220), which incorporates an ‘addresser’, a ‘recipient’ and ‘message’. In the primary discourse exhibited, Remarks by President Trump to the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly (Trump, 2017) these parts will assume a significant job. The addresser is Donald Trump as in he is the immediate source. Nonetheless, in the principal line, he expresses that ‘it is a significant respect to remain here in my home city, as an agent of the American individuals, to address the individuals of the world.’ (Trump, 2017). This is the main indication of intensity projection: with this announcement, Trump is suggesting that all that he will specify comes from him as well as supported by the individuals in his nation. At the end of the day, his message isn’t close to home; it originates from the United States to the world and, by implication, to North Korea. This isn’t the situation with State of the Union Speech, as it is focused at the United States specifically and not at a universal association as the United Nations. In this manner, because of the diverse idea of the two correspondences, the two messages will have various repercussions as far as projection of intensity as there is an expansion in authenticity by incorporating addressees in the message (Johnstone, 2002, p.46). On account of North Korea models, we see that Kim Jong-Un himself is barely ever the individual who straightforwardly passes on the message yet an administration official. In the principal model, the addresser is the North Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Regardless, in the other chose content, he is the one to convey the reaction to Trump’s discourse in the Office of the United Nations, truth which could be considered as an approach to extend control itself, as he just talks in uncommon events (Smith, 2017) and this is one of them. Concerning recipient, it is essential to underline that there are a few contrasts as far as immediate referencing. North Korea’s talk shows direct unequivocal references of the United States. In Trump talks, nonetheless, this is very subject to the setting where the talk happens. While addresses thought to be conveyed in a worldwide situation, for example, the one articulated in the Office of the United Nations, include an increasingly genuine talk, it isn’t exceptional to discover direct depictions, similar to “Rocket Man” in interchanges coming legitimately from Trump in progressively casual settings or channels of correspondence, for example, Twitter. Then again, as expressed previously, North Korea does not have this individual measurement as proclamations scarcely ever originated from its pioneer himself. It terms of projection of intensity, this unmistakably expresses a distinction: Donald Trump is an open figure, as the leader of the United States yet additionally, as an individual persona with his own suppositions. Kim Jong-Un, then again, not exclusively isn’t isolated from his position (he doesn’t have a private channel of correspondence) yet does not show up in the open universal situation. Along these lines, a picture of inaccessibility is depicted, as though he didn’t take an interest straightforwardly in this issue. At long last, the channel of correspondence is likewise worth referencing. Donald Trump is a devoted Twitter client (36,900 tweets) (Trump, 2018b), which can be utilized as a method for correspondence as well as a method for depicting impact. The exceptionally same demonstration of imparting by web based life has a What are “Canadian content” regulations? solid undertone regarding anticipating power. In What are “Canadian content” regulations? any case, because What are “Canadian content” regulations? of its unconstrained nature, this apparatus empowers to arrive at a high number of individuals (Sirin and Villalobos, 2008) in a flash. In particular, ‘joint talk movement⦠makes and certified shared participation in a “network of training”‘ (Wenger in Johnstone, 2002, p.116). Twitter has its own literary shows. Because of its ability of arrive at people in general and the quickness of the messages, language will in general be immediate and casual. Despite the fact that political talk is ‘very adapted and unsurprising more often than not’ (Edelman in Lim, 2008, p. 4), it is very recognizable how Trump’s talk through online life is not even close to customary presidential talk and his What are “Canadian content” regulations? comments highlight practically bantering language. We can see this in the outstanding “atomic catch” tweet, where he expresses that his catch ‘is greater than the North Korean leader’s’ (Trump, 2018b). It is pertinent to believe this is a piece of a political system as in power can be anticipated by exceptionally scholarly talk yet in addition by ignoring the “custom” perspective anticipated considering the kind of collaboration (Fairclough, 2001). In more straightforward words, casual language could be utilized to make light of North Korean dangers. Then again, North Korea’s authentic channel of correspondence is an ideal case of one of Fairclough’s thoughts. He underpins that the entrance to talk itself is as a lot of a decent as financial riches (Fairclough, 2001). If one somehow managed to get to the Korea Central News Agency, it is difficult to discover much data, as access is exceedingly limited and the framework does not permit to scan for in excess of two or three articulations if membership isn’t paid. Along these lines, the channel of correspondence is this case is a device for anticipating power by not giving data, being the definite inverse of Trump’s case. Sentence structure Organization in voices In any case, we will examine these writings as far as sentence structure as ‘linguistic and semantic structures can be utilized as ideological instruments’ (Fowler et al. refered to in Simpson and Mayr, 2010, p. 50). To begin with, our investigation will concentrate on office. Organization is communicated in sentence structure using the detached or the dynamic voice as this is an approach to figure out which members are entertainers and which ones are the beneficiaries of the activity. One noteworthy characteristic of the chose concentrates from Trump is the absence of utilization of aloof voice aside from two cases which will be later tended to. We can see that in ‘Expert and tyrant forces try to crumple the qualities, the frameworks, and partnerships that counteracted struggle’ (Trump, 2018a), where the way that North Korea (or dictator systems) is attempting What are “Canadian content” regulations? to end with the present condition of harmony is expressed in a roundabout way. Likewise Trump is making a certain reference, which can be utilized in political talk as an approach to dodge duty (Simpson and Mayr, 2010, p.43). We discover another model in this equivalent content: ‘no system has persecuted its own residents more absolutely or severely than the savage fascism in North Korea’. Once more, the system is the fundamental entertainer using personalization and the utilization of dynamic voice. There is a difference in importance between ‘natives have been persecuted>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples