Review the following terms and concepts discussed this week to prepare for this assignment:
organizational structure
organizational culture
inertia
Holacracy
PESTEL model
List a minimum of 2 references researched for this Journal assignment.
Create a Word doc and title it Strategic Management Research Journal Part 3.
Write a 525- to 700-word response to the following prompts in your journal entry:
Assess whether Caterpillar Inc. is using the appropriate measures to verify its strategic effectiveness.
Summarize Caterpillar Inc.âs organizational structure.
Determine whether Caterpillar Inc.âs organizational structure is considered a traditional organizational structure or a Holacracy.
Justify why itâs important for Caterpillar Inc.âs leadership team to study and understand the companyâs internal and external environments.
Evaluate Caterpillar Inc.âs competitive position and how they have responded to shifts in the external and internal environments.
Recommend strategies in operational changes to support Caterpillarâs strategic plan, future business decisions, and improvement in business performance.
Sample Solution
other area of the brain that can predict criminal behavior is the amygdala. The amygdala is inside of the temporal lobe of the brain and functionally involves emotions particularly controlling fear, anger and pleasure. âThe amygdala has received considerable attention, with numerous studies association psychopathy with abnormal size, shape, or activity of this subcortical structure that associates with structural and functional deficitsâ (Koenigs). Even though neuroscience has developed immensely throughout the years, predicting criminal behavior through scans can produce a reverse-inference error. âThe reverse-inference error is especially prevalent in the interpretation of brain activity in functional neuroimaging studiesâ (Choi). As previously stated, the reliance of electroencephalogram data may show the activity within the brain, but depending on the section, the brain may be overactive during such time. When looking at an individualâs amygdala that is characterized as abnormal and overactive can be argued to the point of reverse-inference error due to trying to distinguish what is a normal or abnormal sign of the brainâs fear center (Choi). Brain Scans Versus Self-Report: Brain scans provide more complexity to detect brain impairments in individuals despite a clinical psychologistâs findings. A common problem within neurolaw is the group to individual inference problem. Psychologists often identify associations of brain defects with impairments by comparing a group of subjects with a localized defect to a group of subjects without the defect; this can result in overlapping due to the idea that impaired patients may have better control over a specific area in regard to the healthy controls and vice versa (Choi). The issue with psychological based evidence is that very few neuroimaging-based tests are used in psychiatric diagnosis which lacks the sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be reliable enough for inclusion in diagnostic criteriaâ (Choi). When looking at the defendants self-reporting of their behavior, brain scans often reveal more than those reports suggest. âWhile most peopleâs self-reports are not very accurate, they do not realize their self-reports are wrong so often in predicting future behavior. The brain seems to reveal something important that we may not even realizeâ (University of California). Jurors understanding of neuroscientific evidence is based upon whether they make a conn>
other area of the brain that can predict criminal behavior is the amygdala. The amygdala is inside of the temporal lobe of the brain and functionally involves emotions particularly controlling fear, anger and pleasure. âThe amygdala has received considerable attention, with numerous studies association psychopathy with abnormal size, shape, or activity of this subcortical structure that associates with structural and functional deficitsâ (Koenigs). Even though neuroscience has developed immensely throughout the years, predicting criminal behavior through scans can produce a reverse-inference error. âThe reverse-inference error is especially prevalent in the interpretation of brain activity in functional neuroimaging studiesâ (Choi). As previously stated, the reliance of electroencephalogram data may show the activity within the brain, but depending on the section, the brain may be overactive during such time. When looking at an individualâs amygdala that is characterized as abnormal and overactive can be argued to the point of reverse-inference error due to trying to distinguish what is a normal or abnormal sign of the brainâs fear center (Choi). Brain Scans Versus Self-Report: Brain scans provide more complexity to detect brain impairments in individuals despite a clinical psychologistâs findings. A common problem within neurolaw is the group to individual inference problem. Psychologists often identify associations of brain defects with impairments by comparing a group of subjects with a localized defect to a group of subjects without the defect; this can result in overlapping due to the idea that impaired patients may have better control over a specific area in regard to the healthy controls and vice versa (Choi). The issue with psychological based evidence is that very few neuroimaging-based tests are used in psychiatric diagnosis which lacks the sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be reliable enough for inclusion in diagnostic criteriaâ (Choi). When looking at the defendants self-reporting of their behavior, brain scans often reveal more than those reports suggest. âWhile most peopleâs self-reports are not very accurate, they do not realize their self-reports are wrong so often in predicting future behavior. The brain seems to reveal something important that we may not even realizeâ (University of California). Jurors understanding of neuroscientific evidence is based upon whether they make a conn>
