In her epilogue to the special issue of the Journal of American History (September 2022) that sought to commemorate the legacies of the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924 a century after their passage, Erika Lee, one of the nationâs leading scholars of U.S. Immigration history, argues that âthe past is not pastâ (399).
As she notes in her conclusion: âIt is not the 1920s all over again, but so much of the racism, xenophobia, and white nationalism that characterized the United States one hundred years ago remains and has even been expanded and normalized. As the essays in this volume make clear, we must siÂmultaneously look backward and forward to actively work toward their demiseâ (407).
What are some of the ways that historians of U.S. immigration history have studied âthe pastâ to better understand and navigate the present and, to some extent, the future? Identify some of the methods, lenses, topics, or themes that they have utilized to make their arguments and broader contributions to this field.
Sample Solution
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi>
GET ANSWER
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi>