Read these sections from On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft. What do you notice? What stands out to you? What connections can you make? Think of an “ah-ha” moment you had during your reading. Write a response between 250-500 words that expresses your thinking.
Sample Solution
An additional economic explanation could be the âresource curseâ, which suggests that countries âwith abundant reserves of non-renewable mineral resources, such as Nigerian oil [and] DRC gold [â¦] produce less diversified and less competitive economies, more income inequality [and] heightened danger of state capture and rent-seeking by ruling elitesâ[25]. This is because the revenue streams in these countries are so concentrated to the elites and ruling classes, providing only menial low-paid labour to politically-insignificant lower classes. Moreover, since they are primary-product-export dependent, manufacturing industries develop overseas where economies of scales are subsequently built; diminishing the ability of local entrepreneurs to set up competing businesses and increase their wealth. The likelihood of a democratic transition is therefore low, since âdemocracy is expected to increase redistribution and reduce inequalityâ[26]; something which is not in the interest of the elite ruling classes. Moreover, economic crises can have a large role to play in mobilising a population against the elites and causing the fall of a non-democratic government. Although the elites do have âthe monopoly over large scale violence, [â¦] states in crisis can [â¦] slide [â¦] into even more instabilityâ[7], particularly if a popular revolution is supported by a large proportion of the population, or, as in the case of Syria, the âimproving [â¦] economic conditions of the large Syrian refugee communities in neighbouring countries [provide] economic alternatives to joining armed groupsâ[8]; decreasing the stateâs military stronghold over its population. It is certain, however, that the likelihood of the collapse of a non-democratic regime as a result of an economic shock depends on its depth and severity, and the degree to which there is the resulting loss in welfare incentivising the population to mobilise. Furthermore, if the state is able to reallocate resources effectively despite an economic crisis, they may be able to withstand opposition to power; for example, by â[cutting] back outlays on subsidies, enabling it to concentrate more resources on the police, domestic security, and the stateâs cultural and media propaganda machineryâ[9] (page 165), as was undertaken in Egypt under Mubarak. While wealth and development are undoubtedly significant in causing a shift towards democratic governance, âauthoritarian regimes around the world [have shown] that t>
An additional economic explanation could be the âresource curseâ, which suggests that countries âwith abundant reserves of non-renewable mineral resources, such as Nigerian oil [and] DRC gold [â¦] produce less diversified and less competitive economies, more income inequality [and] heightened danger of state capture and rent-seeking by ruling elitesâ[25]. This is because the revenue streams in these countries are so concentrated to the elites and ruling classes, providing only menial low-paid labour to politically-insignificant lower classes. Moreover, since they are primary-product-export dependent, manufacturing industries develop overseas where economies of scales are subsequently built; diminishing the ability of local entrepreneurs to set up competing businesses and increase their wealth. The likelihood of a democratic transition is therefore low, since âdemocracy is expected to increase redistribution and reduce inequalityâ[26]; something which is not in the interest of the elite ruling classes. Moreover, economic crises can have a large role to play in mobilising a population against the elites and causing the fall of a non-democratic government. Although the elites do have âthe monopoly over large scale violence, [â¦] states in crisis can [â¦] slide [â¦] into even more instabilityâ[7], particularly if a popular revolution is supported by a large proportion of the population, or, as in the case of Syria, the âimproving [â¦] economic conditions of the large Syrian refugee communities in neighbouring countries [provide] economic alternatives to joining armed groupsâ[8]; decreasing the stateâs military stronghold over its population. It is certain, however, that the likelihood of the collapse of a non-democratic regime as a result of an economic shock depends on its depth and severity, and the degree to which there is the resulting loss in welfare incentivising the population to mobilise. Furthermore, if the state is able to reallocate resources effectively despite an economic crisis, they may be able to withstand opposition to power; for example, by â[cutting] back outlays on subsidies, enabling it to concentrate more resources on the police, domestic security, and the stateâs cultural and media propaganda machineryâ[9] (page 165), as was undertaken in Egypt under Mubarak. While wealth and development are undoubtedly significant in causing a shift towards democratic governance, âauthoritarian regimes around the world [have shown] that t>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples