We can work on Relevant concepts of one modernist and one postmodernist family therapy theory.

During this quarter, you have learned about many important models of family therapy. These family therapy models, or schools, represent lenses through which we view and make meaning of clients’ lives and the challenges that they are experiencing within the context of their relationships. You have also learned a little about modernism and postmodernism and how these philosophical approaches impact our understandings of how therapeutic change happens and the stance and role of family therapists in the therapy room.

For this work summarizes the major concepts, the theory of change, and the stance and role of the therapist for one modernist and one postmodernist family therapy model. You should compare and contrast their theories of change and how the therapist positions herself or himself in relation to the clients, and summarize the significant differences between the modernist and postmodernist theories you chose in your conclusion.

Modernist family therapy theories to choose from: structural, strategic, Bowenian or intergenerational, Virginia Satir’s experiential family therapy, and Carl Whitaker’s symbolic experiential therapy.
Postmodernist family therapy theories to choose from: Narrative therapy (Michael White, David Epston, Stephen Madigan), solution-focused therapy (Steve de Shazer, Insoo Kim Berg, Bill O’Hanlon), Harlene Anderson’s collaborative language therapy.
Use the template to guide your work and organize your information properly. Be sure to delete any contextual information that is already on the template as you work.

be sure to address the following:

Define relevant concepts of one modernist and one postmodernist family therapy theory.
Analyze the historical impact of modernist and postmodernist family therapy theorists associated with the chosen models.
Articulate how one modernist and one postmodernist family therapy theory affect the stance and role of the family therapist.
Differentiate the theories of change in one modernist and postmodernist family therapy theory.
Evaluate each theory’s impact on marriage and family therapy.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

Comparison of Modernist and Postmodernist Family Therapy Models

Template for Analysis

I. Introduction

This work will summarize and compare one modernist and one postmodernist family therapy model, highlighting their major concepts, theories of change, and the stance and role of the therapist. The modernist model chosen for this analysis is Structural Family Therapy, and the postmodernist model is Narrative Therapy. We will explore their core principles, analyze the impact of their associated theorists, articulate their influence on the therapist’s role, differentiate their theories of change, and evaluate their overall impact on the field of marriage and family therapy.

II. Modernist Family Therapy Model: Structural Family Therapy

A. Relevant Concepts:

Structural Family Therapy, primarily developed by Salvador Minuchin, posits that family problems arise from dysfunctional family structures. Key concepts include:

  • Family Structure: The invisible set of functional demands that organize the ways in which family members interact. This includes patterns of interaction, power hierarchies, and boundaries.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

  • Subsystems: Smaller units within the family that carry out specific functions (e.g., spousal subsystem, parental subsystem, sibling subsystem).
  • Boundaries: Emotional and physical barriers that regulate the amount of contact between individuals and subsystems. Boundaries can be rigid (disengaged), clear (healthy), or diffuse (enmeshed).
  • Hierarchy: The power distribution within the family. A healthy family typically has a clear parental hierarchy where parents have more power and responsibility than children.
  • Coalitions: Alliances between two or more family members against another member. These can be stable or unstable and often disrupt the family’s hierarchy and boundaries.
  • Triangulation: A specific type of coalition where two family members in conflict involve a third member to stabilize their relationship, often pulling the third member into the conflict.
  • Family Life Cycle: The predictable stages a family goes through over time, each with its own developmental tasks and potential stressors.

B. Analysis of Historical Impact of Modernist Theorists:

Salvador Minuchin’s work has had a profound and lasting impact on the field of family therapy. His development of Structural Family Therapy provided a concrete and action-oriented approach to understanding and intervening in family dynamics. Key contributions include:

  • Emphasis on Systemic Interaction: Minuchin shifted the focus of therapy from individual pathology to the patterns of interaction within the family system. This systemic perspective became a cornerstone of family therapy.
  • Development of Concrete Interventions: Structural Family Therapy provided therapists with specific techniques for assessing family structure and intervening to create change, such as joining, mapping family structure (genograms and structural maps), reframing, and enactments.
  • Influence on Training and Practice: Minuchin’s work at the Philadelphia Child Guidance Clinic became a major training center for family therapists, disseminating his model widely. Structural principles and techniques are still widely taught and utilized in clinical practice globally, including in Kenya where systemic approaches are increasingly recognized.
  • Application to Diverse Populations: While initially focused on families with psychosomatic children, Structural Family Therapy has been adapted and applied to a wide range of clinical issues and diverse cultural contexts.

C. Articulation of Therapist Stance and Role:

In Structural Family Therapy, the therapist adopts an active, directive, and expert role. The therapist’s stance is one of joining the family system to understand its structure and then strategically challenging and restructuring dysfunctional patterns. Key aspects of the therapist’s role include:

  • Joining: The therapist actively engages with the family, adapting to their communication style and building rapport to gain entry into the system. This involves acknowledging the family’s perspective and creating a therapeutic alliance.
  • Mapping Family Structure: Through observation of family interactions and the use of structural maps, the therapist identifies key aspects of the family structure, including boundaries, hierarchy, and coalitions.
  • Identifying Dysfunctional Patterns: The therapist focuses on identifying rigid and repetitive patterns of interaction that maintain the presenting problem.
  • Challenging the System: The therapist actively intervenes to disrupt these dysfunctional patterns and create instability in the system, making it amenable to change. This can involve reframing problems, highlighting boundaries, unbalancing coalitions, and challenging the hierarchy.
  • Facilitating Enactments: The therapist encourages family members to interact with each other in the therapy room, allowing for direct observation of their patterns and providing opportunities for the therapist to intervene and guide new ways of interacting.
  • Restructuring the System: The ultimate goal is to help the family reorganize its structure into a healthier and more functional one with clearer boundaries, a stable hierarchy, and flexible patterns of interaction. The therapist acts as a guide and catalyst in this process.

D. Differentiation of Theory of Change:

The theory of change in Structural Family Therapy is based on the premise that changes in the family’s structure will lead to changes in the behavior and emotional well-being of its members. The therapist actively intervenes to disrupt and reorganize the family’s patterns of interaction, believing that by altering the underlying structure, the presenting problems will be resolved. Change occurs through:

  • Disrupting Dysfunctional Patterns: Interventions aim to interrupt rigid and repetitive sequences of interaction that maintain the problem.
  • Boundary Setting and Clarification: Helping the family establish clearer and more appropriate boundaries between individuals and subsystems reduces enmeshment and disengagement.
  • Hierarchy Realignment: Interventions focus on restoring a healthy parental hierarchy where parents are in charge and children are appropriately supported.
  • Unbalancing Coalitions and Triangulations: The therapist works to disrupt unhealthy alliances that undermine the family’s structure and create conflict.
  • Creating New Interactional Patterns: Through enactments and directive interventions, the therapist guides the family towards healthier and more flexible ways of relating to each other.

E. Evaluation of Theory’s Impact on Marriage and Family Therapy:

Structural Family Therapy has had a significant and enduring impact on the field of marriage and family therapy:

  • Established Systemic Thinking: It solidified the shift from individualistic to systemic perspectives in understanding and treating relational problems.
  • Provided Practical Techniques: Its emphasis on observable interactions and concrete interventions offered therapists a tangible and effective approach to working with families.
  • Influenced Other Models: Many other family therapy models have incorporated structural concepts and techniques into their frameworks.
  • Applicability to Diverse Issues: Its focus on family organization has made it applicable to a wide range of clinical issues, including child behavioral problems, substance abuse, and family conflict.
  • Contribution to Training Standards: Structural Family Therapy remains a core component of many marriage and family therapy training programs globally, including those seeking to address family dynamics in the Kenyan context.
  • Limitations: Critics have noted that its directive approach may not always be culturally sensitive or empowering for all families. It has also been argued that its focus on structure may sometimes overlook the subjective experiences and narratives of individual family members.

III. Postmodernist Family Therapy Model: Narrative Therapy

A. Relevant Concepts:

Narrative Therapy, developed by Michael White and David Epston, emphasizes the power of stories in shaping individuals’ and families’ lives and problems. Key concepts include:

  • Dominant Stories: Culturally sanctioned and often problem-saturated narratives that shape how individuals and families understand themselves and their difficulties. These stories can be limiting and oppressive.
  • Problem-Saturated Stories: Narratives that focus primarily on the problem, its history, and its negative effects, often obscuring times when the problem was not present or had less influence.
  • Unique Outcomes (Sparkling Moments): Experiences, events, or actions that contradict the dominant problem-saturated story. These offer possibilities for alternative, more positive narratives.
  • Externalization of the Problem: Separating the problem from the person or the relationship. Instead of saying “I am anxious,” the problem is framed as “Anxiety is trying to control my life.” This reduces blame and fosters a sense of agency.
  • Preferred Stories: Alternative, more empowering narratives about oneself and one’s relationships that emerge as unique outcomes are identified and amplified.
  • Re-authoring: The process of actively constructing and strengthening preferred stories, giving voice to neglected aspects of experience and creating new possibilities for the future.
  • Audience and Witnessing: The importance of having an audience (including the therapist and potentially others) to witness and affirm the preferred story, making it more real and sustainable.

B. Analysis of Historical Impact of Postmodernist Theorists:

Michael White and David Epston’s development of Narrative Therapy represented a significant paradigm shift in the field of family therapy, moving away from modernist assumptions about objective truth and therapist expertise. Their key contributions include:

  • Emphasis on Language and Meaning: Narrative Therapy highlighted the crucial role of language and the stories we tell ourselves and others in constructing our realities and problems.
  • Deconstruction of Power: It critically examined how dominant cultural narratives and power dynamics influence individuals and families, often leading to problem formation and perpetuation. This is particularly relevant in diverse cultural contexts like Kenya where societal norms can significantly impact family dynamics.
  • Empowerment of Clients: By externalizing problems and focusing on clients’ strengths and unique outcomes, Narrative Therapy aimed to empower individuals and families to become the authors of their own lives and solutions.
  • Influence on Therapeutic Stance: It fundamentally changed the therapist’s role from an expert diagnostician and director of change to a collaborative co-explorer and facilitator of narrative revision.
  • Wide Applicability: Narrative Therapy has been applied effectively to a wide range of issues, including trauma, grief, eating disorders, and relationship problems, across diverse cultural backgrounds.

C. Articulation of Therapist Stance and Role:

In Narrative Therapy, the therapist adopts a collaborative, curious, and co-authoring role. The therapist’s stance is one of deconstructing problem-saturated stories and co-constructing preferred narratives with the client(s). Key aspects of the therapist’s role include:

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples