We can work on Textual Analysis Essay

Backward-Looking:

  1. How much did you know about the subject before we started?
  2. What process did you go through to produce this piece?
  3. Have you done a similar kind of work in the past (earlier in the year or in a previous grade; in school or out of
    school)?
  4. In what ways have you gotten better at this kind of work?
  5. In what ways do you think you need to improve?
  6. What problems did you encounter while you were working on this piece? How did you solve them?
  7. What resources did you use while working on this piece? Which ones were especially
    helpful? Which ones would you use again?
  8. Does this work tell a story?
    Inward-Looking:
  9. How do you feel about this piece of work? What parts of it do you particularly like? Dislike? Why? What
    did/do you enjoy about this piece or work?
  10. What was especially satisfying to you about either the process or the finished product?
  11. What did/do you find frustrating about it?
  12. What were your standards for this piece of work?
  13. Did you meet your standards?
  14. What were your goals for meeting this piece of work? Did your goals change as you worked on it? Did you
    meet your goals?
  15. What does this piece reveal about you as a learner?
  16. What did you learn about yourself as you worked on this piece?
  17. Have you changed any ideas you used to have on this subject?
  18. Find another piece of work that you did at the beginning of the year to compare and contrast with this
    what changes can you see?
  19. How did those changes come about?
  20. What does that tell you about yourself and how you learn?
    Outward-Looking:
  21. Did you do your work the way other people did theirs?
  22. In what ways did you do it differently?
  23. In what ways was your work or process similar?
  24. If you were the teacher, what comments would you make about this piece?
  25. What grade would you give it? Why?
  26. What the one thing you particularly want people to notice when they look at your work?
  27. What do your classmates particularly notice about your piece when they look at it?
  28. In what ways did your work meet the standards for this assignment?
  29. In what ways did it not meet those standards?
  30. If someone else were looking at the piece, what might they learn about who you are?
    Forward-Looking:
  31. One thing I would like to improve upon is …
  32. What would you change if you had a chance to do this piece over again?
  33. What will you change in the next revision of this piece?
  34. What’s the one thing that you have seen in your classmates’ work or process that you would like to try in
    your next piece?
  35. As you look at this piece, what’s one thing that you would like to try to improve upon?
  36. What’s one goal you would like to set for yourself for next time?
  37. What would you like to spend more time on in school?
  38. What might you want next year’s teacher to know about you (what things you’re good at)?
  39. What things you might want more help with?
  40. What work would you show her to help her understand those things?

You may incorporate WordPress, Screencastify, FlipGrid, TikTok, and any other platform that an employer/University might visit to view your calling card.

Sample Solution

ohn Wayne Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual and psychological mistreatment was instrumental in provoking agent’s curiosity of him as a suspect. John Wayne Gacy was conceived on March 17, 1942, in Chicago, Illinois. Being the main child out of three youngsters, Gacy had a stressed relationship with his dad, who drank vigorously and was frequently injurious towards the whole family (Sullivan and Maiken 48). In 1949, a contractual worker, who was a family companion, would caress Gacy during rides in his truck; be that as it may, Gacy never uncovered these experiences to his folks inspired by a paranoid fear of revenge from his dad (Foreman 54). His dad’s mental maltreatment proceeded into his young grown-up years, and Gacy moved to Las Vegas where he worked quickly in the emergency vehicle administration prior to turning into a funeral home orderly (Sullivan and Maiken 50). As a morgue specialist, Gacy was intensely engaged with the treating cycle and conceded that one night, he moved into the casket of a perished high school kid and stroked the body (Cahill and Ewing 46). Stunned at himself, Gacy re-visitations of Chicago to live with his family and graduates from Northwestern Business College in 1963, and acknowledges an administration student position with Nunn-Bush Shoe Company. In 1964, Gacy is moved to Springfield and meets his future spouse, Marlynn Myers. In Springfield, Gacy has his subsequent gay experience when a collaborator shakily performed oral sex on him (London 11:7). Gacy moves to Waterloo, Iowa, and starts a family with Myers. In any case, after consistently undermining his significant other with whores, Gacy submits his originally known rape in 1967 upon Donald Vorhees. In the coming months, Gacy explicitly manhandles a few different young people and is captured and accused of oral homosexuality (Sullivan and Maiken 60). On December 3, 1968, Gacy is indicted and condemned to ten years at the Anamosa State Penitentiary. Gacy turns into a model prisoner at Anamosa and is conceded parole in June of 1970, an only a short time after his condemning. He had to move to Chicago and live with his mom and notice a 10:00PM time limit. Not exactly a year later, Gacy is accused again of explicitly attacking an adolescent kid however the young didn’t show up in court, so the charges were dropped. Gacy was known by numerous individuals in his locale to be an enthusiastic volunteer and being dynamic in network legislative issues. His part as “Pogo the Clown” the jokester started in 1975 when Gacy joined a nearby “Cheerful Joker” comedian club that routinely performed at gathering pledges occasions. On January 3, 1972, Gacy submits his first homicide of Timothy McCoy, a 16-year old kid making a trip from Michigan to Omaha. Asserting that McCoy went into his room using a kitchen blade, Gacy gets into an actual quarrel with McCoy prior to cutting him consistently in the chest. Subsequent to understanding that McCoy had absentmindedly strolled into the stay with the blade while attempting to plan breakfast, Gacy covers the body in his creep space. Gacy conceded in the meetings following his capture that slaughtering McCoy gave him a “mind-desensitizing climax”, expressing that this homicide was the point at which he “understood demise was a definitive rush” (Cahill and Ewing 349). Just about 2 years after the fact, Gacy submits his second homicide of a unidentified youngster. Gacy choked the kid prior to stuffing the body in his storeroom prior to covering him (Cahill 349). In 1975, Gacy’s business was developing rapidly and his craving for youngsters developed with it. Gacy frequently tricked youngsters under his work to his home, persuading them to place themselves in binds, and assaulting and tormenting them prior to choking them (Cahill 169-170). The majority of Gacy’s homicides occurred somewhere in the range of 1976 and 1978, the first of this time occurring in April 1976. A large number of the adolescents that were killed during this time were covered in a creep space under Gacy’s home. For the rest of the killings, Gacy confessed to losing five bodies the I-55 scaffold into the Des Plaines River; nonetheless, just four of the bodies were ever recuperated (Linedecker 152). In December 1978, Gacy meets Robert Jerome Piest, a 15-year old kid working at a drug store and extends to him an employment opportunity at Gacy’s firm. Piest advises his mom regarding this and neglects to restore that night. The Piest family records a missing individual’s report and the drug specialist illuminates police that Gacy would probably be the man that Jerome addressed about a work. When addressed by the police, Gacy denied any contribution in Piest’s vanishing. Be that as it may, the police were not persuaded, and Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual maltreatment and battery incited the police to look through his home. Among the things found at Gacy’s home were a 1975 secondary school class ring with the initials J.A.S., different driver’s licenses, binds, apparel that was excessively little for Gacy, and a receipt for the drug store that Piest had worked at. Throughout the following not many days, specialists got various calls and tips about Gacy’s rapes and the strange vanishings of Gacy’s workers. The class ring was at last followed back to John A. Szyc, one of Gacy’s casualties in 1977. Futhermore, after looking at Gacy’s vehicle, agents found a little bunch of strands taking after human hair, which were shipped off the labs for additional examination. That very night, search canines were utilized to identify any hint of Piest in Gacy’s vehicle, and one of the canines showed that Piest had, actually, been available in the vehicle. On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of consistent police reconnaissance and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 killings and advises his legal counselor and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the creep space and the stream. 26 casualties were found in the slither space and 4 in the waterway. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 homicides, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a madness request however was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few legal pointers that examiners used to attach Gacy to the homicides. A portion of these include fiber examination, dental and radiology records, utilizing the disintegration cycle of the human body, and facial reproduction in distinguishing the people in question. Agents discovered strands that looked like human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the creep space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners likewise discovered strands that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar region. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the strands, which would later straightforwardly attach Gacy to the wrongdoings. The filaments in Gacy’s vehicle were dissected by scientific researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Moreover, the inquiry canines that confirmed that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle demonstrated this by a “passing response”, which told specialists that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever convincingly distinguished. A significant number of Gacy’s casualties had comparative actual depictions and were along these lines hard to distinguish by simply asking people in general. To recognize the people in question, agents went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in scientific science and facial remaking. Facial remaking is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and by and large face shape can be helpful in distinguishing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, measurable specialists can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in distinguishing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial recreation should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial reproductions is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-demise photos and data. Notwithstanding, this isn’t really ideal in light of the fact that cranial highlights are not generally noticeable or at the correct scale (Downing). To get a reasonable and more exact portrayal of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a measurable anthropologist are generally important (Downing). Three-dimensional facial recreation is finished by models or high goal, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling examined photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general deliver results that don’t look counterfeit (Reichs and Craig 491). Some of the time, examiners will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a method for facial reproduction. Lamentably, it’s anything but a usually utilized strategy, as it expects examiners to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remaining parts, examiners can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to distinguish a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial remaking to distinguish nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties: Since facial remaking was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, specialists got DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3). The excess casualties were distinguished utilizing dental and radiology records. Since dental polish is harder than bone, teeth outlive tissue and now and then bone when the body deteriorates. Teeth are truly solid in distinguishing casualties, as they will in general uncover propensities about the individual, for example, nail gnawing, granulating and pressure propensities, lip gnawing, and holding (Ryan 254). Besides, the top of the mouth, which frames a curve, is special to every person fit as a fiddle, size, and form. Teeth additionally have singular qualities that are interesting t>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples