ommitment to building trust and mutual respect between police and communities. In 2014, they issued a report called “Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned” to discuss the perceived benefits of deploying body-worn cameras, privacy implications, and policy recommendations. In fact, their report concludes that police agencies are discovering that body-worn cameras can serve as a useful training tool to help improve officer performance. For example, agencies are using footage from body-worn cameras to provide scenario-based training, to evaluate the performance of new officers in the field, and to identify new areas in which training is needed (Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned, 2014). By using body-worn cameras in this way, agencies have the opportunity to raise standards of perfo Play as the key to motivation  rmance when it comes to tactics, communication, and customer service (Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned, 2014). This can help increase the amount of reliability and trust citizens have in their officers to follow intended protocol on controversial situations, while also elim Play as the key to motivation  inating cases of officers handling a situation they have never come across or are inept in rectifying the issue without proper training. In conclusion, the importance of BWCs in today’s law enforcement has proven to increase as the public begins to respond with protest. I continue to press BWCs should be worn at all times by police officers because they encourage security of the public and police, hold officers accountable for inhumane actions and protect officers from false accusations of misconduct, and a Play as the key to motivation  lso prevent excessive brutality in the future by teaching future officers how to compose themselves in controversial situations. It is unfair and unwise to depend on witnesses for justice.>