Decide whether Patty Plaintiff has any legal claims arising from a series of unfortunate events. After reading the scenario, answer the questions that follow, making sure to fully explain the basis of your decision.
Patty Plaintiff is shopping at her favorite store, Cash Mart. She is looking for a new laptop, but she canât find one she likes. Then, realizing that she is going to be late for an appointment, she attempts to leave the store, walking very fast. However, before she can leave, she is stopped by a security guard who accuses her of shoplifting. Patty, who has taken nothing, denies any wrongdoing. The officer insists and takes Patty to a small room in the back of the store. The guard tells Patty that if she attempts to leave the room she will be arrested and sent to jail. At this point, the guard leaves the room. Patty is scared and waits in the room for over an hour until the manager comes in and apologizes and tells Patty that she is free to go.
About this same time, Gerry Golfer is hitting golf balls in his backyard. Gerry decides to break out his new driver and hits a golf ball out of his backyard into the Cash Mart parking lot. The golf ball hits Patty Plaintiff on the head and knocks her unconscious just as she is leaving the store.
Five days later, after recovering from her injuries, Patty returns to work at Acme Corporation. Unfortunately, she used her company email to send her mom a personal email about her injury despite being aware that Acmeâs company policy prohibits use of company email for personal communication. Pattyâs supervisor, Barry Bossley, discovers Pattyâs violation and Patty is reprimanded. When Patty goes home she uses her personal computer to post disparaging comments about her boss and Acme Corporation on social media. The next day Patty is fired from her job.
In a 6-10 paragraph paper, answer the following question: What types of legal claims could Patty make against Cash Mart, Gerry, and Acme Corporation? Consider the following:
What are the possible tort claims that Patty can make against Cash Mart? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.
Was Gerry negligent when he hit the golf ball that injured Patty? Discuss the elements of negligence and use facts from the scenario to support your decision.
Does Patty have a right to privacy when using Acme Corporationâs email system? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.
Can Patty be legally fired from her job for making negative comments about her boss and her company on social media? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.
Sample Solution
(10) Could genuine harmony break out all things considered? (John Le Carr”, ‘The Russia House’, 1989:102). As per Baker, dissimilar to collocations which are very adaptable, sayings are fixed structures (Baker 1992:63). The author can change the structure of the phrase just when making a joke, however for the most part Patty the Plaintiff the structure is watched (for instance, bounce the firearm â ‘to accomplish something early’ ‘ doesn’t bear variety). So we saw the contrast among collocations and maxims, yet shouldn’t something be said about phrases and fixed articulations? In contrast to colloquialisms, fixed articulations are increasingly straightforward in significance. A few instances of fixed articulations would be the accompanying: Ladies and Gentlemen, indeed, as it follows, all the best, Merry Christmas. Axioms can be named fixed articulations also. (11) Better late than never. Returning to the idea of sayings, we ought to know that not all figures of speech are fixed, some are more adaptable than others. When managing an interpretation which includes colloquialisms, an interpreter may end up in the situation of not distinguishing the informal articulation. ‘The more troublesome an articulation is to comprehend and the less sense it makes in a given setting, the almost certain an interpreter will remember it as an idiom'(Baker 1992:65). In any case, knowing this, the interpreter should give more consideration when he finds such tricky articulations. Dough puncher additionally discusses the troubles an interpreter may experience with regards to figures of speech and fixed articulations. She guarantees that there are figures of speech which have no proportional in the objective language, phrases with comparative partners in the objective language, however various settings of utilization, or colloquialisms utilized with both their strict and informal importance simultaneously. She at that point proposes different procedures of managing these issues. Cook proposes utilizing an objective language figure of speech which is comparable as far as significance and structure to the maxim in the source content. For instance, we can make an interpretation of the English maxim to ha Patty the Plaintiff ve a good time with somebody by the Romanian figure of speech a lua pe cineva “n c”ru”; both intend to trick somebody. A subsequent procedure would utilize a figure of speech with comparative importance however unexpected structure in comparison to in the source content. For instance, to fall down in buckets can be interpreted as a ploua cu g”leata. We could likewise decipher informal articulations by rewording: to be inexperienced can be interpreted as a fi neexperimentat or a fi amateur>
(10) Could genuine harmony break out all things considered? (John Le Carr”, ‘The Russia House’, 1989:102). As per Baker, dissimilar to collocations which are very adaptable, sayings are fixed structures (Baker 1992:63). The author can change the structure of the phrase just when making a joke, however for the most part the structure is watched (for instance, bounce the firearm â ‘to accomplish something early’ ‘ doesn’t bear variety). So we saw the contrast among collocations and maxims, yet shouldn’t something be said about phrases and f Patty the Plaintiff ixed articulations? In contrast to colloquialisms, fixed articulations are increasingly straightforward in significance. A few instances of fixed articulations would be the accompanying: Ladies and Gentlemen, indeed, as it follows, all the best, Merry Christmas. Axioms can be named fixed articulations also. (11) Better late than never. Returning to the idea of sayings, we ought to know that not all figures of speech are fix Patty the Plaintiff ed, some are more adaptable than others. When managing an interpretation which includes colloquialisms, an interpreter may end up in the situation of not distinguishing the informal articulation. ‘The more troublesome an articulation is to comprehend and the less sense it makes in a given setting, the almost certain an interpreter will remember it as an idiom'(Baker 1992:65). In any case, knowing this, the interpreter should give more consideration when he finds such tricky articulations. Dough puncher additionally discusses the troubles an interpreter may experience with regards to figures of speech and fixed articulations. She guarantees that there are figures of speech which have no proportional in the objective language, phrases with comparative partners in the objective language, however various settings of utilization, or colloquialisms utilized with both their strict and informal importance simultaneously. She at that point proposes different procedures of managing these issues. Cook proposes utilizing an objective language figure of speech which is comparable as far as significance and structure to the maxim in the source content. For instance, we can make an interpretation of the English maxim to have a good time with someb Patty the Plaintiff ody by the Romanian figure of speech a lua pe cineva “n c”ru”; both intend to trick somebody. A subsequent procedure would utilize a figure of speech with comparative importance however unexpected structure in comparison to in the source content. For instance, to fall down in buckets can be interpreted as a ploua cu g”leata. We could likewise decipher informal articulations by rewording: to be inexperienced can be interpreted as a fi neexperimentat or a fi amateur>
