Read the Microsoft 2019 Shareholder Letter, before working on the assignment. For more information on the company, please refer to Microsoft 2019 Annual Report which can be found at: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar19/index.html.
(a) Based on the strategic objectives and initiatives that have been discussed in the Shareholder Letter, evaluate how the strategic objectives and initiatives of each strategic theme can contribute to the four Balanced Scorecard Perspectives. Provide two (2) examples for each strategic theme using the format below. You may re-format the table when necessary.
Sample Solution
on the basis of this directive in the host Member State and enjoy equal treatment of the nationals of that Member Stateâ is extended to family members who have the right of residence which Maria does based on her dependency on Luis and Charlotte. This means it is within her rights to receive a maintenance grant as other British nationals in her position would. Article 24 (2) of the directive provides a derogation from the principle of equal treatment in regards to students. It states that Member States are not obliged to grant maintenance loans for studies unless the person is classed as worker or a person of such a persons family. She is defined as Charlottes family member who is an EU citizen and a worker in London so according to this Article of the directive it is within her rights to be eligible for the maintenance grant. In the case of Gravier additional fees for non-nationals fell within the scope of Article 18 on the basis that secondary law provisions provided support to Member States under Article 166 TFEU which allowed the court to apply Art. 18 TFEU . The requirement of 5 years of residency in the UK amounts to indirect discrimination to nationality in this case. This requirement largely impacts those citizens who move from other Member States which is also a fundamental freedom of EU citizens. The ESC, in my opinion, must refer questions about the local authorityâs refusal to grant Bjarne a school place to the Court of Justice of the European Union as legally, it is requirement to receive and have an education until the age of 18 in London. The authorityâs refusal of this has not only breached this legal requirement but it has also breached Bjarneâs Article 18 TFEU rights as well which include protection from discrimination of nationality. The fact that Bjarne has special needs means that his schooling options are already limited and the requirement of 6 years residency in the UK is purely discriminatory to any EU citizens who move to another Member State. The freedom to move and reside freely in another Member S>
on the basis of this directive in the host Member State and enjoy equal treatment of the nationals of that Member Stateâ is extended to family members who have the right of residence which Maria does based on her dependency on Luis and Charlotte. This means it is within her rights to receive a maintenance grant as other British nationals in her position would. Article 24 (2) of the directive provides a derogation from the principle of equal treatment in regards to students. It states that Member States are not obliged to grant maintenance loans for studies unless the person is classed as worker or a person of such a persons family. She is defined as Charlottes family member who is an EU citizen and a worker in London so according to this Article of the directive it is within her rights to be eligible for the maintenance grant. In the case of Gravier additional fees for non-nationals fell within the scope of Article 18 on the basis that secondary law provisions provided support to Member States under Article 166 TFEU which allowed the court to apply Art. 18 TFEU . The requirement of 5 years of residency in the UK amounts to indirect discrimination to nationality in this case. This requirement largely impacts those citizens who move from other Member States which is also a fundamental freedom of EU citizens. The ESC, in my opinion, must refer questions about the local authorityâs refusal to grant Bjarne a school place to the Court of Justice of the European Union as legally, it is requirement to receive and have an education until the age of 18 in London. The authorityâs refusal of this has not only breached this legal requirement but it has also breached Bjarneâs Article 18 TFEU rights as well which include protection from discrimination of nationality. The fact that Bjarne has special needs means that his schooling options are already limited and the requirement of 6 years residency in the UK is purely discriminatory to any EU citizens who move to another Member State. The freedom to move and reside freely in another Member S>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples