# We can work on INFERENTIAL STATISTICS FOR DECISION MAKING

Discuss, elaborate, and reflect on the following from chapter 10. I have listed the important topics and some of them are questions.
Give examples and elaborate on the applications of the topic. After reading your textbook, I want you to have a good understanding of the fundamentals of each chapter and show it to me. Please donât copy & paste from your textbook or some other online source. In other words, donât plagiarize. You can read online material if it helps to understand the material, but you have to write your own sentences.

1. Describe the following terms: treatments, experimental group, and control group. Give examples and applications.
2. How do you create a paired-sample experiment? Discuss in detail and give examples.
3. What does âPowerâ mean in an experiment?
4. What factors impact the power of an experiment?
5. The Smiths and McDonalds blame each other for Michael and Jane falling in love. On a test of propensity to fall in love, the mean of 6 members of the Smith family was 54 and the mean of 10 members of the McDonald family was 64. When a statistician compared the families’ scores with a t test, to determine if one family was more at fault, a t value of 2.13 was obtained. As a statistician if you adopt an Î± level of .05 (two-tailed test), what should be your conclusion?

Sample Solution

leads to the question of combatant qualification mentioned later in the essay. This is corroborated by the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, ending the Second World War, where millions were intently killed, just to secure the aim of war. However, sometimes civilians are accidentally killed through wars to achieve their goal of peace and security. This is supported by Vittola, who implies proportionality again to justify action: âcare must be taken where evil doesnât outweigh the possible benefits (Begby et al (2006b), Page 325).â This is further supported by Frowe who explains it is lawful to unintentionally kill, whenever the combatant has full knowledge of his actions and seeks to complete his aim, but it would come at a cost. However, this does not hide the fact the unintended still killed innocent people, showing immorality in their actions. Thus, it depends again on proportionality as Thomson argues (Frowe (2011), Page 141). This leads to question of what qualifies to be a combatant, and whether it is lawful to kill each other as combatants. Combatants are people who are involved directly or indirectly with the war and it is lawful to kill âto shelter the innocent from harmâ¦punish evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as mentioned above civilian cannot be harmed, showing combatants as the only legitimate targets, another condition of jus in bello, as âwe may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).â In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldnât this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: âit is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).â In addition, Vittola expresses the extent of military tactics used, but never reaches a conclusion whether itâs lawful or not to proceed these actions, as he constantly found a middle ground, where it can be lawful to do such things but never always (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is supported by Frowe, who measures the legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after >

## Is this question part of your Assignment?

### We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals