We can work on International HRM’ traditionalism

International HRM has traditionally been concerned with how international organisations resource and manage their human resources across different national contexts (Brewster et al., 2011: 13).
Critically discuss this statement with reference to concepts of globalization, policy diffusion and the facilitating and constraining influences of MNCs, national cultures and institutional arrangements.
Note: You may find it useful to discuss your approach and framework with the module tutor before starting your assignment
All forms of assessment must be submitted by the published deadline which is detailed above. It is your responsibility to know when work is due to be submitted – ignorance of the deadline date will not be accepted as a reason for late or non-submission. Any late work will NOT be considered and a mark of zero will be

awarded for the assessment task in question.
You are requested to keep a copy of your work (excluding exams).
Feedback
You are entitled to feedback on your performance for all your assessed work. For all assessment tasks which are not examinations, this is accomplished by a member of academic staff providing your mark and associated comments which will relate to the achievement of the module’s intended learning outcomes and the assessment criteria you were given for the task when it was first issued. This feedback will be available on-line via Turnitin/Grademark® or may be sent directly to your Anglia Ruskin e-mail account.
The marker of your assignment will include feedback on written assignments that includes answers to these three key questions:

  1. What is your overall feedback?
  2. How does your assignment compare to the marking criteria?
  3. How can you improve in the future?

Examination scripts are retained by Anglia Ruskin and are not returned to students. However, you are entitled to feedback on your performance in an examination and may request a meeting with the Module Leader or Tutor to see your examination script and to discuss your performance.
Anglia Ruskin is committed to providing you with feedback on all assessed work within 20 working days of the submission deadline or the date of an examination. This is extended to 30 days for feedback for a Major Project module (please note that working days excludes those days when Anglia Ruskin University is officially closed; e.g.: between Christmas and New Year). Personal tutors will offer to read feedback from several modules and help you to address any common themes that may be emerging.
On occasion, you will receive feedback and marks for pieces of work that you completed in the earlier stages of the module. We provide you with this feedback as part of the learning experience and to help you prepare for other assessment tasks that you have still to complete. It is important to note that, in these cases, the marks for these pieces of work are unconfirmed. This means that, potentially, marks can change, in either direction!
Marks for modules and individual pieces of work become confirmed on the Dates for the Official Publication of Results which can be checked at www.anglia.ac.uk/results.

4.1 AssessmentInformation and Marking Criteria
4.1.1 Element 010 – Assignment
Mark Learning Outcome

  1. A clear structure, with a lucid introduction that demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment with coherent indication of the core conceptual issues and debates, indication of how they are relevant and important and an outline of how the topic is addressed. 10% 1
  2. Extent of critical discussion and evaluation of different theories of IHRM and demonstration of critical understanding of the differences between International and Comparative HRM and how that is relevant to Brewster et al’s analysis. 25% 1 and 2
  3. Evidence of knowledge of competing views of globalisation, policy diffusion and arguments about the roles of MNCs in the international transfer of HRM practice. 25% 2 and 3
  4. Extent of engagement and critical analysis of the competing debates about cultural and
    institutional embeddedness of HRM practices and their implications for the traditional concerns of International HRM as according to Brewster et al. (2011). 30% 3 and 4
  5. Concluding remarks that flow from the main body and therefore, earlier arguments and clearly and logically draws these together and apply them to the assignment to reinforce the key ideas and arguments.

Sample Solution

someone else is making the choice for them. Battin claims that no act is fully rational with coercion (131). This demonstrates that suicide by force could not be rational because if you are being forced with no other options then there is no way that could fully be your decision. Battin also reinforces this in which one of her criteria is that it should meet the interests of that individual (Williams, cited in Battin 1995, 146). Also, both of these points fail the criteria of ability to reason, in which they can move from premises to conclusion (Battin 133). If the individual is being forced or influenced by others, then they cannot figure out the premises or conclusion by themselves. If suicide is forced or not their decision, then it does not meet their interests but the interests of others, demonstrating that suicide in that regards could not be rational. One objection to my argument could be that the person was able to make those decisions by themselves even if they were coerced or influenced by anothe>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples