We can work on Various defenses in contract formation

Discuss the various defenses in contract formation, stating what is required to establish each individual defense, and providing examples of when the defense may be found valid.
Sly Salesperson sells cars. While selling a car, Sly Salesperson tells the potential buyer that “this is the best car around. It’s a great car and sips gas.” The car has an average fuel rating. Has Sly Salesperson committed a misrepresentation? Fraud? Why or why not? Does the analysis change if Sly Salesperson says the car get 40 miles per gallon, but in fact the car only gets 30 miles per gallon?

find the cost of your paper
facebookShare on Facebook

TwitterTweet

FollowFollow us

Sample Answer

 

 

 

Defenses in Contract Formation

These defenses, if proven, can render a contract void or voidable, meaning it’s either unenforceable or can be canceled by the injured party.

  1. Lack of Capacity:
    • Requirements: A party lacks the legal capacity to enter a contract. This usually applies to minors, those with mental incapacities, or intoxicated individuals.
    • Examples:
      • A 16-year-old enters a contract to buy a car. The contract is voidable by the minor.
      • An individual with severe dementia signs a contract during a period of mental incapacity.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

  1. Duress:
    • Requirements: One party is forced into a contract by wrongful or unlawful pressure or threats.
    • Examples:
      • Someone is threatened with physical harm unless they sign a contract.
      • Economic duress, where one party uses their superior bargaining power to coerce the other.
  2. Undue Influence:
    • Requirements: One party takes advantage of a confidential relationship or a position of power to persuade the other party to enter a contract.
    • Examples:
      • A caregiver persuades an elderly person to sign a contract that benefits the caregiver.
      • An attorney pressures a client to enter a contract that favors the attorney.
  3. Misrepresentation:
    • Requirements: A false statement of material fact is made, inducing the other party to enter the contract.
    • Types:
      • Innocent Misrepresentation: Unintentional false statement.
      • Negligent Misrepresentation: False statement made without reasonable care.
      • Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Intentional false statement made with knowledge of its falsity and intent to deceive.
    • Examples:
      • A seller states that a property has no termite damage, but it does (innocent).
      • A seller states that a property has no termite damage, without checking for termite damage (negligent).
      • A seller knows a property has termite damage, but states that it does not, to make a sale (fraudulent).
  4. Mistake:
    • Requirements:
      • Mutual Mistake: Both parties are mistaken about a fundamental fact of the contract.
      • Unilateral Mistake: One party is mistaken, and the other party knew or should have known of the mistake.
    • Examples:
      • Both parties believe they are buying and selling a specific piece of land, but they are mistaken about its location (mutual).
      • One party believes they are buying a rare painting, but it’s a copy, and the seller knows this (unilateral).
  5. Illegality:
    • Requirements: The subject matter or purpose of the contract is illegal.
    • Examples:
      • A contract to sell illegal drugs.
      • A contract that violates a licensing requirement.
  6. Unconscionability:
    • Requirements: The contract is so unfair or oppressive that it shocks the conscience of the court.
    • Examples:
      • A contract with extremely one-sided terms and no bargaining power for the weaker party.
      • A contract that is so complex that the weaker party could not understand it.

Sly Salesperson Analysis

  • “Best car around. It’s a great car and sips gas.”
    • This is likely considered “puffery” or sales talk. These are general statements of opinion, not statements of fact.
    • A reasonable person would not rely on such vague statements as a basis for entering a contract.
    • Therefore, this likely does not constitute misrepresentation or fraud.
  • “The car gets 40 miles per gallon, but in fact the car only gets 30 miles per gallon.”
    • This is a specific, measurable statement of fact.
    • If the buyer relied on this statement when deciding to purchase the car, it could constitute misrepresentation.
    • If Sly Salesperson knew the car only got 30 mpg and intentionally stated 40 mpg to deceive the buyer, it would be fraudulent misrepresentation.
    • The fact that the statement is a specific number, greatly increases the liability of the sales person.
    • The difference between the two statements is the level of specificity. The first statement is an opinion, while the second is a statement of fact.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples