We can work on Social Media and consumer engagement

Research Project Proposal Social Media and consumer engagement
15
Bibliography
Dolan Rebecca, Conduit Jodie, Frethey Bentham, Fahy John, Goodman Steve, (2019), Social media
engagement behaviour, European Journal of Marketing, 6(2), pp.18-44.
Dolan Rebecca, Conduit Jodie, Fahy John, Goodman Steve, (2017), ‘Social media: communication
strategies, engagement and future research directions’, International Journal of Wine Business
Research, Vol. 29 Issue: 1, pp.2-19, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-04-2016-0013,
[Accessed 23 April 2019].
Jochen Wirtz, Anouk den Ambtman, Josée Bloemer. Csilla Horváth, Ramaseshan B, Joris Van De
Klundert. Zeynep Gurhan Canli., Jay Kandampully, (2013), ‘Managing Brands and Customer
Engagement in Online Brand Communities’, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 24 Issue: 3,
pp.223-244, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231311326978 [Accessed 23 April 2019]
Katarzyna Zyminkowska , (2015), ‘Customer Engagement Behavior in the Fashion Industry’,
International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal – Vol. 1, Issue: 4, pp.48
Tong,Y, (2009), ‘A study of e-recruitment technology adoption in Malaysia’, Industrial Management
and Data Systems, Vol. 109 No. 2, pp. 281-300.
Verhoef P, Reinartz W, Krafft M, (2010), ‘Customer Engagement as a New Perspective in Customer
Management’, Journal of Service Research, 13(3), pp.247-252.
Vitor Moura, Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray, Carlos Lourenco, (2019),‘ Consumer engagement on social
media: insights from a virtual brand community’, Qualitative Market Research: An International
Journal, Vol.22.1,14-32.
Willis Michelle, (2019), ‘The Dynamics of Social Media Marketing Content and Customer
Retention.’ Leveraging Computer-Mediated Marketing Environments, CGI Global.
Wu I, Chen J, (2005), ‘An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of online
tax: an empirical study’, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 62 No. 6, pp. 784-808
References
Ambler Tim, Chris Styles, (1997), ‘Brand development versus new product development: toward a
process model of extension decisions’, Journal of Product & Brand Management Vol.6. No.4, pp.222-
234.
Ashley C, Tuten T, (2015), ‘Creative strategies in social media marketing: an exploratory study of
branded social content and consumer engagement’, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 32, Issue 1,
pp.15-27.
Research Project Proposal Social Media and consumer engagement
16
Dawson C, (2019), ‘Introduction to research methods’. 5th ed. London: Robinson, pp.22-32.
Denscombe M, (2014), ‘The Good research guide’, 5th edition, Maidenhead, England: McGrawHill/Open University Press, pp.146-150.
Gravetter F, Forzano L, (2018), ‘Research methods for the behavioural sciences’. 6th ed. Boston:
Cengage, pp.11-15.
Hallock W, Roggeveen A, Crittenden V, (2016), ‘Social media and customer engagement: dyadic
word of mouth’, Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.12, Issue 3, pp.185-204.
Hong J, Lee O, Suh W, (2013), ‘A study of the continuous usage intention of social software in the
context of instant messaging’, Online Information Review, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 692-710.
Hoyer W.D, Chandy R, Dorotic M, Krafft M, Singh S.S, (2010), ‘Consumer co-creation in new product
development’, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 283-296.
Jin X, Cheung C, Lee M, Chen H, (2009), ‘How to keep members using the information in a
computer-supported social network’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 1172-1181.
John Koetsier S, (2019), Facebook: 15 million businesses, companies, and organizations now have a
Facebook page, Available at: https://venturebeat.com/2013/03/05/facebook-15-million-businessescompanies-and-organizations-now-have-a-facebook-page/, [Accessed 18 Apr. 2019].
Kumar V, Aksoy L, Donkers B, Venkatesan R, Wiesel T, (2010), ‘Undervalued or Overvalued
Customers: Capturing Total Customer Engagement Value’, Journal of Service Research Vol. 13(3).
Linda D. Hollebeek, Mark S. Glynn, Roderick J. Brodie, (2014), ‘Consumer Brand Engagement in
Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation’, Journal of Interactive
Marketing, Vol.28, pp.149–165.
Mangold W.G, Faulds D.J, (2009), ‘Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix’,
Business Horizons, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 357-365.
Mason R, Huff K, (2018), ‘The effect of format and device on the performance and usability of webbased questionnaires’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, pp.271-280, Available
at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2018.1542150, [Accessed 18 May 2019].
Muniz, Albert M, Jr O’Guinn, Thomas, C, (2001), ‘Brand community’, Journal of Consumer Research,
Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 412-432.
Research Project Proposal Social Media and consumer engagement
17
Nelson-Field K, Taylor J, (2019), ‘Facebook fans: A fan for life’? Available at:
https://www.warc.com/Content/b44fad20-c6f7-4d44-aac2-da9ea7cf8383 [Accessed 16 Apr. 2019].
Ong C, Day M, (2010), ‘An integrated evaluation model of user satisfaction with social media
services’, IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration, pp. 195-200.
Rania Hussein, Salah Hassan, (2017), ‘Customer engagement on social media: how to enhance
continuation of use’, Online Information Review, Vol. 41, Issue: 7, pp.1006-1028
Sashi C, (2012), ‘Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media’, Management
Decision, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 253-272.
Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A, (2019), Research methods for business students, 8th edition, New
York: Pearson, pp.128-135.
Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L, Bruns A, Neuberger C, (2014), ‘Social media analytics’, Business &
Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 6, pp. 89-96.
Taylor S, Bogdan R, DeVault M, Taylor S, (2015), ‘Introduction to qualitative research methods’, 4th
edition, New Jersey: John Wiley and sons, pp. 29-32.
Van Dorn, Lemon K, Mittal V, Nass S, Pick D, Pirner P, Verhoef C, (2010), ‘Customer Engagement
Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions’, Journal of Service Research, Vol.13(3),
pp.204.
Vivek S, Beatty S, Morgan M, (2012), ‘Customer Engagement: Exploring Customer Relationships
Beyond Purchase’, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, pp.124-149.
Wirtz B, Schilke O, Ullrich S, (2010), ‘Strategic development of business models: implications of web
2.0 for creating value on the Internet’, Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, Issue 2, pp. 272-290.

Sample Solution

Talk about how various talks come to advise our more extensive understanding regarding youth. Adolescence is affected by a few central point including child rearing, society, history and culture. Of these culture has the most importance on a national scale as far as the way a youngster in raised and for giving the points and desires as the kid advances through to adulthood. The term youth alludes to a period from birth to immaturity and speaks to a period during which the body experiences physiological and intellectual turn of events. The impression of adolescence was truly evolved in the seventeenth and eighteenth hundreds of years through instructive hypotheses that were progressed by savants, for example, John Locke. This remembered observational thoughts for youngster improvement where information is picked up as a matter of fact. Notwithstanding, before this were treated as junior grown-ups and were frequently abused. In any case, later twentieth century logicians, for example, Philippe Ariès have proposed that adolescence is certainly not a characteristic event yet an idea designed by society and which he expounded on in his book “Hundreds of years of Childhood”. Culture alludes to the ways of life, social conduct and personality of a general public, mirroring the customs of a spot. Everybody’s character is based around the way of life in which they have been raised, where individuals can characterize themselves in a network and decide to characterize themselves around others. In youth, kids learn through watching, testing and speaking with others inside their social condition and are thusly intensely impacted by the network. The word ‘culture’ is difficult to characterize as not every person has a similar childhood, not every person has precisely the same culture, because of contrasts in confidence, convictions, language and society. In spite of the fact that individuals see the world in comparative manners, it isn’t generally equivalent to they are instructed. The world is getting progressively increasingly various, “it’s eternity” (Whitebook refered to in Diaz Soto, 2000: 143). It is that distinction in networks, in social orders which challenge individuals. In the event that there was little assorted variety kids would not comprehend or find out about the significance of decent variety. It is the acknowledgment and regard for various traditions and conventions that offers ascend to the term multiculturism, which takes into consideration the tranquil concurrence of various societies in close limits. Culture to many individuals intends to be conventional, and to numerous it is essential to keep up a particular customary lifestyle. A few people acquire their living from the way of life the world expects and thinks they have and thus trust it is critical to keep up their way of life. Individuals can shroud their cutting edge culture to imagine culture is as yet equivalent to their chronicled culture. Be that as it may, culture isn’t shallow. Social anthropologists are prepared in the understanding of account, custom and representative conduct to help recognize patterns. Culture can be utilized to take a gander at the advancement of society inside a network, in light of the degree of modernity, which can offer ascent to class-based differentiations. In this regard the job of instruction is significant as it is obvious that better training offers ascend to increasingly modern degrees of culture. Cozy connections acquaint small kids with the social apparatuses (Vygotsky) through which their insight and comprehension develop and language creates. Language is sharing information, aptitudes and understanding, and in this manner creates individual character all through youth. Significant arrangement inquiries regarding the spot of culture in youth programs have been inquired. This is likewise significant as to the capacity of youth programs in the every day lives of little youngsters, families and networks. Along these lines, ‘training for all’ objectives can’t be executed in a vacuum, without representing the particular conditions of kids. Varieties in kids’ turn of events and learning are molded by social qualities, just as by financial and auxiliary imbalances. This strain is particularly obvious with regards to quick social change and relocation, particularly for minority bunch youngsters experiencing childhood in mind boggling, pluralistic social orders. Under these conditions youngsters experience contending qualities and desires, and are hence at more serious danger of instructive prohibition. Hardman’s proposal depicts how she sees ‘kids as individuals to be concentrated in their own right, and not similarly as containers of grown-up instructing’. Thus, Hardman proposes that kids ‘existed inside a different subculture, and had their own particular manners of reasoning, their own perspectives, and their own social understandings as games and rhymes’ (Barnes and Kehily, p37). Aries did the primary verifiable orderly investigation of youth. Up until genuinely late occasions a huge extent of newborn children didn’t make due to adulthood – the greater part of the youngster populace being lost in numerous social orders because of hunger and malady. Aries guessed that high newborn child mortality made it exceptionally hard for guardians to get excessively close or connected to their kids, or to ‘sentimentalize’ them, on the off chance that they were to endure incredible enthusiastic agony on losing them. Ariès explore uncovered that the term ‘adolescence’ first showed up and was created inside the sixteenth and seventeenth hundreds of years. His exploration produced incredible enthusiasm for the historical backdrop of adolescence among history specialists, sociologists and therapists. A more extensive glance at the historical backdrop of adolescence has been embraced by Cunningham, who indicated that from the eighteenth century onwards ‘a mass of private life’ was raised between the family and the more extensive society (Cunningham, 1995: 5), with network amiability on the melt away. For Cunningham, Ariès was more inspired by youth than in kids, and in ‘family’ more as a thought (in the same place: 6). Much youngster brain science (.g. Piaget) holds that there are phases of advancement through which all kids must go towards adulthood. Be that as it may, interestingly, in numerous settings youth has been shortened, permitting no chance of an adolescence of the sort we routinely underestimate. Lowe, focuses to a nearly ongoing glorification of youth as depicted in books, films and on TV, where ‘adolescence’ itself experienced a social redefinition. In Britain, during the Industrial Revolution, “youth implied various things in varying areas, contingent on specific neighborhood examples of industrialisation” (Lowe, 2004: 68). Production line proprietors saw the chance of increasing an exceptionally modest work power from the prospering towns. A large number of youthful stranded youngsters were taken significant distances from their homes and bound in close to jail like conditions for extended periods of time of modern work. Everyday environments were stuffed and unfortunate, with horrifying endurance rates. A moderately new ‘development’ of the kid was started during the nineteenth century, where the youngster was viewed as the object of pity or generosity. Reformers, for example, Robert Peel and William Wilberforce, frightened at kids’ conditions, helped start government enactment to ensure the kid. Numerous Acts of Parliament made it harder for deceitful bosses to misuse kids. This was the first genuine commitment of the state in quite a while present day structure with kids. By controlling the conditions and setting least norms, the state turned into the mediator of youngsters’ prosperity. Mainstream training was ostensibly determined as much by an assurance to force a social control as by any soul of good cause, as featured by Lowe who expressed “without a doubt no occurrence that ordinary hours, accommodation to the requests of the chime, and the prepared acknowledgment of an arrangement of remunerations and discipline.” (Lowe, 2004:68). The spread of mass/all inclusive tutoring had various impacts. It empowered youth to be seen as a lot of stages through which youngsters advanced normally including nursery, baby, junior and optional instruction. Such tutoring included a normalization of adolescence. In this manner, it turned out to be progressively simple to recognize ‘layouts’ of youth, to which ‘format’ arrangements c ould then be applied and empowered the gendering of adolescence. In this way, we see a for all time changed perspective on the manners by which the State should manage the youngster. “Since the 1880s offices have showed up which are profoundly persuasive in deciding society’s perspective on adolescence” (Lowe, 2004:68), and the scope of regions wherein the State has felt it fitting to mediate towards youngsters has extended significantly. The social setting of youth is significant and has been utilized to put the overall situation of the kid in the public eye, and how they see the adolescence of the youngster. As society turns out to be progressively multiracial, multilingual, and multicultural, so too develops the requirement for the capacities of instructors to help the improvement of youngsters by ingraining in them the apparatuses they have to live respectively consciously and rise up to bias. Teachers and scientists have been approached to reconsider associations with the individuals who are more youthful in manners that perceive office, voice, and complex ways of life just as a proceeded with battle for social equity. The significance of tuning in to kids and review them as dynamic social specialists has been featured. This has brought about an assessment of the force connections and perspectives on youngsters as specialists in their day by day lives. A kid’s worth differs across societies and social classes, ages and families consider advancement to be reliant on the social and social encounters of the kid, not as a general and unvarying procedure. The movement of youngsters is dictated by their encounters, the collaborations they have with others and what their networks see as typical and fitting turn of events. Culture and social setting impact the youth worldview, where it more than just a conviction framework, with a series of expectations, ideas, values, and>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples