We can work on Theory Analysis

1.) Write about- Which theories guide the Ascendant of NY program? (ecological theory, attachment theory, systems theory, psychodynamic theory, self-determination theory and theory of mind).
*Pick a few of these to write on and state how each theory guides the Ascendant
*Describe each theory first and cite the theory in the paper.
*Apply each theory to the Ascendant program and write on how each theory can be applied to the Ascendant program. If the program does not have a guiding theory, include a theory that you think the program should be guided by.

2.) Write about- What design (type of quasi-experimental design) are you proposing to use to evaluate the Ascendant program? Only select one type of quasi experimental design NOTE: quasi-experimental design are designs that are not randomized: NOTE: start each section by saying “The evaluators propose to use design to assess ___. (Something like that)

A.) Describe the design you choose and the (quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design) and how it can be used to assess the outcomes of participants
B.) Apply the quasi-experimental design to your proposed evaluation of the Ascendant program. Describe how you will use this design in the Ascendant program.
C.) Explain why the type of quasi-experimental design that you choose is the most appropriate design to use to assess the effectiveness the Ascendant program has on its participants. For example, start off by saying “This type of quasi experimental design is the most appropriate to use because________________
D.) Apply the design to the Ascendant programs services and justify what information the design you selected will offer on the impact the Ascendant program has on their participants.
E.) Explain what the quasi -experimental non equivalent control group will offer you about accessing the effectiveness of the Ascendant program on its participants

3.) Write about -Identify and describe in detail assessments that will be utilized to measure short and long-term outcomes of Ascendant program and effects that the program has on its participants. (look up types of assessments that would apply and list the names of them and describe them) ) write why your assessments are appropriate for the Ascendant program .
NOTE: Long term outcomes and short term outcomes are listed on the second attachment that says “logic model” .

  • Use these short term and long term outcomes to write this part of the paper. For this part of the paper, You will first list the short term outcomes and then list the long term outcomes in the paper.
    *Then describe how you propose to assess EACH short term and EACH long term outcome including what measurement and scale you will use for each short and long term outcome to make your assessments.
    *Describe the assessments and include some sample questions that you will ask participants of the Ascendant program in the assessments. You will start by saying “The evaluators propose to assess the following short term outcomes and so on…. Then you will say “The evaluators propose to assess the following long term outcomes and so on…

*Your assessments will include:
a. interviews done on participants(research and name type or types of interview you will be doing on participants) who completed the outpatient 60 day program at Ascendant and interviews on participants who completed the 7 day detox. (Include sample interview questions that you will ask participants in the interview and how you will conduct this interview).
b. surveys( name some types of surveys that apply and that you will use) given to participants who completed the outpatient 60 day program
c. surveys given to participants who completed the 7 day detox program
d. records/data of participants who completed Ascendants 60 day outpatient and records/data of participants who completed the 7 day detox program. Records/data of percentage of clients who participated in both.(name what type of data and records will be used if you can)
E.) Indicate frequency of measurement for both short and long-term outcomes (e.g., short term- every 6 months, long term-yearly

g.)Compare short term outcomes(6months) between participants who completed the Ascendant 60 day outpatient program and participants who only did the 7 day detox program at Ascendant.

g.) Compare long term outcomes(1 year) between participants who completed the Ascendant 60 day outpatient program and participants who only did the 7 day detox program at Ascendant.

Sample Solution

The United States is home to the absolute generally famous and productive chronic executioners ever. Names, for example, Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgeway, and the Zodiac Killer have become easily recognized names because of the horrendous idea of their violations. One of the most productive chronic executioners in American history is John Wayne Gacy. Nicknamed the Killer Clown due to his calling, Gacy assaulted and killed in any event 33 adolescent young men and youngsters somewhere in the range of 1972 and 1978, which is one of the most elevated realized casualty tallies. Gacy’s story has become so notable that his violations have been included in mainstream society and TV shows, for example, American Horror Story: Hotel and Criminal Minds. Legal science has, and keeps on playing, a significant part in the understanding of the case and ID of the people in question. John Wayne Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual and psychological mistreatment was instrumental in arousing examiner’s curiosity of him as a suspect. John Wayne Gacy was conceived on March 17, 1942, in Chicago, Illinois. Being the main child out of three kids, Gacy had a stressed relationship with his dad, who drank intensely and was regularly oppressive towards the whole family (Sullivan and Maiken 48). In 1949, a temporary worker, who was a family companion, would caress Gacy during rides in his truck; notwithstanding, Gacy never uncovered these experiences to his folks because of a paranoid fear of retaliation from his dad (Foreman 54). His dad’s mental maltreatment proceeded into his young grown-up years, and Gacy moved to Las Vegas where he worked quickly in the emergency vehicle administration prior to turning into a funeral home specialist (Sullivan and Maiken 50). As a morgue chaperon, Gacy was intensely engaged with the preserving cycle and conceded that one night, he moved into the casket of a perished high school kid and touched the body (Cahill and Ewing 46). Stunned at himself, Gacy re-visitations of Chicago to live with his family and graduates from Northwestern Business College in 1963, and acknowledges an administration learner position with Nunn-Bush Shoe Company. In 1964, Gacy is moved to Springfield and meets his future spouse, Marlynn Myers. In Springfield, Gacy has his subsequent gay experience when a collaborator unsteadily performed oral sex on him (London 11:7). Gacy moves to Waterloo, Iowa, and starts a family with Myers. Notwithstanding, after routinely undermining his significant other with whores, Gacy submits his originally known rape in 1967 upon Donald Vorhees. In the coming months, Gacy explicitly manhandles a few different adolescents and is captured and accused of oral homosexuality (Sullivan and Maiken 60). On December 3, 1968, Gacy is indicted and condemned to ten years at the Anamosa State Penitentiary. Gacy turns into a model prisoner at Anamosa and is allowed parole in June of 1970, an only a short time after his condemning. He had to migrate to Chicago and live with his mom and notice a 10:00PM time limitation. Not exactly a year later, Gacy is accused again of explicitly attacking a young kid yet the adolescent didn’t show up in court, so the charges were dropped. Gacy was known by numerous individuals in his locale to be an energetic volunteer and being dynamic in network legislative issues. His part as “Pogo the Clown” the jokester started in 1975 when Gacy joined a nearby “Sprightly Joker” comedian club that consistently performed at raising support occasions. On January 3, 1972, Gacy submits his first homicide of Timothy McCoy, a 16-year old kid heading out from Michigan to Omaha. Guaranteeing that McCoy went into his room using a kitchen blade, Gacy gets into an actual quarrel with McCoy prior to cutting him over and again in the chest. Subsequent to understanding that McCoy had absentmindedly strolled into the live with the blade while attempting to get ready breakfast, Gacy covers the body in his creep space. Gacy conceded in the meetings following his capture that slaughtering McCoy gave him a “mind-desensitizing climax”, expressing that this homicide was the point at which he “understood passing was a definitive rush” (Cahill and Ewing 349). Very nearly 2 years after the fact, Gacy submits his second homicide of a unidentified youngster. Gacy choked the kid prior to stuffing the body in his wardrobe prior to covering him (Cahill 349). In 1975, Gacy’s business was developing rapidly and his craving for youngsters developed with it. Gacy frequently attracted youngsters under his work to his home, persuading them to place themselves in cuffs, and assaulting and tormenting them prior to choking them (Cahill 169-170). The vast majority of Gacy’s killings occurred somewhere in the range of 1976 and 1978, the first of this time occurring in April 1976. Huge numbers of the young people that were killed during this time were covered in a slither space under Gacy’s home. For the rest of the killings, Gacy confessed to losing five bodies the I-55 extension into the Des Plaines River; be that as it may, just four of the bodies were ever recuperated (Linedecker 152). In December 1978, Gacy meets Robert Jerome Piest, a 15-year old kid working at a drug store and extends to him an employment opportunity at Gacy’s firm. Piest illuminates his mom regarding this and neglects to restore that night. The Piest family documents a missing individual’s report and the drug specialist illuminates police that Gacy would no doubt be the man that Jerome addressed about a work. When addressed by the police, Gacy denied any contribution in Piest’s vanishing. Notwithstanding, the police were not persuaded, and Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual maltreatment and battery provoked the police to look through his home. Among the things found at Gacy’s home were a 1975 secondary school class ring with the initials J.A.S., numerous driver’s licenses, binds, apparel that was excessively little for Gacy, and a receipt for the drug store that Piest had worked at. Throughout the span of the following not many days, agents got numerous calls and tips about Gacy’s rapes and the puzzling vanishings of Gacy’s representatives. The class ring was in the long run followed back to John A. Szyc, one of Gacy’s casualties in 1977. Futhermore, after looking at Gacy’s vehicle, agents found a little group of filaments looking like human hair, which were shipped off the labs for additional examination. That very night, search canines were utilized to distinguish any hint of Piest in Gacy’s vehicle, and one of the canines demonstrated that Piest had, truth be told, been available in the vehicle. On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of steady police reconnaissance and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 homicides and illuminates his legal advisor and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the creep space and the stream. 26 casualties were found in the creep space and 4 in the stream. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 homicides, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a madness supplication however was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few criminological markers that examiners used to attach Gacy to the homicides. A portion of these include fiber examination, dental and radiology records, utilizing the deterioration cycle of the human body, and facial recreation in recognizing the people in question. Agents discovered strands that looked like human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the creep space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners likewise discovered strands that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar region. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the strands, which would later legitimately attach Gacy to the wrongdoings. The filaments in Gacy’s vehicle were dissected by measurable researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Moreover, the pursuit canines that verified that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle demonstrated this by a “demise response”, which told agents that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever indisputably recognized. A considerable lot of Gacy’s casualties had comparable actual portrayals and were accordingly difficult to recognize by absolutely asking people in general. To recognize the people in question, examiners went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in criminological science and facial reproduction. Facial remaking is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and by and large face shape can be helpful in recognizing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, criminological examiners can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in recognizing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial remaking should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial recreations is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-passing photos and data. Notwithstanding, this isn’t really ideal on the grounds that cranial highlights are not generally noticeable or at the correct scale (Downing). To get a practical and more exact portrayal of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a criminological anthropologist are generally essential (Downing). Three-dimensional facial reproduction is finished by figures or high goal, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling checked photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general create results that don’t look fake (Reichs and Craig 491). Now and again, examiners will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a method for facial recreation. Shockingly, it’s anything but an ordinarily utilized strategy, as it expects agents to have some information about the character of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remaining parts, agents can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to distinguish a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial remaking to recognize nine of the bodies found in the creep space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties: Since facial recreation was insufficient to recognize the entirety of the v>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples