The two (2) of the leading causes of the American Revolution.
⢠The Townsend Act
⢠The Boston Massacre
Then, address the following for your selections:
⢠Analyze the cause and effect of two acts passed by the British Parliament on British North America. Which of your two selections do you consider the most significant and why?
⢠Examine and explain the significance of the Declaration of Independence to the development of the American Revolution.
Sample Solution
The Townsend Act of 1767 imposed a series of taxes on goods imported into the colonies, including tea, paper, paint and glass. This sparked intense outrage from the colonists who felt that they were being taxed without having any say in Parliament. This outrage spurred on the beginning of American revolutionary sentiment among colonists.
The Boston Massacre was an event that occurred in Boston on March 5th, 1770 which resulted in five colonists being killed by British soldiers following a scuffle between them and a crowd. After news spread about the incident it further catalyzed colonial anger at Britainâs presence in North America and was used to further rally people behind independence from England.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number>
GET ANSWER
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number>
