We can work on Law Is an Instrument of The Rich to Oppress the Poor & Protect the Richs Rights Essay – Assignment Help

Need help with my Sociology question – I’m studying for my class.

here is my post:

Law as Conflict or Consensus
I believe that the law is an instrument of the rich to oppress the poor
and protect the rich’s rights. Despite people having expectations that
the law is meant to create justice and equality amongst all citizens,
this is not always the case. Kelemen (2019) explains that the society is
characterized by massive inequality, where the rich get richer as the
poor get poorer. That is because the rich have the resources to get
wealthier at the expense of the poor. Similarly, several people get to
power to protect the resources they have not acquired in an uptight
manner. Also, some people in power take advantage of their position to
spend the resources of the public to their advantage. Unfortunately, the
poor can hardly complain about this because the rich can influence the
law in their favor. Consequently, this shows why our society is
characterized by the law being used as an instrument of oppressing the
poor and protecting the rights of the rich.

Kelemen, R. D. (2019). Is differentiation possible in rule of law?. Comparative European Politics, 17(2), 246-260.
Write a comment to this person, person 1 : Naz , In my opinion I think that the law is more catered to people who have
money. Sadly to say if a person has money can get away with a lot more
than a person with no money. In my opinion the court houses just provide
a higher bailout and community service for people who have money. For
example the accident with Lori Harvey a hit and run and only received
probation. This is insane to me how someone can only receive probations
when they did a hit and run. Well than again her father is Steve Harvey
and he probably on paid a fee and she was released. In normal cases
with an average person it was stated that hit and run can go up to 15
years of jail time. In conclusion the way the law is set up it is
overlooked for people with money they are able to write off more and get
away with a lot more in my opinion. Write a a comment to this peeson :……

Person 2 Samanta , in a utopian world I can see the law functioning for every individual
equally and unbiased. In reality I believe that the law will only
benefit the people that can afford the best lawyers to guarantee the
best defense. The people that have the resources and wealth will be the
ones that can find the loopholes in our laws and get around them. I’m
sure that if a wealthy person calls because there is a suspicious person
in their neighborhood the cops will probably show up fast. Now if the
cops are called to a low income neighborhood they will probably show up
because that is their job, but maybe not as fast as they would in a
wealthy neighborhood. Thacher mentioned that, wealthy police
jurisdictions receive much more police protection per crime than poor
jurisdictions, and the whitest jurisdictions receive much more
protection per crime than the least-white jurisdictions (293). This is
not surprising to read, because many of us hear these types of
situations from people that are related to us. I have a cousin that
likes to hike and not long ago he went to hike the Palos Verde area. He
parked on one of the streets next to the hiking trails, and a home owner
comes out and started telling him he couldn’t park there. My cousin
knows the routine because he is Black, called 911 and told them what was
going on, sure enough the cops showed up very quick, and tried to
dissuade my cousin from parking there, but in the end there was no real
objection to not let him park there. I was enraged when I knew about
this, trying to dissuade him just because the wealthy lady didn’t want
my cousin to park there? Very upsetting to hear that the cops were
trying to cater to the interests of the wealthy lady, and not what is
fair by law. As Thacher also stated, public policing is more of a market
commodity than policing scholars commonly recognize, in that wealthy
households can in fact buy their way into well-policed neighborhoods
(293). The wealthier you are you will be able to live in a wealthy
community that has better quality of protection, better resources, best
schools. Thacher cited that inequality in the US has grown in so many
domains, and our government system has allowed the most-advantage
households to buy their way into well-protected neighborhoods, and that
socioeconomic inequality breeds inequality in police protection (295). I
want to believe that justice and law are equitable and equal for all
individuals, but wealth marks the difference even in regards of the
justice system. Write comment below ?

Person 3 : Ezequiel : This was a bit difficult to decide because I believe in both
perspectives but I tend to lean more towards the first example and this
is why. I think that the law was created as an instrument of the rich to
oppress the poor and to protect the rights of the rich because our
current legal system seems to be in favor of the rich. Those who are in
higher positions of power such as in government or those who own large
corporations never get to “pay their dues accordingly to the law,” what I
mean by this is, that white collar crime is most likely to not be
detected and very few offenders are tried in and sentenced in court. I
believe our criminal justice system is double sided when it comes to
issues like this and the social inequality that comes with it along with
the harm that white collar crime does to the victims. For example, I
found that “white collar crime accounts for over $300 billion each year
in America alone. Even with this huge number, it is estimated that
nearly 90% of white-collar crime cases are never reported to law
enforcement authorities. The recent trend in white-collar crime
statistics has shown a decrease in white-collar crime prosecutions. The
1980s and 1990s saw nearly 10,000 white-collar crime prosecutions each
year, while this past year saw just over 5,000 new cases. Also, that
there are over 5,000 arrests for white-collar crime for every 100,000
people in the United States and white-collar crime makes up just over 3%
of overall federal prosecutions yearly.” In comparison to street crimes
which tend to be with those involving people of lower economic status
that get caught for less financial damage or costs than those of white
collar crime but have no means of paying bail or hiring an attorney that
can represent them in court like the rich do and they end up serving
long sentences.
Write a comment : ,,,,,

Person 4 : Frederick :

When it comes to the law, I believe that the law was intended to be an instrument based on the consensus of universal norms for society’s good but has been tainted. At the same time, those who’re rich get lighter sentences compared to their low socioeconomic counterparts. The Institution for Research on Poverty reported in Connections Among Poverty, Incarceration, And Inequality, “More than 6.5 million people in the United States—about equal to the population of Massachusetts—were either incarcerated, on probation, or on parole in 2016 (Figure 1).[1] Although this number has been declining since 2009, currently about one in every 100 adults are behind bars. The United States has the highest incarceration rate, not only of any Western democracy (Figure 2), but also in the world” (“Connections Among Poverty…”). Looking at the statistics, it’s clear that the United States has a problem of over-incarceration. Tara O’Neil Hayes of the American Action Forum stated, “Adults in poverty are three times more likely to be arrested than those who aren’t, and people earning less than 150 percent of the federal poverty level are 15 times more likely to be charged with a felony—which, by definition, carries a longer sentence—than people earning above that threshold”(Hayes and Barnhorst). It shows that with money, the likelihood of incarceration is less as one can afford top-notch defense than those who can’t afford an attorney. My perspective is that the law’s intention is good but, over the years, has been tailored to oppressing the poor in a constant cycle of incarceration while making the system work for those more affluent. Write a comment below :

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples