Pioneer part trade (LMX) centers around the interesting connection among pioneer and adherent. The point of this paper is to inquire about what job sex plays in these dyadic connections. Besides, it is examined whether sexual orientation directs the connection between authoritative citizenship conduct (OCB) and LMX. Writing on the point is analyzed and looked into. The consequences of the examinations talked about are very conflicting, and it is yet hazy what the job of sexual orientation is in LMX connections. In any case, obviously sexual orientation doesn’t go about as an arbitrator among OCB and LMX. Impediments, suggestions, and recommendations for future research are talked about. In the course of recent decades, examination into authority has developed quickly. A notable and broadly inquired about authority hypothesis is pioneer part trade hypothesis, likewise truncated as LMX. Though a ton of hypotheses center around the job of the pioneer explicitly, LMX hypothesis centers around the connection among pioneer and devotee. It expresses that pioneers create one of a kind associations with their devotees, and that these connections influence different factors, for example, work execution and fulfillment. Moreover, LMX connections appear to extend from low to high. A circumstance where a subordinate and a pioneer essentially go along to their commitments, would be viewed as a low-quality LMX relationship. An excellent LMX relationship goes past these commitments, and contains components of shared trust and regard (Avolio, Walumbwa, and Weber, 2009; Breevaart et al., 2013). Going well beyond commitments of an occupation is known as hierarchical citizenship conduct (OCB). Currall and Organ (1988) conceptualize the term as willfully helping other people without fundamentally expecting more than their check. These laborers feel a specific pledge to the association that goes past what is insignificantly anticipated from them and what is expressed in their agreement. As anyone might expect, OCB is considered to profit the association and add to authoritative viability (Organ, Podsakoff, and MacKenzie, 2006). Taking into account that the conceptualizations of excellent LMX connections and OCB both incorporate workers “giving their every one of the”, a connection between these two appears to be conceivable. A variable that is regularly looked into is numerous fields is sexual orientation. It appears to be productive to comprehend the job of sexual orientation in these perspectives. It would broaden the writing and information on the subject and add to the advancement of a more conceptualized model of initiative. Investigating the job of OCB and the impact of sex appears to be applicable for comparable reasons. The primary research question that will be tended to right now the accompanying: What job does sexual orientation play in LMX connections? So as to respond to this inquiry in enough detail, the accompanying sub-questions will be incorporated: How do pioneer and subordinate sexual orientation impact LMX connections? what’s more, Do pioneer and subordinate sexual orientation go about as a mediator in the connection among authority and authoritative citizenship conduct?>