We can work on Research Methods in Psychology

In each case, click on the link to the full news story (this will take you to a different
website) and carefully read the story. At the bottom of the page, you will find the
reference to the original study. You can then apply your knowledge of database
searching through the TRU library (e.g., PsycARTICLE, Google Scholar, etc) to find the
original article. You will note that we are giving you the opportunity to read about the
same piece of research in two sources: first, the non-scholarly write-up written for the
press on the APS website, and then the original scholarly article which contains all of the
details. Use these two sources to respond to the following five questions for each study:

  1. First, provide the references for BOTH the news story on the website of the
    Association for Psychological Science and then the scholarly source for the
    original article found on PsycARTICLES, Google Scholar, etc. Please give
    website addresses as well. Next, clearly describe one correlational result
    reported in the study. Your description should include the variables
    involved as well as the direction and strength of the correlation. The
    scholarly article will report the actual correlation value—this is very useful
    because it will help you visualize what the scatterplot will look like in the
    next question.
    PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology 3
    TRU Open Learning
  2. Draw and clearly label a scatterplot that illustrates this correlation using 10
    data points. Use the Interpreting Correlations interactive visualization to
    guide your drawing—you can plug in the correlation value reported in the
    article to see what the scatterplot should look like. Important here is the angle
    of the line connecting the dots in your scatterplot—most psychology studies
    do NOT report perfect correlations! The main aim is to demonstrate that you
    understand and can apply a correlation to a plot.
    If there are no data points, but there is a correlation given in the news article
    or study, use the correlation value itself to create your own data points. If the
    article does not even give the correlation itself, it should at least describe the
    correlation. Then you can create a correlation from that description that fits
    with the conclusions of the study. That is, you might need to create your own
    correlation value and data points from your own imagination to reflect the
    information or findings from the news article. The main aim is to
    demonstrate that you understand and can apply a correlation to a plot.
  3. In your own words, speculate about the three possible avenues of cause and
    effect outlined above. Which of these seems most plausible and why?
  4. How do the researchers interpret this correlation? Do they explain the
    correlation in a particular causal direction?
  5. Describe how you might be able to address the same question using a
    different non-experimental research design. Your proposed study should use
    the same variables but should operationalize them differently—for example,
    if the present study operationalized “exercise” as the amount of time spent
    running each week, there are infinite other ways to operationalize exercise,
    such time spent in a physically active job, number of times going to the gym
    per week, time spent walking each day, and so on.

Sample Solution

s page of the article has 2111 words. Download the full form above. The United States is home to probably the most famous and productive chronic executioners ever. Names, for example, Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgeway, and the Zodiac Killer have become commonly recognized names because of the terrible idea of their violations. Quite possibly the most productive chronic executioners in American history is John Wayne Gacy. Nicknamed the Killer Clown in view of his calling, Gacy assaulted and killed in any event 33 adolescent young men and youngsters somewhere in the range of 1972 and 1978, which is one of the most elevated realized casualty tallies. Gacy’s story has become so notable that his violations have been highlighted in mainstream society and TV shows, for example, American Horror Story: Hotel and Criminal Minds. Legal science has, and proceeds to, assume a significant part in the tackling of the case and recognizable proof of the people in question. John Wayne Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual and psychological mistreatment was instrumental in provoking specialist’s curiosity of him as a suspect. John Wayne Gacy was brought into the world on March 17, 1942, in Chicago, Illinois. Being the solitary child out of three kids, Gacy had a stressed relationship with his dad, who drank intensely and was regularly injurious towards the whole family (Sullivan and Maiken 48). In 1949, a temporary worker, who was a family companion, would caress Gacy during rides in his truck; be that as it may, Gacy never uncovered these experiences to his folks because of a paranoid fear of revenge from his dad (Foreman 54). His dad’s mental maltreatment proceeded into his young grown-up years, and Gacy moved to Las Vegas where he worked quickly in the rescue vehicle administration prior to turning into a morgue specialist (Sullivan and Maiken 50). As a funeral home chaperon, Gacy was vigorously associated with the treating cycle and conceded that one night, he moved into the casket of an expired high school kid and stroked the body (Cahill and Ewing 46). Stunned at himself, Gacy re-visitations of Chicago to live with his family and graduates from Northwestern Business College in 1963, and acknowledges an administration student position with Nunn-Bush Shoe Company. In 1964, Gacy is moved to Springfield and meets his future spouse, Marlynn Myers. In Springfield, Gacy has his subsequent gay experience when a colleague unsteadily performed oral sex on him (London 11:7). Gacy moves to Waterloo, Iowa, and starts a family with Myers. Be that as it may, after routinely undermining his significant other with whores, Gacy submits his initially known rape in 1967 upon Donald Vorhees. In the coming months, Gacy explicitly manhandles a few different young people and is captured and accused of oral homosexuality (Sullivan and Maiken 60). On December 3, 1968, Gacy is indicted and condemned to ten years at the Anamosa State Penitentiary. Gacy turns into a model prisoner at Anamosa and is conceded parole in June of 1970, an only a short time after his condemning. He had to migrate to Chicago and live with his mom and notice a 10:00PM time limit. Not exactly a year later, Gacy is accused again of explicitly attacking a high school kid however the adolescent didn’t show up in court, so the charges were dropped. Gacy was known by numerous individuals in his locale to be an enthusiastic volunteer and being dynamic in network legislative issues. His part as “Pogo the Clown” the jokester started in 1975 when Gacy joined a neighborhood “Sprightly Joker” comedian club that routinely performed at gathering pledges occasions. On January 3, 1972, Gacy submits his first homicide of Timothy McCoy, a 16-year old kid venturing out from Michigan to Omaha. Asserting that McCoy went into his room employing a kitchen blade, Gacy gets into an actual quarrel with McCoy prior to wounding him consistently in the chest. In the wake of understanding that McCoy had absentmindedly strolled into the live with the blade while attempting to get ready breakfast, Gacy covers the body in his unfinished plumbing space. Gacy conceded in the meetings following his capture that slaughtering McCoy gave him a “mind-desensitizing climax”, expressing that this homicide was the point at which he “understood demise was a definitive rush” (Cahill and Ewing 349). Very nearly 2 years after the fact, Gacy submits his second homicide of a unidentified youngster. Gacy choked the kid prior to stuffing the body in his storeroom prior to covering him (Cahill 349). In 1975, Gacy’s business was developing rapidly and his craving for youngsters developed with it. Gacy frequently attracted youngsters under his work to his home, persuading them to place themselves in binds, and assaulting and tormenting them prior to choking them (Cahill 169-170). The majority of Gacy’s killings occurred somewhere in the range of 1976 and 1978, the first of this time occurring in April 1976. A considerable lot of the young people that were killed during this time were covered in an unfinished plumbing space under Gacy’s home. For the rest of the homicides, Gacy confessed to losing five bodies the I-55 scaffold into the Des Plaines River; nonetheless, just four of the bodies were ever recuperated (Linedecker 152). In December 1978, Gacy meets Robert Jerome Piest, a 15-year old kid working at a drug store and offers him an employment at Gacy’s firm. Piest educates his mom regarding this and neglects to restore that night. The Piest family documents a missing individual’s report and the drug specialist educates police that Gacy would in all likelihood be the man that Jerome addressed about a work. When addressed by the police, Gacy denied any contribution in Piest’s vanishing. In any case, the police were not persuaded, and Gacy’s set of experiences of sexual maltreatment and battery provoked the police to look through his home. Among the things found at Gacy’s home were a 1975 secondary school class ring with the initials J.A.S., different driver’s licenses, cuffs, dress that was excessively little for Gacy, and a receipt for the drug store that Piest had worked at. Throughout the following not many days, examiners got various calls and tips about Gacy’s rapes and the strange vanishings of Gacy’s workers. The class ring was at last followed back to John A. Szyc, one of Gacy’s casualties in 1977. Futhermore, after looking at Gacy’s vehicle, specialists found a little bunch of filaments looking like human hair, which were shipped off the labs for additional examination. That very night, search canines were utilized to recognize any hint of Piest in Gacy’s vehicle, and one of the canines demonstrated that Piest had, indeed, been available in the vehicle. On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of steady police observation and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 killings and advises his legal advisor and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the unfinished plumbing space and the stream. 26 casualties were found in the unfinished plumbing space and 4 in the stream. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 killings, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a madness request yet was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few measurable pointers that specialists used to attach Gacy to the homicides. A portion of these include fiber investigation, dental and radiology records, utilizing the deterioration cycle of the human body, and facial reproduction in recognizing the people in question. Agents discovered filaments that looked like human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the unfinished plumbing space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, specialists likewise discovered strands that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar zone. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the filaments, which would later straightforwardly attach Gacy to the violations. The filaments in Gacy’s vehicle were dissected by criminological researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Moreover, the hunt canines that verified that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle demonstrated this by a “demise response”, which told specialists that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever decisively distinguished. A significant number of Gacy’s casualties had comparable actual portrayals and were along these lines hard to recognize by simply asking the general population. To recognize the people in question, specialists went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in scientific science and facial reproduction. Facial remaking is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and by and large face shape can be helpful in distinguishing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, criminological examiners can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in distinguishing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial remaking should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial reproductions is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-demise photos and data. Notwithstanding, this isn’t really ideal on the grounds that cranial highlights are not generally obvious or at the correct scale (Downing). To get a sensible and more exact portrayal of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a measurable anthropologist are normally fundamental (Downing). Three-dimensional facial recreation is finished by figures or high goal, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling examined photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general create results that don’t look fake (Reichs and Craig 491). In some cases, agents will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a procedure for facial remaking. Tragically, it’s anything but an ordinarily utilized strategy, as it expects specialists to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remaining parts, specialists can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to recognize a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial reproduction to recognize nine of the bodies found in the unfinished plumbing space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples