Recent studies support the potential of a drug that is derived from the metal iridium to effectively treat cancer.
This experimental drug, Drug ZL105, has not been tested for efficacy and toxicity. Imagine that you are the one
responsible for approving or denying the use of this drug within the United States. Your job is to propose the
testing that is needed for this drug to be determined as safe and effective for the treatment of cancer in
humans. In your research and discussion, you should address the questions below.
What model(s) will you use for testing (i.e., animal, cell cultures, computer simulations)? Explain the choice of
model, and provide support for the reliability of the model. Discuss the pros and cons of your choice.
In determining the safety and effectiveness of the drug, would it be necessary to test efficacy, toxicity, and
lethality? Explain what each of these tests are for and whether or not one or more of the tests are necessary
for your determination.
Provide your thoughts on what information you hope to gather from your tests and whether or not the same
protocol should be used for various categories of products such as drugs, cosmetics, and herbal medicines.
Sample Solution
ouncil for Disabled Children (2014) has noted that the local offer has the potential to provide clarity and confidence for parents; support earlier intervention; reduce the need for assessment: a number of local authorities make a minimum level of short breaks provision readily available, and without costly assessment processes. This meets the needs of many families; identify need and gaps in provision; provide an evidence base for improving progress and securing better outcomes, at school and local level. Under the provision of The Children and Families Act (2013) the purpose of the local offer will allow parents to have as much information about services that are available and therefore give more choice and more control over what support is right for their child. This local offer will impact on the provisions made within schools for students covered by the EA whereby all agencies, parents and schools will have to be more involved in the process of support. Conclusion and Recommendations. The aim of this dissertation was to look at the effects of the Equality Act 2010 on SEN students in mainstream schools. Evidence available from the Department for Education Green Paper, Support and Aspiration, in January 2010 indicate that, 21% of the school population were identified as having SEN:11.4% receiving School Action provision, approximately 916,000 pupils; 6.2% receiving School Action Plus provision, approximately 496,000 pupils; and 2.7% of the school population or 221,000 pupils had a statement of SEN. This SEN grouping will include those students identi>
ouncil for Disabled Children (2014) has noted that the local offer has the potential to provide clarity and confidence for parents; support earlier intervention; reduce the need for assessment: a number of local authorities make a minimum level of short breaks provision readily available, and without costly assessment processes. This meets the needs of many families; identify need and gaps in provision; provide an evidence base for improving progress and securing better outcomes, at school and local level. Under the provision of The Children and Families Act (2013) the purpose of the local offer will allow parents to have as much information about services that are available and therefore give more choice and more control over what support is right for their child. This local offer will impact on the provisions made within schools for students covered by the EA whereby all agencies, parents and schools will have to be more involved in the process of support. Conclusion and Recommendations. The aim of this dissertation was to look at the effects of the Equality Act 2010 on SEN students in mainstream schools. Evidence available from the Department for Education Green Paper, Support and Aspiration, in January 2010 indicate that, 21% of the school population were identified as having SEN:11.4% receiving School Action provision, approximately 916,000 pupils; 6.2% receiving School Action Plus provision, approximately 496,000 pupils; and 2.7% of the school population or 221,000 pupils had a statement of SEN. This SEN grouping will include those students identi>
