Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Strengths and weaknesses of an infrastructure sector
The best way to identify strengths and weaknesses of an infrastructure sector is conducting a survey or vulnerability assessment. Following the parameters of the type of assessment tool being used, any weaknesses in the critical infrastructure component will be noted and brought to attention to the agencies responsible for the component. Many tools contain a checklist, which is used to eliminate the possibility of overlooking a vulnerability factor. Address the following in a 5â7-page paper: Conduct a vulnerability analysis on a component of critical infrastructure of your choice. You may select the vulnerability assessment method or tool, but you must fully explain the assessment methodology in your final report. In your report, you must address the following questions: What vulnerability assessment method did you use? Explain why. What strengths did you find with regard to your selected critical infrastructure component? Explain in detail. What vulnerabilities did you find associated with your selected critical infrastructure component? Explain in detail. Is there any information that you would require for a more thorough analysis? Explain why or why not. What challenges did you encounter? Explain. How did you overcome these challenges? Explain
Sample Solution
ritish ships were superior in design to both the French and Spanish and gave the British an edge in battle. Ships in the 1800sâ were universally comprised of taught composite oak planks laid over a keel, held in place by decks. Ships were equipped with an assortment of masts and sails for propulsion and stability â hence the name of the era, âAge of Sailâ. All ships were designed empirically by shipwrights. There were no blueprints which meant some nations were more adept in the craft than others. According to Rickard, âNelson could safely assume⦠any British ship was the superior of a French or Spanish ship.â (Rickard, 2002). In the National Archives, officer letters to the admiralty consistently differ from Rickards view, often praising the enemy (National-Archives, 1809). However, N.A.M Rodgers suggests that officers had a âvested interestâ (Rodger, 2004) in portraying the enemy as formidable as possible because of both the monetary reward and honour gained would be greater. Therefore, officer accounts written to the Admiralty were often misleading due to exaggeration. Technological advantages of British ships also prove their superiority over the French. The British employed unique innovations in their ships such as the gunlock in the Battle of Trafalgar which would not be seen in the French Navy for the next 30 years who according to Snow used a match, described as a âmore primitive methodâ (Snow, 2018). The gunlock permitted much more accurate firing due to the more predictable discharge of the gun. British ships also used copper plated bottoms of their ships to reduce drag from barnacles. During the battle, the British were at a numerical disadvantage butand the superior craftsmanship and technology of the British fleet was important to decisive in the outcome. Although through the better-quality ships of the British were, the purpose instituted for them became easier to sail and more efficient, better quality ships were not the decisive in the Battle of Trafalgar, but they did c ontribute to the British making up their numerical deficit in comparison to the French fleet. I would argue that Tactics were also not thedid not prove decisive factor in the Battle of Trafalgar. When it came to tactics, most âship of the lineâ naval engagements fought in the âNapoleonic Warsâ followed a common pattern. As Bennet states, fleets practicedâtactical orthodoxyâ (Bennet, 2004), a method of naval fighting dating back a hundred years; Aa line of ships â hence the name âship of the lineâ â sailed astern of one another. they would sail towards another line of ships similarly arranged on the same tack. The two lines would position themselves side by side, exchanging broadsides until one side would retreat or surrender. The Battle of Trafalgar was an exception to this tactical rule, with Lord Nelson forming two lines of ship>
ritish ships were superior in design to both the French and Spanish and gave the British an edge in battle. Ships in the 1800sâ were universally comprised of taught composite oak planks laid over a keel, held in place by decks. Ships were equipped with an assortment of masts and sails for propulsion and stability â hence the name of the era, âAge of Sailâ. All ships were designed empirically by shipwrights. There were no blueprints which meant some nations were more adept in the craft than others. According to Rickard, âNelson could safely assume⦠any British ship was the superior of a French or Spanish ship.â (Rickard, 2002). In the National Archives, officer letters to the admiralty consistently differ from Rickards view, often praising the enemy (National-Archives, 1809). However, N.A.M Rodgers suggests that officers had a âvested interestâ (Rodger, 2004) in portraying the enemy as formidable as possible because of both the monetary reward and honour gained would be greater. Therefore, officer accounts written to the Admiralty were often misleading due to exaggeration. Technological advantages of British ships also prove their superiority over the French. The British employed unique innovations in their ships such as the gunlock in the Battle of Trafalgar which would not be seen in the French Navy for the next 30 years who according to Snow used a match, described as a âmore primitive methodâ (Snow, 2018). The gunlock permitted much more accurate firing due to the more predictable discharge of the gun. British ships also used copper plated bottoms of their ships to reduce drag from barnacles. During the battle, the British were at a numerical disadvantage butand the superior craftsmanship and technology of the British fleet was important to decisive in the outcome. Although through the better-quality ships of the British were, the purpose instituted for them became easier to sail and more efficient, better quality ships were not the decisive in the Battle of Trafalgar, but they did c ontribute to the British making up their numerical deficit in comparison to the French fleet. I would argue that Tactics were also not thedid not prove decisive factor in the Battle of Trafalgar. When it came to tactics, most âship of the lineâ naval engagements fought in the âNapoleonic Warsâ followed a common pattern. As Bennet states, fleets practicedâtactical orthodoxyâ (Bennet, 2004), a method of naval fighting dating back a hundred years; Aa line of ships â hence the name âship of the lineâ â sailed astern of one another. they would sail towards another line of ships similarly arranged on the same tack. The two lines would position themselves side by side, exchanging broadsides until one side would retreat or surrender. The Battle of Trafalgar was an exception to this tactical rule, with Lord Nelson forming two lines of ship>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals