To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the  Problem Description Assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using  the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists” available in the textbook  appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type  of evidence within the resource.

Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research  studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your  narrative description. Only research studies used to support your  intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the “Evaluation  Table Template” available in the textbook appendix or use the  “Evaluation Table Template” resource as an adaptable template.

Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page  and references) that presents the research support for the project’s  problem and proposed solution. Make sure to include:

Description of the search method (i.e., databases, keywords,  criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit  your criteria).
Summarization of all of the research studies used as evidence. The  essential components of each study need to be described so that readers  can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and  limitations.
Description of the validity of the internal and external research.

It is essential to make sure that the research support for the  proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from  peer-reviewed professional journal articles.

Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the  evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist  information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for  the final paper.