Public administrators are required to navigate both organizational and environmental politics. Public administrators need support from the general public, elected officials, community leaders, and other government officials to maintain support for the organizations they lead. In Chapter 12, the textbook author discusses a variety of influence tactics. Consider that your organization needs to influence elected officials, citizens, and community leaders for an important new initiative. What influence tactic do you think would be most effective for the elected official, for the citizen, and for the community leader? Why do you think these tactics would be most impactful?
Part 2
Please response to this post
The exchange tactic would be appropriate for elected officials. Politicians always desire a favorable public image; thus, it would be easy to convince them to support the initiative and earn some credit for it. Insipational appeals would help draw the citizens’ attention to the project. Citizens are emotional people and they go with the flow. It would be easy to convince them to participate in the initiative by appealing to their emotions and values. Finally, rational persuation would work with community leaders. These people do not necessarily hold any positional of power, but they have much influence over society. Community leaders are mostly sober-minded, and thus, they would be ready to listen to logical reasoning.
DB 7
Complete the following:
Considering the four functions of organizational culture discussed in our textbook, which function is most important for organizational socialization? Why is this function important for socialization? Is a strong organizational culture important for effective organizational socialization? Why, or why not?
DB 8
Which of the six causes of resistance to change do you think is the most important? Why is this the most important cause of resistance to change public administrators should understand? How can you take what you have learned about resistance to change in this course into your current or future career?
Sample Solution
Financial opportunity prompts public fulfillment. Private enterprise gives more opportunity, financial etc., than socialism. Numerous things characteristic to financial prosperity, like substance with the public authority framework, the presence of development, rivalry, and worldwide economies. Every one of these fundamental ascribes of financial prosperity are associated with private enterprise and the impacts it has on the world. Private enterprise is more fruitful in keeping a steady government and protecting harmony rather than socialism, since private enterprise gives the crowded more monetary opportunity. Financial Standards like unrestricted economy private enterprise, Keynesianism, and communism affect the Virus War. Keynesianism is the most un-outrageous of these standards since it advocates for government impedance in the midst of emergency, like downturns. Unregulated economy private enterprise is the idea of the economy being liberated from government control. The market depends on the requirements of the makers and customers. Milton Friedman and Adam Smith two or three trailblazers of the possibility of uncontrolled economies, and the possibility that the economy adjust itself. Smith accepted that the economy didn’t should be altered, on the grounds that organic market represented the progressions with practically no necessary altering. This is something contrary to communist Financial aspects, which is the idea that the business sectors should be controlled and arranged. Communist supporters accept that private enterprise is basically a phase in the process expected to arrive at the ultimate objective of a controlled market. These are two clashing thoughts that frequently isolated the political left side from the right. Free enterprise has suggestions a long ways past monetary viewpoints. Nations or state run administrations with socialist monetary frameworks have encountered more political uprisings and upsets than nations with entrepreneur economies. The Virus War furnishes verification of how nations with entrepreneur economies win above socialist economies. Hong Kong exhibits how monetary opportunity prompts more joyful individuals, and blissful individuals normally don’t endeavor to oust government frameworks. Free enterprise is a powerful technique for avoidi>
GET ANSWER
Financial opportunity prompts public fulfillment. Private enterprise gives more opportunity, financial etc., than socialism. Numerous things characteristic to financial prosperity, like substance with the public authority framework, the presence of development, rivalry, and worldwide economies. Every one of these fundamental ascribes of financial prosperity are associated with private enterprise and the impacts it has on the world. Private enterprise is more fruitful in keeping a steady government and protecting harmony rather than socialism, since private enterprise gives the crowded more monetary opportunity. Financial Standards like unrestricted economy private enterprise, Keynesianism, and communism affect the Virus War. Keynesianism is the most un-outrageous of these standards since it advocates for government impedance in the midst of emergency, like downturns. Unregulated economy private enterprise is the idea of the economy being liberated from government control. The market depends on the requirements of the makers and customers. Milton Friedman and Adam Smith two or three trailblazers of the possibility of uncontrolled economies, and the possibility that the economy adjust itself. Smith accepted that the economy didn’t should be altered, on the grounds that organic market represented the progressions with practically no necessary altering. This is something contrary to communist Financial aspects, which is the idea that the business sectors should be controlled and arranged. Communist supporters accept that private enterprise is basically a phase in the process expected to arrive at the ultimate objective of a controlled market. These are two clashing thoughts that frequently isolated the political left side from the right. Free enterprise has suggestions a long ways past monetary viewpoints. Nations or state run administrations with socialist monetary frameworks have encountered more political uprisings and upsets than nations with entrepreneur economies. The Virus War furnishes verification of how nations with entrepreneur economies win above socialist economies. Hong Kong exhibits how monetary opportunity prompts more joyful individuals, and blissful individuals normally don’t endeavor to oust government frameworks. Free enterprise is a powerful technique for avoidi>
