Question Description
Over the past few decades there has been quite a lot of debate about the reliance on violence risk assessment for both sentencing and prison parole/release purposes.
After reading chapter 5 in your text, conduct some additional research to further explore this practice. In a 1-2 page paper discuss the following:
- Compare and contrast the different methods of assessment – clinical, actuarial, structural professional judgment.
- If you were a practicing forensic psychologist which of these, or combination of these would you use? Why do you think this is the best strategy?
- How reliable is violence risk assessment?
- Why do many in the field have a problem using this type of assessment when making sentencing and/or release decisions for offenders?
Your paper should include one additional source in addition to your textbook (for a total of 2 sources).
Make sure that your paper is written in APA format and your sources are properly cited and referenced.
Grading Criteria | Maximum Points |
Submitted 1-2 page paper addressing the 4 points discussed above. | 70 |
Included a minimum of 2 sources that are properly cited and referenced. | 10 |
Grammar, spelling, and correct APA format. | 20 |
Total: | 100 |
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples