note that the sub-topic under ‘importance” asks about why a healthcare professional would care about this decision.

The cases are:

Heartland of Atlanta Motel V. United States 379 U.S 241 (1964)
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, LLC, 562 U.S 223 (2011)

Sub-topics are:

(1) Facts: Background facts of the case (i.e. parties, what happened and procedural history)

(2) Issue: The legal question before the court

(3) Rule of Law: The legal principles and legal precedent the court will use to answer the issue

(4) Analysis/Application: Comparing the facts to the rule, to form the Application

How did each side present the rule?
What was the court’s reasoning and its analysis?
How did the court apply the facts in the case to the legal requirements?
What facts were compelling to the court in its analysis?
Did it use analogy or make any public policy arguments?
Did the court expand, reinterpret, or narrow the law to reach the conclusion?

(5) Conclusion: From the application, develop the Conclusion as to whether the rule applies to the facts

(6) Impact: The impact of the decision (i.e., at least what 2 cases have cited that holding and in what context)

(7) Importance: Why would a healthcare professional in the industry (or someone outside it) care about the decision and how it has changed the industry.

(8) Influence: At least two current business practices that have been influenced by the holding