We can work on Negligent Tort Liability

S​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​uperior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring and related components at new construction sites. Because some employees were assigned company vehicles equipped with company tools and materials and were expected to drive those vehicles to the work sites, Superior required all employment applicants to hold a valid driver’s license. Employees who were assigned a company vehicle were expected to drive for the company during the workday in order to transport job materials and company tools that were kept on the vehicle to job sites. These employees were expected to take the company issued vehicle home at the end of the work day. Superior hired Cory Jones as an apprentice electrician. Jones had completed an employment application in which he stated that he had a valid driver’s license and had not been cited for any traffic violations. These statements were untrue. His license had been suspended because of numerous traffic violations, including careless driving and driving without a license. Superior did not check on his driving record at the time he was hired because, as an apprentice electrician, he was not being assigned a company vehicle and was not expected to drive for the company during the work day. About a year aft​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​er hiring Jones, Superior promoted him to electrician and assigned Jones a company vehicle equipped with a rack for transporting wiring and other materials to and from the work sites. Superior intended that Jones drive during the day for the company and to take the vehicle home after the end of the work day. On a later date, when Jones’s work hours had ended and he was driving home in the company vehicle, he collided with two cars. The collision resulted solely from Jones’s negligence. Carolyn Carson and her son were severely injured in the collision and they sued Superior. The Carson’s alleged two theories of recovery against Superior: respondeat superior and negligent hiring. Write a four- to five-page paper (not including title and references pages) that addresses the following: Identify and discuss the legal elements of negligent hiring. Apply those elements of negligent hiring to the facts given in the case. Analyze whether Superior would be liable for negligent hiring. Identify and discuss the legal elements of respondeat superior. Apply those elements of respondeat superior to the facts given in the case. Analyze whether Superior would be liable on respondeat superior grounds. Must use at least three credible sources in addition to the ​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​course text

Sample Solution

find the cost of your paper
facebookShare on Facebook


FollowFollow us

The utilization of tobacco items, particularly cigarettes, has prompted the ascent in numerous illnesses. In the Assembled Realm itself, smoking has been the biggest reason for smoking, almost 15% of disease related cases originating from it. Aside from the various sorts of tumors, smokers have experienced constant obstructive pneumonic illness (COPD), asthma as well as diabetes. This has prompted developing worry by numerous state run administrations as well as many off the worldwide local area. Plain tobacco bundling has been introduced as a potential arrangement. Plain tobacco bundling includes the “normalizing of cigarette” bundles by making mandatory the expulsion of all brand symbolism and on second thought supplanting it with government ordered wellbeing alerts. Moreover, the textual style and logo of the organization name may just be placed on the case in a normalized text style and size permitted by the public authority. As the Australian government had executed this strategy in 2012, there have been a developing number of countries who have taken on a similar approach from that point to work on general wellbeing. Anyway there have been a developing number of questions connected with whether these strategies have been fruitful. The points of view in this manner thinking about whether plain bundling has been effective relate to the focal discussion of whether all countries ought to make arrangements for plain bundling. The principal viewpoint to consider is on the side of the progress of the plain tobacco bundling strategy. Crawford Moodie, a senior examination individual at the Middle for Tobacco Control Exploration, Establishment for Social Promoting, College of Stirling, gives contentions for its prosperity.>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples