Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Telemedicine system selection plan by conducting a system evaluation
Oââââââââââââââââââââââverview: In this milestone, you will continue to develop your telemedicine system selection plan by conducting a system evaluation and an assessment of the impact of the vendor solution on revenue cycle management. Prompt: In this milestone, you will complete a system evaluation of the four potential vendor solutions using the benchmarks developed in Milestone One. Refer to the LifeStar Hospital case study for assistance completing this milestone. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: IV. System Evaluation: In this section, you will evaluate the four vendor solutions for how they address the previously established benchmarks. In addition, you will assess the impact of the vendor solutions on the hospitalâs revenue cycle management. A. Develop a matrix that evaluates the vendor solutions against the previously created benchmarks. Place this matrix in the appendix of your plan. B. Summarize the key positive and negative aspects of each vendor solution based on the vendor evaluation. C. Referring to the vendor evaluation, explain where you are willing to negotiate with ââââââââââââââââââââââthe vendors to address their negative aspects. D. Revenue Cycle Management: Now that you have evaluated the vendors based on the developed benchmarks, you will assess the impact of implementing a vendor solution on the hospitalâs revenue cycle management. i. Determine the potential impact of the vendor solution on the revenue cycle in the hospital. ii. Propose strategies for implementing the vendor solution while maintaining normal business operations in revenue cycle management. Consider what strategies you will put in place to ensure business continues as usual. iii. Describe the relevant regulations that will be impacted by the implementation of the vendor technology in the hospital. iv. Explain how you will ensure compliance of the new vendor technology with previously described regulations. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your Milestone Three submission must be 2â3 pages in length and written in APA format: Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Sample Solution
s âwe may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).â In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldnât this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: âit is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).â In addition, Vittola expresses the extent of military tactics used, but never reaches a conclusion whether itâs lawful or not to proceed these actions, as he constantly found a middle ground, where it can be lawful to do such things but never always (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is supported by Frowe, who measures the legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after a war. For example, one cannot simply nuke the terrorist groups throughout the middle-east, because it is not only proportional, it will damage the whole population, an unintended consequence. More importantly, the soldiers must have the right intention in what they are going to achieve, sacrificing the costs to their actions. For example: if soldiers want to execute all prisoners of war, they must do it for the right intention and for a just cause, proportional to the harm done to them. This is supported by Vittola: ânot always lawful to execute all combatantsâ¦we must take account⦠scale of the injury inflicted by the enemy.â This is further supported by Frowe approach, which is a lot more moral than Vittolaâs view but implies the same agendas: âcanât be punished simply for fighting.â This means one cannot simply punish another because they have been a combatant. They must be treated as humanely as possible. However, the situation is escalated if killing them can lead to peace and security, within the interes>
GET ANSWER
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Follow us
s âwe may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).â In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldnât this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: âit is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).â In addition, Vittola expresses the extent of military tactics used, but never reaches a conclusion whether itâs lawful or not to proceed these actions, as he constantly found a middle ground, where it can be lawful to do such things but never always (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is supported by Frowe, who measures the legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after a war. For example, one cannot simply nuke the terrorist groups throughout the middle-east, because it is not only proportional, it will damage the whole population, an unintended consequence. More importantly, the soldiers must have the right intention in what they are going to achieve, sacrificing the costs to their actions. For example: if soldiers want to execute all prisoners of war, they must do it for the right intention and for a just cause, proportional to the harm done to them. This is supported by Vittola: ânot always lawful to execute all combatantsâ¦we must take account⦠scale of the injury inflicted by the enemy.â This is further supported by Frowe approach, which is a lot more moral than Vittolaâs view but implies the same agendas: âcanât be punished simply for fighting.â This means one cannot simply punish another because they have been a combatant. They must be treated as humanely as possible. However, the situation is escalated if killing them can lead to peace and security, within the interes>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
