Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Summarizing Court Cases Affecting Higher Education
you are given an opportunity to review court cases and explore how they have impacted the higher education landscape.
Instructions Pick three court cases that have an impact on higher education. Briefly describe the cases. Summarize the implications of the case on higher education institutions by answering the following questions:. What are the implications? What liability does the higher education institution have in the implementation of the law? Be specific with elements that should be implemented to ensure that the institution is upholding the law.
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Follow us
Sample Answer
Three Landmark Court Cases Impacting Higher Education
1. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
Implications for Higher Education:
Student Speech Rights: This case established that students retain their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and expression on school grounds, unless it disrupts the educational process. Â
Institutional Liability:Higher education institutions must balance students’ rights to free speech with the need to maintain order and a conducive learning environment.
Full Answer Section
Implementation: Institutions should develop clear policies regarding student speech, ensuring that restrictions are reasonable and narrowly tailored. They should also provide training for faculty and staff on how to handle student expression, particularly in cases of controversial or unpopular speech.
2. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (2000)
Implications for Higher Education:
Student Fees for Student Activities: This case upheld the right of public universities to charge mandatory student activity fees, even if students disagree with the activities or organizations funded by those fees. Â
Institutional Liability: Institutions must ensure that student activity fees are used for legitimate student activities and that the fee structure is fair and transparent.
Implementation: Institutions should establish clear guidelines for the allocation of student activity fees, ensuring that they are used for purposes that benefit the entire student body. They should also provide opportunities for students to voice their concerns and participate in decision-making processes related to fee allocation.
3. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)
Implications for Higher Education:
Affirmative Action in Admissions: This case upheld the use of race as one factor in college admissions, as long as it is part of a holistic review process that considers individual merit. Â
Institutional Liability: Institutions must adhere to strict guidelines when considering race as a factor in admissions. They must avoid quotas and use race as one of many factors in a holistic review.
Implementation: Institutions should develop comprehensive diversity and inclusion plans that promote diversity in all aspects of campus life. They should also provide training for admissions officers to ensure that they understand and comply with affirmative action guidelines.
These landmark cases have significantly shaped the legal landscape of higher education. By understanding their implications, institutions can ensure that they are operating in compliance with the law while upholding their mission to provide a quality education to all students.
This question has been answered.
Get Answer
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
